Factors Affecting Nurse Anesthetists' Transition from Clinical Practice to Academia: A Scoping Review.

Q3 Medicine
AANA journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01
Denise J Stuit, Travis L Chabo, David Hart, Kerry Sewell, Susan P McMullan
{"title":"Factors Affecting Nurse Anesthetists' Transition from Clinical Practice to Academia: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Denise J Stuit, Travis L Chabo, David Hart, Kerry Sewell, Susan P McMullan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Workforce shortages influence all areas of healthcare including healthcare education. While recruitment and retention are known barriers within academia, the factors associated with the nurse anesthetist's transition from clinician to academics are unknown. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify factors that affect the transition from nurse anesthesia clinical practice to academia. A scoping review was conducted using the framework of Arksey and O'Malley. The search was performed using MEDLINE and CINAHL databases. Review selection was performed by two teams of two independent reviewers and summary of findings input into a comprehensive table. The search identified 733 articles published from 2014 to May 2023. Reviews were limited in nurse anesthesia and mainly consisted of alternate nursing specialties. Seven themes were extrapolated from the findings including mentorship (82%), orientation (47%), work-life balance (41%), early identification and empowerment (18%), formal pedagogical training (41%), faculty compensation (29%), and alternative faculty positions (23%). The review overwhelmingly revealed educator strategies available for undergraduate nursing, nurse practitioners, and midwifery, but not for nurse anesthetists. To gain a more robust knowledge of this current issue, additional research is required to educate, support, inform, and evaluate the current nurse anesthesia transition to academia process.</p>","PeriodicalId":7104,"journal":{"name":"AANA journal","volume":"92 6","pages":"411-419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AANA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Workforce shortages influence all areas of healthcare including healthcare education. While recruitment and retention are known barriers within academia, the factors associated with the nurse anesthetist's transition from clinician to academics are unknown. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify factors that affect the transition from nurse anesthesia clinical practice to academia. A scoping review was conducted using the framework of Arksey and O'Malley. The search was performed using MEDLINE and CINAHL databases. Review selection was performed by two teams of two independent reviewers and summary of findings input into a comprehensive table. The search identified 733 articles published from 2014 to May 2023. Reviews were limited in nurse anesthesia and mainly consisted of alternate nursing specialties. Seven themes were extrapolated from the findings including mentorship (82%), orientation (47%), work-life balance (41%), early identification and empowerment (18%), formal pedagogical training (41%), faculty compensation (29%), and alternative faculty positions (23%). The review overwhelmingly revealed educator strategies available for undergraduate nursing, nurse practitioners, and midwifery, but not for nurse anesthetists. To gain a more robust knowledge of this current issue, additional research is required to educate, support, inform, and evaluate the current nurse anesthesia transition to academia process.

影响麻醉护士从临床实践向学术界过渡的因素:范围审查。
劳动力短缺影响着医疗保健的各个领域,包括医疗保健教育。虽然招聘和留住人才是学术界已知的障碍,但与麻醉护士从临床医生向学术界过渡相关的因素却不为人知。本范围综述旨在确定影响麻醉护士从临床实践向学术界过渡的因素。我们采用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的框架进行了范围界定综述。使用 MEDLINE 和 CINAHL 数据库进行检索。由两名独立审稿人组成的两个小组对综述进行了筛选,并将筛选结果汇总到一个综合表格中。检索发现了从 2014 年至 2023 年 5 月期间发表的 733 篇文章。综述仅限于麻醉护士,主要包括其他护理专业。从研究结果中推断出七个主题,包括导师制(82%)、定位(47%)、工作与生活的平衡(41%)、早期识别和授权(18%)、正规教学培训(41%)、教员报酬(29%)和替代教员职位(23%)。审查结果显示,绝大多数教育工作者的策略适用于本科护理、执业护士和助产士,但不适用于麻醉护士。为了更深入地了解当前的这一问题,需要开展更多的研究,以教育、支持、告知和评估当前麻醉护士向学术界过渡的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AANA journal
AANA journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Founded in 1931 and located in Park Ridge, Ill., the AANA is the professional organization for more than 90 percent of the nation’s nurse anesthetists. As advanced practice nurses, CRNAs administer approximately 32 million anesthetics in the United States each year. CRNAs practice in every setting where anesthesia is available and are the sole anesthesia providers in more than two-thirds of all rural hospitals. They administer every type of anesthetic, and provide care for every type of surgery or procedure, from open heart to cataract to pain management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信