Rare germline variants in cancer-relevant genes are associated with breast cancer risk in young women with high-risk family history.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Mariya Rozenblit, Tao Qing, Yixuan Ye, Hongyu Zhao, Erin Hofstatter, Vinit Singh, Emily Reisenbichler, Michael Murray, Lajos Pusztai
{"title":"Rare germline variants in cancer-relevant genes are associated with breast cancer risk in young women with high-risk family history.","authors":"Mariya Rozenblit, Tao Qing, Yixuan Ye, Hongyu Zhao, Erin Hofstatter, Vinit Singh, Emily Reisenbichler, Michael Murray, Lajos Pusztai","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07560-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is incompletely understood why some women develop breast cancer 15-20 years earlier than the majority of women. We hypothesize that women with early-onset breast cancer and high-risk family history without germline pathogenic variants in cancer-predisposing genes (CPGs, n = 83) have a higher load of germline high functional impact variants (gHFI) in cancer hallmark genes (n = 1508) compared to healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Germline whole exome sequencing data were analyzed from 5818 breast cancer cases from UKBiobank and from 94 young women with breast cancer without CPG pathogenic variants from the Yale Cancer Prevention Clinic, and compared to 149 controls from Yale GENERATIONS project and 56,917 controls from UKBiobank. Rare gHFI variants were compared between cases and controls using the burden test and the optimal unified SNP-set Kernel Association Test (SKAT-O). We assessed germline versus somatic origins of pathway level alterations in the TCGA and Yale data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In UKBiobank, higher gHFI variant load was seen in CPGs in cancer cases regardless of family history (p < 8.78 × 10<sup>-8</sup>), and in hallmark genes in cases with family history vs controls (p = 0.0093). Similarly, numerically higher rare gHFI burden was seen in hallmark genes in the Yale cohort vs controls, but this difference was not statistically significant. Pathway level alterations were dominated by somatic events. These results suggest that rare germline variants in cancer biology-related genes partly mediate the contribution of family history to cancer risk in individuals without germline alterations in high penetrance CPGs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07560-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: It is incompletely understood why some women develop breast cancer 15-20 years earlier than the majority of women. We hypothesize that women with early-onset breast cancer and high-risk family history without germline pathogenic variants in cancer-predisposing genes (CPGs, n = 83) have a higher load of germline high functional impact variants (gHFI) in cancer hallmark genes (n = 1508) compared to healthy controls.

Methods: Germline whole exome sequencing data were analyzed from 5818 breast cancer cases from UKBiobank and from 94 young women with breast cancer without CPG pathogenic variants from the Yale Cancer Prevention Clinic, and compared to 149 controls from Yale GENERATIONS project and 56,917 controls from UKBiobank. Rare gHFI variants were compared between cases and controls using the burden test and the optimal unified SNP-set Kernel Association Test (SKAT-O). We assessed germline versus somatic origins of pathway level alterations in the TCGA and Yale data.

Results: In UKBiobank, higher gHFI variant load was seen in CPGs in cancer cases regardless of family history (p < 8.78 × 10-8), and in hallmark genes in cases with family history vs controls (p = 0.0093). Similarly, numerically higher rare gHFI burden was seen in hallmark genes in the Yale cohort vs controls, but this difference was not statistically significant. Pathway level alterations were dominated by somatic events. These results suggest that rare germline variants in cancer biology-related genes partly mediate the contribution of family history to cancer risk in individuals without germline alterations in high penetrance CPGs.

癌症相关基因中的罕见种系变异与有高危家族史的年轻女性患乳腺癌的风险有关。
导言:目前还不完全清楚为什么有些女性比大多数女性早 15-20 年患上乳腺癌。我们假设,与健康对照组相比,患有早发乳腺癌且高危家族史中没有癌症易感基因(CPGs,n = 83)种系致病变异的女性,其癌症标志基因(n = 1508)中的种系高功能影响变异(gHFI)负荷更高:分析了英国生物数据库(UKBiobank)中5818例乳腺癌病例的种系全外显子组测序数据,以及耶鲁大学癌症预防诊所中94例无CPG致病变异的年轻乳腺癌女性病例的种系全外显子组测序数据,并与耶鲁大学GENERATIONS项目中的149例对照组和英国生物数据库中的56917例对照组进行了比较。我们使用负担测试和最优统一 SNP 集核关联测试(SKAT-O)对病例和对照之间的罕见 gHFI 变异进行了比较。我们评估了TCGA和耶鲁数据中通路水平改变的种系起源与体细胞起源:在 UKBiobank 中,无论是否有家族史,癌症病例中 CPG 的 gHFI 变异负荷都较高(p -8),有家族史的病例与对照组相比,标志基因的 gHFI 变异负荷也较高(p = 0.0093)。同样,耶鲁大学队列与对照组相比,标志基因中的罕见 gHFI 负荷在数量上更高,但这一差异没有统计学意义。通路水平的改变以体细胞事件为主。这些结果表明,癌症生物学相关基因中的罕见种系变异在一定程度上介导了家族史对高渗透性 CPGs 中未发生种系改变的个体患癌风险的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信