Metalinguistic awareness in L2 Italian children with a migrant background: A trade-off between cognitive advantages and syntactic vulnerabilities

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Francesca Festi, Maria Vender
{"title":"Metalinguistic awareness in L2 Italian children with a migrant background: A trade-off between cognitive advantages and syntactic vulnerabilities","authors":"Francesca Festi,&nbsp;Maria Vender","doi":"10.1016/j.amper.2024.100208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Metalinguistic awareness is a domain where bilingual advantages have been reported, with bilinguals outperforming monolinguals in tasks that require separating syntactic form from semantic content, demonstrating higher selective attention, interference suppression, and inhibition skills (Adesope et al., 2010). However, these cognitive advantages may be counterbalanced by weaknesses in specific linguistic domains, such as morphosyntactic processing. This study investigates the presence of such trade-offs in a Sentence-Judgment Task adapted from Bialystok (1986) in which monolinguals and bilinguals are compared in their ability to judge syntactically well-formed and ungrammatical utterances, regardless of their meaning.</div><div>We assessed 80 school-aged children, including 36 Italian monolinguals and 44 bilinguals with Italian as a second language, using a task that involved 48 sentences varying in syntactic accuracy and semantic congruency across four conditions. Results from mixed-effects logistic regressions indicated that while both groups performed similarly when judging grammatical and semantically plausible sentences, bilinguals showed superior skills in evaluating syntactically correct but semantically anomalous sentences. Conversely, they underperformed in detecting grammatically incorrect but semantically plausible sentences, highlighting weaker morphosyntactic processing. These findings thus support the trade-off hypothesis (Leivada et al., 2023), revealing that while bilinguals display cognitive advantages in metalinguistic awareness, they also may face challenges in linguistic domains. Importantly, our study addressed bilingual children with a migrant backgrounds, a population less studied and potentially more vulnerable, ultimately underscoring the importance of maintaining the home language and providing rich, high-quality input to enhance both their cognitive and linguistic development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35076,"journal":{"name":"Ampersand","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ampersand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039024000468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metalinguistic awareness is a domain where bilingual advantages have been reported, with bilinguals outperforming monolinguals in tasks that require separating syntactic form from semantic content, demonstrating higher selective attention, interference suppression, and inhibition skills (Adesope et al., 2010). However, these cognitive advantages may be counterbalanced by weaknesses in specific linguistic domains, such as morphosyntactic processing. This study investigates the presence of such trade-offs in a Sentence-Judgment Task adapted from Bialystok (1986) in which monolinguals and bilinguals are compared in their ability to judge syntactically well-formed and ungrammatical utterances, regardless of their meaning.
We assessed 80 school-aged children, including 36 Italian monolinguals and 44 bilinguals with Italian as a second language, using a task that involved 48 sentences varying in syntactic accuracy and semantic congruency across four conditions. Results from mixed-effects logistic regressions indicated that while both groups performed similarly when judging grammatical and semantically plausible sentences, bilinguals showed superior skills in evaluating syntactically correct but semantically anomalous sentences. Conversely, they underperformed in detecting grammatically incorrect but semantically plausible sentences, highlighting weaker morphosyntactic processing. These findings thus support the trade-off hypothesis (Leivada et al., 2023), revealing that while bilinguals display cognitive advantages in metalinguistic awareness, they also may face challenges in linguistic domains. Importantly, our study addressed bilingual children with a migrant backgrounds, a population less studied and potentially more vulnerable, ultimately underscoring the importance of maintaining the home language and providing rich, high-quality input to enhance both their cognitive and linguistic development.
具有移民背景的意大利语第二语言儿童的金属语言意识:认知优势与句法弱点之间的权衡
据报道,在需要将句法形式与语义内容分离的任务中,二语者表现出更高的选择性注意、干扰抑制和抑制技能(Adesope et al.)然而,这些认知优势可能会被特定语言领域(如形态句法处理)的弱点所抵消。本研究调查了在句子判断任务中是否存在这种权衡,该任务改编自 Bialystok(1986 年),其中比较了单语和双语儿童判断句法结构良好和不符合语法的语句的能力,而不论其意义如何。我们评估了 80 名学龄儿童,其中包括 36 名意大利语单语儿童和 44 名以意大利语为第二语言的双语儿童。混合效应逻辑回归结果表明,虽然两组人在判断语法和语义合理的句子时表现相似,但双语者在评估句法正确但语义异常的句子时表现出更高的技能。相反,他们在检测语法错误但语义合理的句子时表现不佳,这凸显出他们的形态句法处理能力较弱。因此,这些发现支持了权衡假说(Leivada et al.,2023),揭示了虽然双语者在金属语言意识方面表现出认知优势,但他们也可能在语言领域面临挑战。重要的是,我们的研究针对的是具有移民背景的双语儿童,对这一人群的研究较少,而且他们可能更容易受到伤害,这最终强调了保持母语和提供丰富、高质量的输入以促进他们的认知和语言发展的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ampersand
Ampersand Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信