Health system efficiency and equity in ASEAN: an empirical investigation.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Yaqing Liu, Liwen Gong, Haoran Niu, Feng Jiang, Sixian Du, Yiyun Jiang
{"title":"Health system efficiency and equity in ASEAN: an empirical investigation.","authors":"Yaqing Liu, Liwen Gong, Haoran Niu, Feng Jiang, Sixian Du, Yiyun Jiang","doi":"10.1186/s12962-024-00588-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Equity and efficiency are two fundamental principles for the sound development of health systems, as advocated by the World Health Organization (WHO). Despite the notable progress made by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in advancing their health systems, gaps persist in achieving global health goals. This paper examines the efficiency of health system stages and the fairness of health resource distribution in ASEAN countries, analyzes the underlying causes of the existing gaps, and suggests potential solutions to bridge them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data spanning 2011 to 2019, sourced from the WHO Global Health Observatory and the World Bank Database, form the foundation of this study. This study employs an enhanced two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) to assess the efficiency of health system stages in ASEAN countries. Equity in health resource distribution is evaluated using health resource agglomeration degree and concentration curves across demographic, geographic, and economic aspects. Furthermore, the Entropy-Weighted TOPSIS method is utilized to integrate equity across these dimensions, measuring the overall fairness in health resource allocation across different countries. Finally, rankings of health system fairness and efficiency are compared to assess the overall development level of health systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall efficiency of the ASEAN health systems from 2011 to 2019 averaged 0.231, with an upward trend in the first stage efficiency at 0.559 and a downward trend in the second stage at 0.502. The health resource agglomeration degree indicated that Singapore, Brunei, and Malaysia had HRAD and HRPD values significantly greater than 1, and Cambodia, Myanmar, and Laos predominantly had indices significantly less than 1. The concentration curve for hospital beds was the closest to the line of absolute equity. During the study period, the health resource concentration curve increasingly approached absolute equity, shifting from above to below the concentration curve. Singapore, Brunei, and Malaysia consistently remained in the first quadrant of the quadrant plot, and Myanmar and Cambodia were consistently in the third quadrant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASEAN countries face two key challenges in their healthcare systems: first, while many nations such as Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam have improved resource allocation efficiency, this hasn't yet translated into better health services. To address this, establishing national health sector steering committees, focusing on workforce training and retention, and implementing centralized monitoring systems are crucial. Second, there is a growing disparity in healthcare development across ASEAN. Promoting balanced resource distribution and leveraging ASEAN's economic integration for regional collaboration will help bridge these gaps and foster more equitable healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"22 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-024-00588-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Equity and efficiency are two fundamental principles for the sound development of health systems, as advocated by the World Health Organization (WHO). Despite the notable progress made by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in advancing their health systems, gaps persist in achieving global health goals. This paper examines the efficiency of health system stages and the fairness of health resource distribution in ASEAN countries, analyzes the underlying causes of the existing gaps, and suggests potential solutions to bridge them.

Methods: Data spanning 2011 to 2019, sourced from the WHO Global Health Observatory and the World Bank Database, form the foundation of this study. This study employs an enhanced two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) to assess the efficiency of health system stages in ASEAN countries. Equity in health resource distribution is evaluated using health resource agglomeration degree and concentration curves across demographic, geographic, and economic aspects. Furthermore, the Entropy-Weighted TOPSIS method is utilized to integrate equity across these dimensions, measuring the overall fairness in health resource allocation across different countries. Finally, rankings of health system fairness and efficiency are compared to assess the overall development level of health systems.

Results: The overall efficiency of the ASEAN health systems from 2011 to 2019 averaged 0.231, with an upward trend in the first stage efficiency at 0.559 and a downward trend in the second stage at 0.502. The health resource agglomeration degree indicated that Singapore, Brunei, and Malaysia had HRAD and HRPD values significantly greater than 1, and Cambodia, Myanmar, and Laos predominantly had indices significantly less than 1. The concentration curve for hospital beds was the closest to the line of absolute equity. During the study period, the health resource concentration curve increasingly approached absolute equity, shifting from above to below the concentration curve. Singapore, Brunei, and Malaysia consistently remained in the first quadrant of the quadrant plot, and Myanmar and Cambodia were consistently in the third quadrant.

Conclusion: ASEAN countries face two key challenges in their healthcare systems: first, while many nations such as Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam have improved resource allocation efficiency, this hasn't yet translated into better health services. To address this, establishing national health sector steering committees, focusing on workforce training and retention, and implementing centralized monitoring systems are crucial. Second, there is a growing disparity in healthcare development across ASEAN. Promoting balanced resource distribution and leveraging ASEAN's economic integration for regional collaboration will help bridge these gaps and foster more equitable healthcare systems.

背景:公平和效率是世界卫生组织(WHO)倡导的健全卫生系统发展的两大基本原则。尽管东南亚国家联盟(东盟)在推进其卫生系统方面取得了显著进展,但在实现全球卫生目标方面仍存在差距。本文研究了东盟国家卫生系统各阶段的效率和卫生资源分配的公平性,分析了造成现有差距的根本原因,并提出了缩小差距的潜在解决方案:本研究的基础数据来自世界卫生组织全球卫生观察站和世界银行数据库,时间跨度为 2011 年至 2019 年。本研究采用增强型两阶段数据包络分析法(DEA)评估东盟国家卫生系统各阶段的效率。利用卫生资源集聚程度和人口、地理和经济方面的集中曲线来评估卫生资源分配的公平性。此外,还利用熵加权 TOPSIS 方法整合这些维度的公平性,衡量不同国家卫生资源分配的整体公平性。最后,通过比较卫生系统公平性和效率的排名来评估卫生系统的整体发展水平:从 2011 年到 2019 年,东盟卫生系统的整体效率平均为 0.231,第一阶段效率为 0.559,呈上升趋势,第二阶段效率为 0.502,呈下降趋势。卫生资源集聚度表明,新加坡、文莱和马来西亚的 HRAD 和 HRPD 值显著大于 1,柬埔寨、缅甸和老挝的指数主要显著小于 1,医院床位的集聚曲线最接近绝对公平线。在研究期间,卫生资源集中曲线越来越接近绝对公平线,从集中曲线的上方转到下方。新加坡、文莱和马来西亚始终位于曲线的第一象限,缅甸和柬埔寨始终位于第三象限:东盟国家的医疗保健系统面临两大挑战:首先,虽然印尼、泰国和越南等许多国家提高了资源分配效率,但这尚未转化为更好的医疗服务。为解决这一问题,建立国家卫生部门指导委员会、重视劳动力培训和保留以及实施中央监控系统至关重要。其次,东盟各国医疗卫生发展的差距越来越大。促进资源的均衡分配,利用东盟的经济一体化促进地区合作,将有助于缩小这些差距,建立更加公平的医疗保健体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信