Does distance to hospital and interhospital transfer negatively impact time to definitive fixation and outcomes in patients with fractured neck of femur in a rural setting?
Geoffrey T Murphy, Felice Tong, Paul Rozenbroek, David Mostofizadeh, Andrew Sefton
{"title":"Does distance to hospital and interhospital transfer negatively impact time to definitive fixation and outcomes in patients with fractured neck of femur in a rural setting?","authors":"Geoffrey T Murphy, Felice Tong, Paul Rozenbroek, David Mostofizadeh, Andrew Sefton","doi":"10.1111/ajr.13200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate in patients over 65 with neck of femur (NOF) fractures in Rural Australia, does initial presentation to a peripheral hospital result in a delay to surgery?</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Dubba Base Hospital, Trauma Hospital Rural Australia (Modified Monash Model (MMM) 3) and catchment area (MMM 3-7), NSW, Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study includes 350 patients over 65, presenting with closed, unilateral NOF fractures who underwent operative management at the operating centre, 203 from peripheral hospitals.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes include time to surgery and adherence to recommended timeframes for NOF fixation. Secondary outcomes encompass complications, hospital length of stay and a subgroup analysis to identify causes of surgery delay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients transferred from peripheral hospitals experienced a statistically significant delay in time from presentation to surgery compared to those presenting directly to the operating centre (42 h vs. 24 h, p < 0.001) and were more likely to be outside of current guidelines for NOF fixation within 36 h of presentation (OR 5.1, p < 0.001). There were no differences in mortality at 1 year between the two groups (15% vs. 18%, p = 0.5). On subgroup analysis, distance from the operating centre, time to x-ray and after-hours presentation were associated with increased likelihood of surgery outside of 36 h in the peripheral hospital group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores an inequity in service delivery for rural patients with NOF fractures, particularly those requiring transfer. Pre-arrival delays necessitate targeted interventions to address diagnostic service delays, logistical challenges and transport issues in rural health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.13200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to investigate in patients over 65 with neck of femur (NOF) fractures in Rural Australia, does initial presentation to a peripheral hospital result in a delay to surgery?
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Dubba Base Hospital, Trauma Hospital Rural Australia (Modified Monash Model (MMM) 3) and catchment area (MMM 3-7), NSW, Australia.
Participants: The study includes 350 patients over 65, presenting with closed, unilateral NOF fractures who underwent operative management at the operating centre, 203 from peripheral hospitals.
Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes include time to surgery and adherence to recommended timeframes for NOF fixation. Secondary outcomes encompass complications, hospital length of stay and a subgroup analysis to identify causes of surgery delay.
Results: Patients transferred from peripheral hospitals experienced a statistically significant delay in time from presentation to surgery compared to those presenting directly to the operating centre (42 h vs. 24 h, p < 0.001) and were more likely to be outside of current guidelines for NOF fixation within 36 h of presentation (OR 5.1, p < 0.001). There were no differences in mortality at 1 year between the two groups (15% vs. 18%, p = 0.5). On subgroup analysis, distance from the operating centre, time to x-ray and after-hours presentation were associated with increased likelihood of surgery outside of 36 h in the peripheral hospital group.
Conclusion: This study underscores an inequity in service delivery for rural patients with NOF fractures, particularly those requiring transfer. Pre-arrival delays necessitate targeted interventions to address diagnostic service delays, logistical challenges and transport issues in rural health care.
研究目的本研究旨在调查澳大利亚农村地区65岁以上股骨颈(NOF)骨折患者首次到周边医院就诊是否会导致手术时间延迟?回顾性队列研究:研究地点:澳大利亚新南威尔士州杜巴基地医院、澳大利亚农村地区创伤医院(莫纳什修正模型(MMM)3)和集水区(MMM 3-7):该研究包括350名65岁以上的闭合性单侧NOF骨折患者,他们在手术中心接受了手术治疗,其中203人来自周边医院:主要结果:主要结果包括手术时间和NOF固定的建议时限。次要结果包括并发症、住院时间和一项亚组分析,以确定手术延迟的原因:结果:与直接到手术中心就诊的患者相比,从外围医院转来的患者从就诊到手术的时间出现了统计学意义上的显著延迟(42 h vs. 24 h, p 结论:该研究强调了手术时间的不公平:本研究强调了为农村 NOF 骨折患者,尤其是需要转院的患者提供服务的不公平现象。有必要对到达前的延误采取有针对性的干预措施,以解决农村医疗保健中的诊断服务延误、后勤挑战和转运问题。
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.