High-concentrated platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus placebo in osteoarthritis in the thumb base: study protocol for an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08636-2
Johanna von Kieseritzky, Maria Wilcke
{"title":"High-concentrated platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus placebo in osteoarthritis in the thumb base: study protocol for an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Johanna von Kieseritzky, Maria Wilcke","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08636-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoarthritis in the thumb base (trapeziometacarpal joint, CMC-1 joint) is prevalent, particularly among middle-aged and elderly women, causing significant disability. Conservative treatments, including steroid injections, have been questioned for their efficacy, prompting exploration into alternative therapies such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections. This randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of high-concentration PRP (platelet-rich plasma) injection compared to saline (placebo) in reducing pain and disability in patients with thumb base osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients meeting inclusion criteria will be randomized and blinded, with injections administered under sterile conditions and radiological guidance. With a planned sample size of 90 patients recruited from the Department of Hand Surgery at Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, the study will assess pain relief and functional improvement at 3, 6, and 12 months post-injection. The primary outcome measure is pain on load (numerical rating scale) at 6 months, with secondary outcomes including patient-reported outcomes, key pinch, grip strength, abduction of the thumb, and time to intervention within 1 year. Statistical analyses will employ non-parametric tests, chi-square tests, and generalized estimating equations to compare outcomes between the PRP and placebo groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study aims to provide evidence regarding the efficacy of high-concentration PRP injections for thumb base osteoarthritis. If PRP proves superior to saline in reducing pain and improving function, it could offer a promising alternative treatment. Conversely, if PRP does not demonstrate significant benefits over placebo, its use for this condition is not justified. This study seeks to address the current gap in evidence regarding the efficacy of PRP injections for thumb base osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study has been approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2023-06860-01 and 2024-01238-02) and is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06193499) 2024-01-04.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"797"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08636-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis in the thumb base (trapeziometacarpal joint, CMC-1 joint) is prevalent, particularly among middle-aged and elderly women, causing significant disability. Conservative treatments, including steroid injections, have been questioned for their efficacy, prompting exploration into alternative therapies such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections. This randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of high-concentration PRP (platelet-rich plasma) injection compared to saline (placebo) in reducing pain and disability in patients with thumb base osteoarthritis.

Methods: Patients meeting inclusion criteria will be randomized and blinded, with injections administered under sterile conditions and radiological guidance. With a planned sample size of 90 patients recruited from the Department of Hand Surgery at Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, the study will assess pain relief and functional improvement at 3, 6, and 12 months post-injection. The primary outcome measure is pain on load (numerical rating scale) at 6 months, with secondary outcomes including patient-reported outcomes, key pinch, grip strength, abduction of the thumb, and time to intervention within 1 year. Statistical analyses will employ non-parametric tests, chi-square tests, and generalized estimating equations to compare outcomes between the PRP and placebo groups.

Discussion: The study aims to provide evidence regarding the efficacy of high-concentration PRP injections for thumb base osteoarthritis. If PRP proves superior to saline in reducing pain and improving function, it could offer a promising alternative treatment. Conversely, if PRP does not demonstrate significant benefits over placebo, its use for this condition is not justified. This study seeks to address the current gap in evidence regarding the efficacy of PRP injections for thumb base osteoarthritis.

Trial registration: The study has been approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2023-06860-01 and 2024-01238-02) and is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06193499) 2024-01-04.

高浓度富血小板血浆(PRP)与安慰剂治疗拇指基部骨关节炎:评估者盲法随机对照试验研究方案。
背景:拇指基部(梯形掌关节,CMC-1 关节)骨关节炎很普遍,尤其是在中老年妇女中,造成严重残疾。包括类固醇注射在内的保守疗法的疗效受到质疑,这促使人们探索富血小板血浆(PRP)注射等替代疗法。这项随机、双盲、对照试验旨在评估高浓度 PRP(富血小板血浆)注射与生理盐水(安慰剂)相比,在减轻拇指基骨关节炎患者疼痛和残疾方面的效果:将对符合纳入标准的患者进行随机和盲法治疗,在无菌条件和放射学指导下进行注射。研究将评估注射后 3、6 和 12 个月的疼痛缓解情况和功能改善情况。主要结果指标是 6 个月时的负重疼痛(数字评分量表),次要结果包括患者报告的结果、关键捏力、握力、拇指外展以及 1 年内的干预时间。统计分析将采用非参数检验、卡方检验和广义估计方程来比较 PRP 组和安慰剂组的结果:该研究旨在为高浓度 PRP 注射治疗拇指基部骨关节炎的疗效提供证据。如果 PRP 在减轻疼痛和改善功能方面优于生理盐水,那么它将成为一种很有前景的替代治疗方法。反之,如果 PRP 没有显示出明显优于安慰剂的疗效,则没有理由使用 PRP 治疗这种疾病。本研究旨在填补目前有关 PRP 注射治疗拇指基骨关节炎疗效的证据空白:该研究已获得瑞典伦理审查局批准(2023-06860-01 和 2024-01238-02),并在 ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06193499) 2024-01-04 上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信