Five ways to get a grip on applying a program evaluation model in health professions education academies.

Canadian medical education journal Pub Date : 2024-11-13 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.36834/cmej.77995
Rebecca D Blanchard, Katherine E McDaniel, Deborah L Engle
{"title":"Five ways to get a grip on applying a program evaluation model in health professions education academies.","authors":"Rebecca D Blanchard, Katherine E McDaniel, Deborah L Engle","doi":"10.36834/cmej.77995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The proliferation of health professions educator academies across Canada and the United States illustrates the value they hold for faculty and institutions. Yet, establishing and evaluating the efficacy of them through program evaluation can be challenging. Moreover, academy leadership often lack the time, bandwidth skillset and personnel to undertake rigorous program evaluation efforts. We outline a step-by-step guide for getting a grip on evaluating health professions educator academies. Developing a plan for program evaluation in advance of any new academy initiative helps to ensure the academy calibrates and re-calibrates to accomplish outcomes and meet stakeholder expectations. It also provides a mechanism for tracking academy impact, which strengthens requests for funding, promotes sustainability and encourages continued buy-in and support from institutional stakeholders. For all of these reasons, we present the following recommendations: apply the relevant program evaluation framework(s); identify resources for program evaluation; prepare to tell your academy's story; list desired program outcomes; establish a data collection plan; and obtain institutional review board approval.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":"15 5","pages":"142-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proliferation of health professions educator academies across Canada and the United States illustrates the value they hold for faculty and institutions. Yet, establishing and evaluating the efficacy of them through program evaluation can be challenging. Moreover, academy leadership often lack the time, bandwidth skillset and personnel to undertake rigorous program evaluation efforts. We outline a step-by-step guide for getting a grip on evaluating health professions educator academies. Developing a plan for program evaluation in advance of any new academy initiative helps to ensure the academy calibrates and re-calibrates to accomplish outcomes and meet stakeholder expectations. It also provides a mechanism for tracking academy impact, which strengthens requests for funding, promotes sustainability and encourages continued buy-in and support from institutional stakeholders. For all of these reasons, we present the following recommendations: apply the relevant program evaluation framework(s); identify resources for program evaluation; prepare to tell your academy's story; list desired program outcomes; establish a data collection plan; and obtain institutional review board approval.

在卫生专业教育学院应用项目评估模式的五种方法。
卫生专业教育学院在加拿大和美国遍地开花,说明了它们对教师和院校的价值。然而,通过项目评估来建立和评价这些学院的成效可能具有挑战性。此外,学院领导往往缺乏时间、带宽技能和人员来开展严格的项目评估工作。我们将为您提供一份逐步指南,帮助您掌握健康专业教育学院的评估工作。在实施任何新的学院计划之前,制定项目评估计划有助于确保学院进行校准和再校准,以取得成果并满足利益相关者的期望。它还提供了一个跟踪学院影响的机制,从而加强资金申请、促进可持续发展并鼓励机构利益相关者的持续支持。基于以上原因,我们提出以下建议:应用相关的项目评估框架;确定项目评估的资源;准备讲述你的学院的故事;列出预期的项目成果;制定数据收集计划;获得机构审查委员会的批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信