Efficacy of tezepelumab in patients with severe asthma and persistent airflow obstruction.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00164-2024
Elliot Israel, Mario Castro, Christopher S Ambrose, Jean-Pierre Llanos, Nestor A Molfino, Nicole L Martin, Sandhia S Ponnarambil, Neil Martin
{"title":"Efficacy of tezepelumab in patients with severe asthma and persistent airflow obstruction.","authors":"Elliot Israel, Mario Castro, Christopher S Ambrose, Jean-Pierre Llanos, Nestor A Molfino, Nicole L Martin, Sandhia S Ponnarambil, Neil Martin","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00164-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent airflow obstruction (PAO) in patients with asthma can be difficult to treat. Tezepelumab blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin, an epithelial cytokine implicated in asthma pathogenesis. This analysis evaluated the efficacy of tezepelumab in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and PAO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PATHWAY (phase 2b) and NAVIGATOR (phase 3) were multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. This <i>post hoc</i> analysis included PATHWAY and NAVIGATOR patients who received tezepelumab 210 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Change from baseline to week 52 in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) and the annualised asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) over 52 weeks were assessed in patients with and without PAO (post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/forced vital capacity ratio <0.7) at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1334 included patients, 782 (58.6%) had PAO at baseline. At week 52, greater improvements in pre-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub> from baseline were observed in tezepelumab <i>versus</i> placebo recipients with PAO (least-squares (LS) mean 0.24 <i>versus</i> 0.07 L; difference 0.17 L, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.11-0.23) and without PAO (LS mean 0.20 <i>versus</i> 0.12 L; difference 0.08 L, 95% CI: 0.01-0.15). Tezepelumab reduced the AAER <i>versus</i> placebo by 61% (95% CI: 51-69) and 56% (95% CI: 42-67) in patients with and without PAO, respectively. For patients with PAO at baseline, the proportion without PAO at week 52 was higher with tezepelumab (12.1%) than placebo (6.6%) (odds ratio 1.96, 95% CI: 1.30-2.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tezepelumab improved lung function and reduced exacerbations <i>versus</i> placebo in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma with and without PAO.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"10 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00164-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Persistent airflow obstruction (PAO) in patients with asthma can be difficult to treat. Tezepelumab blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin, an epithelial cytokine implicated in asthma pathogenesis. This analysis evaluated the efficacy of tezepelumab in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and PAO.

Methods: PATHWAY (phase 2b) and NAVIGATOR (phase 3) were multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. This post hoc analysis included PATHWAY and NAVIGATOR patients who received tezepelumab 210 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Change from baseline to week 52 in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and the annualised asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) over 52 weeks were assessed in patients with and without PAO (post-bronchodilator FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio <0.7) at baseline.

Results: Of the 1334 included patients, 782 (58.6%) had PAO at baseline. At week 52, greater improvements in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 from baseline were observed in tezepelumab versus placebo recipients with PAO (least-squares (LS) mean 0.24 versus 0.07 L; difference 0.17 L, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.11-0.23) and without PAO (LS mean 0.20 versus 0.12 L; difference 0.08 L, 95% CI: 0.01-0.15). Tezepelumab reduced the AAER versus placebo by 61% (95% CI: 51-69) and 56% (95% CI: 42-67) in patients with and without PAO, respectively. For patients with PAO at baseline, the proportion without PAO at week 52 was higher with tezepelumab (12.1%) than placebo (6.6%) (odds ratio 1.96, 95% CI: 1.30-2.94).

Conclusion: Tezepelumab improved lung function and reduced exacerbations versus placebo in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma with and without PAO.

替塞单抗对严重哮喘和持续气流阻塞患者的疗效。
背景:哮喘患者的持续气流阻塞(PAO)很难治疗。替塞单抗可阻断胸腺基质淋巴细胞生成素,这是一种与哮喘发病机制有关的上皮细胞因子。本分析评估了替塞普鲁单抗对严重、未受控制的哮喘和 PAO 患者的疗效:PATHWAY(2b 期)和 NAVIGATOR(3 期)是多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。这项事后分析包括PATHWAY和NAVIGATOR患者,他们在52周内每4周接受210毫克替塞单抗或安慰剂治疗。评估了有PAO和无PAO患者支气管扩张前1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)从基线到第52周的变化以及52周内的年化哮喘加重率(AAER)(支气管扩张后FEV1/用力呼气容积比值结果):在纳入的 1334 名患者中,有 782 人(58.6%)在基线时患有 PAO。第52周时,观察到有PAO(最小二乘法(LS)平均值为0.24 L对0.07 L;差值为0.17 L,95%置信区间(CI):0.11-0.23)和无PAO(LS平均值为0.20 L对0.12 L;差值为0.08 L,95%置信区间(CI):0.01-0.15)的特非普鲁单抗与安慰剂受试者相比,支气管舒张前FEV1较基线有更大改善。Tezepelumab 与安慰剂相比,在有 PAO 和无 PAO 的患者中,AAER 分别降低了 61% (95% CI: 51-69) 和 56% (95% CI: 42-67)。对于基线时有PAO的患者,第52周时无PAO的比例使用替塞单抗(12.1%)高于安慰剂(6.6%)(几率比1.96,95% CI:1.30-2.94):结论:与安慰剂相比,替塞单抗可改善伴有或不伴有PAO的未受控制的重症哮喘患者的肺功能并减少病情恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信