In-stent restenosis.

Rym El Khoury, Ahmad Asha, Philip V Bystrom, Robert Weiss, Chad E Jacobs, Lewis B Schwartz
{"title":"In-stent restenosis.","authors":"Rym El Khoury, Ahmad Asha, Philip V Bystrom, Robert Weiss, Chad E Jacobs, Lewis B Schwartz","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13199-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endovascular arterial recanalization has become the mainstay therapy for peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Although immediate technical success is achieved in greater than 90% of cases, longer-term results continue to vary based on the clinical presentation, and the treated target lesion. In the current era, sustained patency can be expected following intervention in the carotid, coronary, renal, and iliac arteries. However, maintaining patency in the femoropopliteal and tibial arteries continues to be present a significant challenge. Endovascular intervention in the peripheral arteries is met with heavy complex plaque burdens, multiple serial stenoses and occlusions, sluggish blood flow, low mean and oscillatory shear stress, and repetitive axial, radial and torsional deformation that hinder its outcomes. In order to maximize the longevity of endovascular intervention, its therapeutic armamentarium has developed to include vessel preparation, drug delivery, and arterial scaffolding. Nevertheless, in the aggregate of real-world clinical practice, recurrence of stenosis still complicates up to 50% of all infrainguinal endovascular procedures after only one year. Unfortunately, this timeline is often insufficient to reliably address lifestyle limiting symptoms, heal a wound, or save a threatened extremity. The purpose of this review is to discuss the pathophysiology, incidence, risk factors, morphology and treatment of restenosis following peripheral endovascular intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"65 5","pages":"439-453"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13199-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endovascular arterial recanalization has become the mainstay therapy for peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Although immediate technical success is achieved in greater than 90% of cases, longer-term results continue to vary based on the clinical presentation, and the treated target lesion. In the current era, sustained patency can be expected following intervention in the carotid, coronary, renal, and iliac arteries. However, maintaining patency in the femoropopliteal and tibial arteries continues to be present a significant challenge. Endovascular intervention in the peripheral arteries is met with heavy complex plaque burdens, multiple serial stenoses and occlusions, sluggish blood flow, low mean and oscillatory shear stress, and repetitive axial, radial and torsional deformation that hinder its outcomes. In order to maximize the longevity of endovascular intervention, its therapeutic armamentarium has developed to include vessel preparation, drug delivery, and arterial scaffolding. Nevertheless, in the aggregate of real-world clinical practice, recurrence of stenosis still complicates up to 50% of all infrainguinal endovascular procedures after only one year. Unfortunately, this timeline is often insufficient to reliably address lifestyle limiting symptoms, heal a wound, or save a threatened extremity. The purpose of this review is to discuss the pathophysiology, incidence, risk factors, morphology and treatment of restenosis following peripheral endovascular intervention.

支架内再狭窄
血管内动脉再通术已成为治疗外周动脉闭塞性疾病的主要方法。尽管90%以上的病例都能获得立竿见影的技术成功,但根据临床表现和治疗靶病变的不同,长期效果也不尽相同。在当今时代,对颈动脉、冠状动脉、肾动脉和髂动脉进行干预后,可望获得持续的通畅性。然而,维持股动脉和胫动脉的通畅仍然是一项重大挑战。外周动脉的血管内介入治疗面临着严重的复杂斑块负担、多处连续性狭窄和闭塞、血流缓慢、平均和振荡剪应力低以及重复的轴向、径向和扭转变形等问题,这些都阻碍了治疗效果。为了最大限度地延长血管内介入治疗的寿命,其治疗手段已发展到包括血管准备、给药和动脉支架。尽管如此,在实际临床实践中,仍有高达 50% 的腹股沟下血管内介入手术在一年后再次发生狭窄。不幸的是,这一时限往往不足以可靠地解决限制生活方式的症状、愈合伤口或挽救濒临危险的肢体。本综述旨在讨论外周血管介入术后再狭窄的病理生理学、发病率、风险因素、形态学和治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信