Predicting bursal-side supraspinatus tendon tears with the acromioclavicular angle

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Nadhaporn Saengpetch , Jaturong Bamrungchaowkasem , Niyata Chitrapazt , Pinkawas Kongmalai
{"title":"Predicting bursal-side supraspinatus tendon tears with the acromioclavicular angle","authors":"Nadhaporn Saengpetch ,&nbsp;Jaturong Bamrungchaowkasem ,&nbsp;Niyata Chitrapazt ,&nbsp;Pinkawas Kongmalai","doi":"10.1016/j.asmart.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Bursal-side supraspinatus tendon tears are a common form of rotator cuff injury, often associated with acromial impingement and other extrinsic factors. Existing anatomical parameters, such as the lateral acromion angle, acromial index, and critical shoulder angle, have been studied in relation to rotator cuff tears; however, reliable indicators specific to the risk of bursal-side supraspinatus tears remain lacking. The acromioclavicular (AC) angle, which reflects the angular relationship between the acromion and clavicle, may offer a new predictive marker for this specific pathology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective case-control study, patients presenting with shoulder pain between January 2016 and February 2020 were reviewed. Group 1 included patients with isolated bursal-side supraspinatus tendon tears confirmed by arthroscopy, while Group 2 consisted of age- and gender-matched controls without rotator cuff pathology. The AC angle was measured using both X-ray and MRI. Diagnostic performance was assessed through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, identifying the optimal cut-point with Youden's index. Reliability was measured using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for both intra- and inter-rater reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ROC analysis determined an optimal AC angle cut-point of ≤160°. X-ray measurements showed moderate diagnostic value (AUC 0.60, sensitivity 67.2 %, specificity 51.7 %), while MRI measurements demonstrated good diagnostic performance (AUC 0.79, sensitivity 84.5 %, specificity 70.7 %). X-ray yielded high sensitivity but low specificity, suggesting its utility as an initial screening tool, whereas MRI provided improved diagnostic accuracy. Reliability assessments indicated high intra- and inter-rater reliability for AC angle measurements across both imaging modalities (ICC &gt;0.80).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The AC angle, particularly when measured on MRI, may serve as a valuable diagnostic marker for identifying isolated bursal-side supraspinatus tendon tears. While X-ray can be utilized as an accessible screening tool, combining it with clinical assessments and MRI is recommended for greater diagnostic precision. Further multi-center, prospective studies are warranted to confirm the clinical utility of the AC angle in predicting rotator cuff pathology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44283,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","volume":"39 ","pages":"Pages 15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221468732400030X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Bursal-side supraspinatus tendon tears are a common form of rotator cuff injury, often associated with acromial impingement and other extrinsic factors. Existing anatomical parameters, such as the lateral acromion angle, acromial index, and critical shoulder angle, have been studied in relation to rotator cuff tears; however, reliable indicators specific to the risk of bursal-side supraspinatus tears remain lacking. The acromioclavicular (AC) angle, which reflects the angular relationship between the acromion and clavicle, may offer a new predictive marker for this specific pathology.

Methods

In this retrospective case-control study, patients presenting with shoulder pain between January 2016 and February 2020 were reviewed. Group 1 included patients with isolated bursal-side supraspinatus tendon tears confirmed by arthroscopy, while Group 2 consisted of age- and gender-matched controls without rotator cuff pathology. The AC angle was measured using both X-ray and MRI. Diagnostic performance was assessed through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, identifying the optimal cut-point with Youden's index. Reliability was measured using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for both intra- and inter-rater reliability.

Results

The ROC analysis determined an optimal AC angle cut-point of ≤160°. X-ray measurements showed moderate diagnostic value (AUC 0.60, sensitivity 67.2 %, specificity 51.7 %), while MRI measurements demonstrated good diagnostic performance (AUC 0.79, sensitivity 84.5 %, specificity 70.7 %). X-ray yielded high sensitivity but low specificity, suggesting its utility as an initial screening tool, whereas MRI provided improved diagnostic accuracy. Reliability assessments indicated high intra- and inter-rater reliability for AC angle measurements across both imaging modalities (ICC >0.80).

Conclusion

The AC angle, particularly when measured on MRI, may serve as a valuable diagnostic marker for identifying isolated bursal-side supraspinatus tendon tears. While X-ray can be utilized as an accessible screening tool, combining it with clinical assessments and MRI is recommended for greater diagnostic precision. Further multi-center, prospective studies are warranted to confirm the clinical utility of the AC angle in predicting rotator cuff pathology.
用肩锁角预测滑囊侧冈上肌腱撕裂
背景滑囊侧冈上肌腱撕裂是肩袖损伤的一种常见形式,通常与肩峰撞击和其他外在因素有关。现有的解剖学参数,如肩峰外侧角、肩峰指数和临界肩角等,都与肩袖撕裂有关,但仍缺乏专门针对滑囊侧冈上肌腱撕裂风险的可靠指标。在这项回顾性病例对照研究中,研究人员对 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月间出现肩痛的患者进行了回顾性研究。第一组包括经关节镜检查证实的孤立性滑囊侧冈上肌腱撕裂患者,第二组包括年龄和性别匹配、无肩袖病变的对照组。交流角通过 X 光和核磁共振成像进行测量。诊断性能通过接收者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析进行评估,用尤登指数确定最佳切点。ROC分析确定的最佳AC角切点为≤160°。X 射线测量显示出中等诊断价值(AUC 0.60,灵敏度 67.2%,特异性 51.7%),而 MRI 测量显示出良好的诊断性能(AUC 0.79,灵敏度 84.5%,特异性 70.7%)。X 射线的灵敏度较高,但特异性较低,这表明它可用作初步筛查工具,而核磁共振成像可提高诊断准确性。可靠性评估表明,在两种成像模式下,AC 角测量的内部和同行间可靠性都很高(ICC >0.80)。虽然X光片可作为一种简便的筛查工具,但建议将其与临床评估和核磁共振成像相结合,以提高诊断的准确性。需要进一步开展多中心、前瞻性研究,以确认 AC 角在预测肩袖病变方面的临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology (AP-SMART) is the official peer-reviewed, open access journal of the Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society (APKASS) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Society of Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine (JOSKAS). It is published quarterly, in January, April, July and October, by Elsevier. The mission of AP-SMART is to inspire clinicians, practitioners, scientists and engineers to work towards a common goal to improve quality of life in the international community. The Journal publishes original research, reviews, editorials, perspectives, and letters to the Editor. Multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines will be the trend in the coming decades. AP-SMART provides a platform for the exchange of new clinical and scientific information in the most precise and expeditious way to achieve timely dissemination of information and cross-fertilization of ideas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信