Hydro-mechanical behaviour of composite-geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with marginal lateritic backfills through instrumented model tests

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
K.A. Dhanya, P.V. Divya
{"title":"Hydro-mechanical behaviour of composite-geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with marginal lateritic backfills through instrumented model tests","authors":"K.A. Dhanya,&nbsp;P.V. Divya","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To examine the hydro-mechanical behavior of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Walls (GRSW) backfilled with locally available marginal lateritic soils, physical model tests were conducted during construction, surcharge loading, and rainfall infiltration. Various reinforcements were tested, including a conventional geogrid (GG) and two types of composite geosynthetic reinforcements (CGR) with equivalent stiffness but different configurations. The results showed that suction was maintained throughout surcharging, but during rainfall infiltration, the GG model lost suction after 12,240 min, while both CGRs retained it. Strain evaluations indicated that all reinforcements remained within serviceability limits during surcharging, but the GG model exceeded these limits during rainfall, while the CGRs stayed within acceptable limits with minimal strain increases. Additionally, the GG model showed a 61% increase in facing deformation during rainfall, exceeding serviceability limits, whereas the CGRs remained within permissible limits. The study emphasizes the importance of cautious use of marginal soils in backfill applications. These soils can still be suitable for GRSW when reinforced with composite geosynthetics, especially CGR made of polyester geogrids with non-woven geotextile bonded longitudinally to the polyester strips. This configuration demonstrated superior performance by reducing facing deformation through better drainage and improved soil-reinforcement interaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"53 1","pages":"Pages 474-495"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114424001328","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To examine the hydro-mechanical behavior of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Walls (GRSW) backfilled with locally available marginal lateritic soils, physical model tests were conducted during construction, surcharge loading, and rainfall infiltration. Various reinforcements were tested, including a conventional geogrid (GG) and two types of composite geosynthetic reinforcements (CGR) with equivalent stiffness but different configurations. The results showed that suction was maintained throughout surcharging, but during rainfall infiltration, the GG model lost suction after 12,240 min, while both CGRs retained it. Strain evaluations indicated that all reinforcements remained within serviceability limits during surcharging, but the GG model exceeded these limits during rainfall, while the CGRs stayed within acceptable limits with minimal strain increases. Additionally, the GG model showed a 61% increase in facing deformation during rainfall, exceeding serviceability limits, whereas the CGRs remained within permissible limits. The study emphasizes the importance of cautious use of marginal soils in backfill applications. These soils can still be suitable for GRSW when reinforced with composite geosynthetics, especially CGR made of polyester geogrids with non-woven geotextile bonded longitudinally to the polyester strips. This configuration demonstrated superior performance by reducing facing deformation through better drainage and improved soil-reinforcement interaction.

Abstract Image

通过仪器模型试验研究边缘红土回填的复合土工合成材料加固土墙的水力学行为
为了研究土工合成材料加固土墙(GRSW)的水力机械行为,我们在施工、附加荷载和降雨渗透期间进行了物理模型试验。测试了各种加固材料,包括传统的土工格栅(GG)和两种刚度相当但结构不同的复合土工合成材料(CGR)。结果表明,在整个充水过程中都保持了吸力,但在降雨渗透过程中,GG 模型在 12 240 分钟后失去了吸力,而两种 CGR 都保持了吸力。应变评估结果表明,所有钢筋在加载过程中都保持在可使用范围内,但 GG 模型在降雨过程中超过了可使用范围,而 CGR 则保持在可接受范围内,应变增加极小。此外,GG 模型在降雨期间表面变形增加了 61%,超过了适用性限制,而 CGR 仍在允许范围内。这项研究强调了在回填应用中谨慎使用边缘土壤的重要性。如果使用复合土工合成材料,特别是由聚酯土工格栅和纵向粘接在聚酯条上的无纺土工织物组成的 CGR,对这些土壤进行加固,它们仍然可以适用于 GRSW。这种结构通过更好的排水和改善土壤与加固材料之间的相互作用,减少了表面变形,表现出卓越的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Geotextiles and Geomembranes 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
21.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident. Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信