Endoscopic Repair for Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks Is Associated With a High Rate of Leak Resolution

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Khalid Fahoum , Tamara Kahan , Olivia Delau , Matthew Fasullo , Ki-Yoon Kim , Lauren Khanna , Gregory Haber , Paresh C. Shah , Tamas Gonda
{"title":"Endoscopic Repair for Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks Is Associated With a High Rate of Leak Resolution","authors":"Khalid Fahoum ,&nbsp;Tamara Kahan ,&nbsp;Olivia Delau ,&nbsp;Matthew Fasullo ,&nbsp;Ki-Yoon Kim ,&nbsp;Lauren Khanna ,&nbsp;Gregory Haber ,&nbsp;Paresh C. Shah ,&nbsp;Tamas Gonda","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND AND AIMS</h3><div>Staple line leaks following sleeve gastrectomy have significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic repair approaches are increasingly being used and studied, but follow-up time is limited, and more data are needed. Our primary aim was to describe long-term outcomes following repair; secondary aims were to compare repair approaches and assess factors associated with clinical success.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We conducted an observational cohort study of patients who underwent endoscopic repair of a sleeve gastrectomy leak from 2017 to 2023 at our tertiary care center. Patients without available follow-up were excluded. Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain baseline and clinical characteristics; long-term outcomes were ascertained from the electronic medical record and telephonic conversations with patients. Repairs were classified as drainage when transmural stents were placed and as closure when clips, sutures, and/or an intraluminal stent was placed.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>A total of 30 patients were included. The majority were females (77%) and Whites (74%), with a median age of 41.0 years (IQR, 35.1-51.8 years). The majority of patients (70%) initially underwent drainage, while the rest underwent closure. Median follow-up time was 1.2 years (IQR, 0.6 -1.6 years). Success rates for the initial repair approach without crossover or requiring surgical repair were 71.4% for drainage and 22.2% for closure (<em>P</em> = 0.02). Overall, 24 (80%) patients had leak resolution at the last follow-up, and the median number of endoscopies was 3 (IQR, 2-4).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Our study demonstrates a high rate of long-term leak resolution following endoscopic repair of sleeve gastrectomy leaks. An initial drainage approach may be associated with higher clinical success, although this was not noted in the multivariable analysis. Prospective randomized multicenter studies are needed to further evaluate and compare repair approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"27 1","pages":"Article 150897"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030724000564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Staple line leaks following sleeve gastrectomy have significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic repair approaches are increasingly being used and studied, but follow-up time is limited, and more data are needed. Our primary aim was to describe long-term outcomes following repair; secondary aims were to compare repair approaches and assess factors associated with clinical success.

METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study of patients who underwent endoscopic repair of a sleeve gastrectomy leak from 2017 to 2023 at our tertiary care center. Patients without available follow-up were excluded. Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain baseline and clinical characteristics; long-term outcomes were ascertained from the electronic medical record and telephonic conversations with patients. Repairs were classified as drainage when transmural stents were placed and as closure when clips, sutures, and/or an intraluminal stent was placed.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients were included. The majority were females (77%) and Whites (74%), with a median age of 41.0 years (IQR, 35.1-51.8 years). The majority of patients (70%) initially underwent drainage, while the rest underwent closure. Median follow-up time was 1.2 years (IQR, 0.6 -1.6 years). Success rates for the initial repair approach without crossover or requiring surgical repair were 71.4% for drainage and 22.2% for closure (P = 0.02). Overall, 24 (80%) patients had leak resolution at the last follow-up, and the median number of endoscopies was 3 (IQR, 2-4).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates a high rate of long-term leak resolution following endoscopic repair of sleeve gastrectomy leaks. An initial drainage approach may be associated with higher clinical success, although this was not noted in the multivariable analysis. Prospective randomized multicenter studies are needed to further evaluate and compare repair approaches.
袖状胃切除术渗漏的内镜修复与高渗漏解决率有关
背景和目的袖带胃切除术后绦虫线漏的发病率和死亡率都很高。内镜修复方法的使用和研究越来越多,但随访时间有限,需要更多数据。我们的主要目的是描述修复后的长期预后;次要目的是比较修复方法并评估与临床成功相关的因素。方法 我们对 2017 年至 2023 年期间在我们的三级医疗中心接受内镜修复袖状胃切除术漏的患者进行了一项观察性队列研究。没有随访的患者被排除在外。研究人员查阅了电子病历,以获得基线和临床特征;通过电子病历和与患者的电话交谈确定了长期结果。放置经膜支架的修复分为引流修复,放置夹子、缝合线和/或腔内支架的修复分为闭合修复。大多数患者为女性(77%)和白人(74%),中位年龄为 41.0 岁(IQR,35.1-51.8 岁)。大多数患者(70%)最初接受了引流术,其余患者则接受了闭合术。中位随访时间为 1.2 年(IQR,0.6-1.6 年)。在没有交叉或需要手术修复的情况下,初始修复方法的成功率为:引流 71.4%,闭合 22.2%(P = 0.02)。结论:我们的研究表明,袖带胃切除术渗漏内镜修复后,长期渗漏解决率很高。最初的引流方法可能与临床成功率较高有关,但在多变量分析中并未注意到这一点。需要进行前瞻性随机多中心研究,以进一步评估和比较修复方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信