Previous Surgical Exposure and the Onset of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Propensity-Matched Case-Control Analysis Nested Within the UK Biobank Cohort.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ben Grodzinski, Daniel J Stubbs, Benjamin M Davies
{"title":"Previous Surgical Exposure and the Onset of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Propensity-Matched Case-Control Analysis Nested Within the UK Biobank Cohort.","authors":"Ben Grodzinski, Daniel J Stubbs, Benjamin M Davies","doi":"10.1177/21925682241304335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case-control study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is a progressive neurological condition caused by mechanical stress on the cervical spine. Surgical exposure in the preceding months to a DCM diagnosis is a common theme of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) discussions. Such a relationship has biological plausibility (e.g. neck positioning, cord perfusion) but evidence to support this association is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed UK Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data for participants in the UK BioBank cohort. We defined cases as those episodes with a primary diagnosis of DCM and generated controls using non-DCM HES episodes. Cases and controls were propensity score-matched by age, sex and date of episode, and a directed acyclic graph was used to robustly control for confounders. We defined the exposure as any surgical procedure under general or regional anaesthetic occurring within the 6-24 months prior to the episode.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analysed 806 DCM and 2287432 non-DCM hospital episodes. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio (95% CI) for the effect of a binarised (0 vs ≥ 1) exposure on risk of developing DCM was 1.20 (1.02-1.41), and for categorised (0 vs 1 and 0 vs ≥ 2) exposure was 1.11 (0.882-1.39) & 1.33 (1.075-1.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports the patient narrative of surgery as a risk factor for the development of DCM. The association displays temporality, dose-response relationship, and biological plausibility. Further work is needed to confirm this in other cohorts, explore mediating mechanisms, and identify those at greatest risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682241304335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241304335","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Case-control study.

Objectives: Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is a progressive neurological condition caused by mechanical stress on the cervical spine. Surgical exposure in the preceding months to a DCM diagnosis is a common theme of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) discussions. Such a relationship has biological plausibility (e.g. neck positioning, cord perfusion) but evidence to support this association is lacking.

Methods: We analysed UK Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data for participants in the UK BioBank cohort. We defined cases as those episodes with a primary diagnosis of DCM and generated controls using non-DCM HES episodes. Cases and controls were propensity score-matched by age, sex and date of episode, and a directed acyclic graph was used to robustly control for confounders. We defined the exposure as any surgical procedure under general or regional anaesthetic occurring within the 6-24 months prior to the episode.

Results: We analysed 806 DCM and 2287432 non-DCM hospital episodes. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio (95% CI) for the effect of a binarised (0 vs ≥ 1) exposure on risk of developing DCM was 1.20 (1.02-1.41), and for categorised (0 vs 1 and 0 vs ≥ 2) exposure was 1.11 (0.882-1.39) & 1.33 (1.075-1.65).

Conclusions: This study supports the patient narrative of surgery as a risk factor for the development of DCM. The association displays temporality, dose-response relationship, and biological plausibility. Further work is needed to confirm this in other cohorts, explore mediating mechanisms, and identify those at greatest risk.

既往手术暴露与颈椎退行性脊髓病的发病:英国生物库队列中的倾向匹配病例对照分析。
研究设计:病例对照研究:研究目的:病例对照研究:颈椎退行性脊髓病(DCM)是一种由颈椎机械应力引起的渐进性神经系统疾病。在诊断出 DCM 之前的几个月内接受过手术是 "患者与公众参与"(Patient and Public Involvement,PPI)讨论的一个共同主题。这种关系具有生物学上的合理性(如颈部定位、脊髓灌注),但缺乏支持这种关联的证据:我们分析了英国 BioBank 队列中参与者的英国医院病例统计 (HES) 数据。我们将病例定义为主要诊断为 DCM 的病例,并使用非 DCM HES 病例生成对照。病例和对照组按年龄、性别和发病日期进行倾向评分匹配,并使用有向无环图对混杂因素进行稳健控制。我们将暴露定义为发病前 6-24 个月内发生的任何全身或局部麻醉下的外科手术:我们分析了 806 例 DCM 和 2287432 例非 DCM 住院病例。通过多变量逻辑回归分析,二值化(0 vs ≥ 1)暴露对罹患 DCM 风险影响的几率比(95% CI)为 1.20(1.02-1.41),分类(0 vs 1 和 0 vs ≥ 2)暴露的几率比(95% CI)为 1.11(0.882-1.39)和 1.33(1.075-1.65):本研究支持患者关于手术是 DCM 发病风险因素的说法。这种关联具有时间性、剂量反应关系和生物学合理性。还需要在其他队列中开展进一步的工作来证实这一点、探索中介机制并确定风险最大的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信