Felix Lakomek, Falk Hilsmann, Erik Schiffner, Sebastian Gehrmann, Dominique Schöps, Max Prost, Joachim Windolf, David Latz
{"title":"[Doctor, when can I drive? Characterization of driving behavior of orthopedic and trauma surgery patients using a prospective questionnaire study].","authors":"Felix Lakomek, Falk Hilsmann, Erik Schiffner, Sebastian Gehrmann, Dominique Schöps, Max Prost, Joachim Windolf, David Latz","doi":"10.1007/s00113-024-01502-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individual mobility in road traffic is of high importance in Germany, both individually and socioeconomically; however, diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system in particular can lead to temporary impairments. The aim of this prospective patient survey was to record how patients assessed their driving capability during an injury and the associated immobilization and on what basis the decision on driving capability was made on the part of the patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic questionnaire was used to analyze a total of 100 patients with a diagnosis in orthopedics/trauma surgery and associated joint immobilization. In addition to personal data and the injuries/illnesses, an analysis on risk tolerance was performed and patients were asked about their knowledge regarding driving capability. Finally, it was recorded which patients drove a motor vehicle and for what reasons despite immobilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 40.2% reported knowledge of the applicable laws regarding driving capability and 55.6% considered the treating physician to be responsible regarding the decision on driving capability. The patients who drove a motor vehicle reported higher personal and professional dependence on the motor vehicle (personal: 60.6% vs. 45.7%; professional: 48.5% vs. 36.1%). In the group of patients who drove a motor vehicle during immobilization, overall a fracture was less likely to be the reason for immobilization (33.3% vs. 51.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the patient population rated their knowledge of the law as low and viewed the treating physician as having the majority of the decision-making responsibility regarding driving capability. The patients who drove a motor vehicle during immobilization reported a higher personal as well as professional dependence on driving a motor vehicle. At the same time the injury severity had an influence on the decision, so that patients with fractures were more likely to avoid driving a motor vehicle. Further studies, particularly at the biomechanical level, are needed to ensure a better basis for the physician in making decisions with respect to the driving capability of orthopedic and trauma surgery patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-024-01502-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Individual mobility in road traffic is of high importance in Germany, both individually and socioeconomically; however, diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system in particular can lead to temporary impairments. The aim of this prospective patient survey was to record how patients assessed their driving capability during an injury and the associated immobilization and on what basis the decision on driving capability was made on the part of the patients.
Material and methods: A systematic questionnaire was used to analyze a total of 100 patients with a diagnosis in orthopedics/trauma surgery and associated joint immobilization. In addition to personal data and the injuries/illnesses, an analysis on risk tolerance was performed and patients were asked about their knowledge regarding driving capability. Finally, it was recorded which patients drove a motor vehicle and for what reasons despite immobilization.
Results: Overall, 40.2% reported knowledge of the applicable laws regarding driving capability and 55.6% considered the treating physician to be responsible regarding the decision on driving capability. The patients who drove a motor vehicle reported higher personal and professional dependence on the motor vehicle (personal: 60.6% vs. 45.7%; professional: 48.5% vs. 36.1%). In the group of patients who drove a motor vehicle during immobilization, overall a fracture was less likely to be the reason for immobilization (33.3% vs. 51.0%).
Conclusion: Overall, the patient population rated their knowledge of the law as low and viewed the treating physician as having the majority of the decision-making responsibility regarding driving capability. The patients who drove a motor vehicle during immobilization reported a higher personal as well as professional dependence on driving a motor vehicle. At the same time the injury severity had an influence on the decision, so that patients with fractures were more likely to avoid driving a motor vehicle. Further studies, particularly at the biomechanical level, are needed to ensure a better basis for the physician in making decisions with respect to the driving capability of orthopedic and trauma surgery patients.