Moaz Elsayed Abouelmagd , Maickel AbdelMeseh , Atef A. Hassan , Mohamed Ahmed Ali , Rashad G. Mohamed , Abdelrahman Mady , Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi , Mostafa Meshref
{"title":"History of head trauma and the risk of multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Moaz Elsayed Abouelmagd , Maickel AbdelMeseh , Atef A. Hassan , Mohamed Ahmed Ali , Rashad G. Mohamed , Abdelrahman Mady , Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi , Mostafa Meshref","doi":"10.1016/j.msard.2024.106183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease of the central nervous system with unclear etiology involving genetic, environmental, and immunological factors. The potential link between head trauma and MS is controversial, with conflicting evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the risk of developing MS following head trauma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted, including studies that investigated the risk of MS in individuals with a history of head trauma compared to those without. Observational studies, including cohort and case-control designs, were included. Data synthesis was conducted using RevMan software. GRADE was used to assess the certainty of evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen studies comprising 1,619,640 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The overall odds of developing MS were significantly higher in the head trauma group compared to the control group (OR = 1.41;95 % CI = [1.23, 1.61]; <em>P</em> < 0.00001; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 62 %). Sensitivity analyses based on the number of participants and quality further supported our results. Subgroup analysis showed that results remained consistent across different head trauma identification methods (<em>P</em> = 0.92), early age head trauma and head trauma defined as TBI, or concussion were also significant predictors of MS (<em>P</em> < 0.0001). Analysis of the number of hits suggested a dose-response relationship between the number of head injuries and the risk of MS. According to the GRADE, all outcomes were classified as low or very low certainty of the evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This meta-analysis suggests that a history of head trauma may be associated with an increased risk of developing MS. Further research is warranted to support our findings and explore the mechanisms linking head trauma to MS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18958,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 106183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211034824007594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease of the central nervous system with unclear etiology involving genetic, environmental, and immunological factors. The potential link between head trauma and MS is controversial, with conflicting evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the risk of developing MS following head trauma.
Methods
A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted, including studies that investigated the risk of MS in individuals with a history of head trauma compared to those without. Observational studies, including cohort and case-control designs, were included. Data synthesis was conducted using RevMan software. GRADE was used to assess the certainty of evidence.
Results
Fifteen studies comprising 1,619,640 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The overall odds of developing MS were significantly higher in the head trauma group compared to the control group (OR = 1.41;95 % CI = [1.23, 1.61]; P < 0.00001; I2 = 62 %). Sensitivity analyses based on the number of participants and quality further supported our results. Subgroup analysis showed that results remained consistent across different head trauma identification methods (P = 0.92), early age head trauma and head trauma defined as TBI, or concussion were also significant predictors of MS (P < 0.0001). Analysis of the number of hits suggested a dose-response relationship between the number of head injuries and the risk of MS. According to the GRADE, all outcomes were classified as low or very low certainty of the evidence.
Conclusion
This meta-analysis suggests that a history of head trauma may be associated with an increased risk of developing MS. Further research is warranted to support our findings and explore the mechanisms linking head trauma to MS.
期刊介绍:
Multiple Sclerosis is an area of ever expanding research and escalating publications. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders is a wide ranging international journal supported by key researchers from all neuroscience domains that focus on MS and associated disease of the central nervous system. The primary aim of this new journal is the rapid publication of high quality original research in the field. Important secondary aims will be timely updates and editorials on important scientific and clinical care advances, controversies in the field, and invited opinion articles from current thought leaders on topical issues. One section of the journal will focus on teaching, written to enhance the practice of community and academic neurologists involved in the care of MS patients. Summaries of key articles written for a lay audience will be provided as an on-line resource.
A team of four chief editors is supported by leading section editors who will commission and appraise original and review articles concerning: clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, neuroepidemiology, therapeutics, genetics / transcriptomics, experimental models, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, neuropsychology, neurorehabilitation, measurement scales, teaching, neuroethics and lay communication.