Desarrollo y Validación de una propuesta de Carta de Derechos y Compromisos de los ciudadanos frente a la e-salud

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING
Fernando Campaña-Castillo , Olga Paloma-Castro , José Manuel Romero-Sánchez
{"title":"Desarrollo y Validación de una propuesta de Carta de Derechos y Compromisos de los ciudadanos frente a la e-salud","authors":"Fernando Campaña-Castillo ,&nbsp;Olga Paloma-Castro ,&nbsp;José Manuel Romero-Sánchez","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcli.2024.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is a new technological paradigm in health care which has been reinforced following the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. Technological innovations create both challenges and opportunities to which citizens, healthcare professionals, and healthcare organizations must adapt to this reality. Although most health services have charters of citizens’ general rights and commitments, there is no specific charter concerning eHealth.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To develop and validate a proposal of a minimum set of citizens’ rights and commitments to e-Health.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Experts in a discussion group developed a charter composed of twenty items, ten rights and ten commitments to e-Health. Two rounds of consensus were necessary to obtain a final version of the charter. The twenty items were validated for content and assessed for appropriateness, relevance, and understandability using an internet-based 2-round Delphi approach in which 134 experts, patients and healthcare professionals participated. They rated the assessed attributes for each item on a 5-point Likert scale for consensus. The content validity index was calculated with kappa statistic, a consensus measure of inter-rater agreement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the first round, 18 items were validated, leaving only two commitments with unacceptable indices. Both were modified using the experts’ contributions and entered a second round of evaluation, after which the indices met the established requirements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A proposal for a chart of patient rights and commitments to eHealth was developed and showed adequate content validity and inter-observer reliability. This chart is expected to become a starting point for the debate on the role of technology in the way patients, professionals, and health services interact in the current context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46453,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Clinica","volume":"34 6","pages":"Pages 478-492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130862124000883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is a new technological paradigm in health care which has been reinforced following the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. Technological innovations create both challenges and opportunities to which citizens, healthcare professionals, and healthcare organizations must adapt to this reality. Although most health services have charters of citizens’ general rights and commitments, there is no specific charter concerning eHealth.

Objectives

To develop and validate a proposal of a minimum set of citizens’ rights and commitments to e-Health.

Methods

Experts in a discussion group developed a charter composed of twenty items, ten rights and ten commitments to e-Health. Two rounds of consensus were necessary to obtain a final version of the charter. The twenty items were validated for content and assessed for appropriateness, relevance, and understandability using an internet-based 2-round Delphi approach in which 134 experts, patients and healthcare professionals participated. They rated the assessed attributes for each item on a 5-point Likert scale for consensus. The content validity index was calculated with kappa statistic, a consensus measure of inter-rater agreement.

Results

In the first round, 18 items were validated, leaving only two commitments with unacceptable indices. Both were modified using the experts’ contributions and entered a second round of evaluation, after which the indices met the established requirements.

Conclusions

A proposal for a chart of patient rights and commitments to eHealth was developed and showed adequate content validity and inter-observer reliability. This chart is expected to become a starting point for the debate on the role of technology in the way patients, professionals, and health services interact in the current context.
制定和验证拟议的《公民权利和电子保健承诺宪章
背景医疗保健领域出现了一种新的技术模式,这种模式在 Covid-19 大流行爆发后得到了加强。技术创新既带来了挑战,也带来了机遇,公民、医疗保健专业人员和医疗保健组织必须适应这一现实。尽管大多数医疗服务机构都有关于公民一般权利和承诺的章程,但却没有关于电子医疗的具体章程。方法专家们在一个讨论小组中制定了一份章程,其中包括二十个项目,十项权利和十项电子医疗承诺。宪章的最终版本需要经过两轮协商一致。134 名专家、患者和医疗保健专业人员参与了这两轮德尔菲法,对这 20 个项目的内容进行了验证,并对其适当性、相关性和可理解性进行了评估。他们采用 5 点李克特量表对每个项目的评估属性进行评分,以达成共识。结果 在第一轮中,有 18 个项目通过验证,只有两项承诺的指数无法接受。结果第一轮验证了 18 个项目,只有两项承诺的指数无法接受,根据专家的意见对这两项承诺进行了修改,并进行了第二轮评估,之后这两项承诺的指数符合既定要求。在当前情况下,该图表有望成为讨论技术在患者、专业人员和医疗服务互动方式中的作用的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Enfermería Clínica is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is a useful and necessary tool for nursing professionals from the different areas of nursing (healthcare, administration, education and research) as well as for healthcare professionals involved in caring for persons, families and the community. It is the only Spanish nursing journal that mainly publishes original research. The aim of the Journal is to promote increased knowledge through the publication of original research and other studies that may help nursing professionals improve their daily practice. This objective is pursued throughout the different sections that comprise the Journal: Original Articles and Short Original Articles, Special Articles, Patient Care and Letters to the Editor. There is also an Evidence-Based Nursing section that includes comments about original articles of special interest written by experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信