Dorte E Jarbøl, Sanne Rasmussen, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, Jesper Lykkegaard, Linda Juel Ahrenfeldt, Gitte B Lauridsen, Peter Haastrup
{"title":"Exploring colorectal cancer patients' diagnostic pathways and general practitioners' assessment of the diagnostic processes: a Danish survey study.","authors":"Dorte E Jarbøl, Sanne Rasmussen, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, Jesper Lykkegaard, Linda Juel Ahrenfeldt, Gitte B Lauridsen, Peter Haastrup","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2024.2432376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most common cancers and the prognosis of CRC is highly dependent on stage at diagnosis. Although many cases are diagnosed swiftly, there is still room for improvement.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to explore CRC diagnostic pathways, encompassing (1) place of initial contact; (2) associations with symptom presentations, sex, and age with events in the diagnostic process and initial referrals and (3) the general practitioner's (GP's) evaluation of the diagnostic processes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All GPs in North-, Central-, and Southern Denmark were invited to fill in questionnaires for their listed patients diagnosed with cancer during the past two years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,032 recorded CRC patients, 65% had their initial contact in general practice, 5% within the out-of hours service, 10% in the hospital, and 20% were diagnosed based on screening. A total of 27% of CRC patients over 40 who initially presented in general practice were treated or referred on suspicion of another disease first, and 9% were reported to have had hesitated in seeking medical attention. Some 37% presented solely non-specific symptoms, increasing the odds of the GP advising watchful waiting (OR 2.48; 95% CI 1.06-5.81), treating or referring on the suspicion of another illness first (OR 2.57; 95% CI 1.76-3.75), wait due to normal findings (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.16-3.85), or referring to diagnostic imaging (OR 3.07; 95% CI 1.63-5.79). The GPs assessed nearly one fifth of the diagnostic processes as poor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most CRC patients are diagnosed with initial presentation in general practice. Having non-specific symptoms is common and challenges timely diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2432376","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most common cancers and the prognosis of CRC is highly dependent on stage at diagnosis. Although many cases are diagnosed swiftly, there is still room for improvement.
Aim: We aimed to explore CRC diagnostic pathways, encompassing (1) place of initial contact; (2) associations with symptom presentations, sex, and age with events in the diagnostic process and initial referrals and (3) the general practitioner's (GP's) evaluation of the diagnostic processes.
Methods: All GPs in North-, Central-, and Southern Denmark were invited to fill in questionnaires for their listed patients diagnosed with cancer during the past two years.
Results: Among 1,032 recorded CRC patients, 65% had their initial contact in general practice, 5% within the out-of hours service, 10% in the hospital, and 20% were diagnosed based on screening. A total of 27% of CRC patients over 40 who initially presented in general practice were treated or referred on suspicion of another disease first, and 9% were reported to have had hesitated in seeking medical attention. Some 37% presented solely non-specific symptoms, increasing the odds of the GP advising watchful waiting (OR 2.48; 95% CI 1.06-5.81), treating or referring on the suspicion of another illness first (OR 2.57; 95% CI 1.76-3.75), wait due to normal findings (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.16-3.85), or referring to diagnostic imaging (OR 3.07; 95% CI 1.63-5.79). The GPs assessed nearly one fifth of the diagnostic processes as poor.
Conclusion: Most CRC patients are diagnosed with initial presentation in general practice. Having non-specific symptoms is common and challenges timely diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice.
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include:
• Clinical family medicine
• Epidemiological research
• Qualitative research
• Health services research.