Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Follow-up for Neonates Requiring Neurocritical Care.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Isabella Eiler, Lakeisha Boyd, Melissa Klitzman, Bittu Majmudar-Sheth, Beatrice M Stefanescu
{"title":"Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Follow-up for Neonates Requiring Neurocritical Care.","authors":"Isabella Eiler, Lakeisha Boyd, Melissa Klitzman, Bittu Majmudar-Sheth, Beatrice M Stefanescu","doi":"10.1055/a-2486-8994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed exploration of associations of social determinants of health (SDH) with attrition rates of neurocritical care graduates at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the attrition rates of an infant's first appointment scheduled with the NeuroNICU follow-up clinic in correlation with SDH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The \"No Show\" group was more likely to have unemployed (<i>p</i> = 0.014), black or multiracial mothers (<i>p</i> = 0.005), public insurance (<i>p</i> < 0.001), lower gestational age (<i>p</i> < 0.001), live further from the clinic (0.011), and a lower zip code-associated income (<i>p</i> = 0.008). After controlling for driving time, race, and education, infants who had private insurance were 2.268 times more likely to attend their follow-up visit when compared with infants who had public insurance (<i>p</i> = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> A significant SDH-related difference existed among the \"Show\" and \"No Show\" groups. Identifying these factors during neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission can facilitate targeted support for families while inpatient and promote improved outpatient follow-up.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Follow-up for neonates requiring neurocritical care is strongly influenced by social determinants.. · Standardized SDH screening in NICUs, identifying high-risk infants for attrition, is used by few.. · Factors influencing disparities in the utilization of follow-up programs require further study.. · Equity-based attrition prevention interventions could improve outcomes and reduce costs..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2486-8994","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  This study aimed exploration of associations of social determinants of health (SDH) with attrition rates of neurocritical care graduates at follow-up.

Study design:  An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the attrition rates of an infant's first appointment scheduled with the NeuroNICU follow-up clinic in correlation with SDH.

Results:  The "No Show" group was more likely to have unemployed (p = 0.014), black or multiracial mothers (p = 0.005), public insurance (p < 0.001), lower gestational age (p < 0.001), live further from the clinic (0.011), and a lower zip code-associated income (p = 0.008). After controlling for driving time, race, and education, infants who had private insurance were 2.268 times more likely to attend their follow-up visit when compared with infants who had public insurance (p = 0.014).

Conclusion:  A significant SDH-related difference existed among the "Show" and "No Show" groups. Identifying these factors during neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission can facilitate targeted support for families while inpatient and promote improved outpatient follow-up.

Key points: · Follow-up for neonates requiring neurocritical care is strongly influenced by social determinants.. · Standardized SDH screening in NICUs, identifying high-risk infants for attrition, is used by few.. · Factors influencing disparities in the utilization of follow-up programs require further study.. · Equity-based attrition prevention interventions could improve outcomes and reduce costs..

健康的社会决定因素对需要神经重症监护的新生儿随访的影响。
研究目的:探讨健康的社会决定因素(SDH)与神经重症监护专业毕业生随访时的流失率之间的关系:探讨健康的社会决定因素(SDH)与神经重症监护室毕业生随访时的减员率之间的关系:研究设计:一项观察性回顾性队列研究,旨在评估婴儿首次预约神经重症监护室随访门诊的流失率与 SDH 的相关性:结果:"未赴约 "组的母亲更有可能是失业者(p=0.014)、黑人或多种族母亲(p=0.005)、有公共保险(pConclusions:显示 "组和 "不显示 "组之间存在明显的 SDH 相关差异。在新生儿重症监护室入院期间识别这些因素有助于在住院期间为家庭提供有针对性的支持,并促进门诊随访的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信