What Perioperative Factors Are Associated With High-risk Daily Morphine Milligram Equivalent Totals in Spinal Decompressions?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Eeric Truumees, Ashley Duncan, Devender Singh, Matthew J Geck, Ebubechi Adindu, John K Stokes
{"title":"What Perioperative Factors Are Associated With High-risk Daily Morphine Milligram Equivalent Totals in Spinal Decompressions?","authors":"Eeric Truumees, Ashley Duncan, Devender Singh, Matthew J Geck, Ebubechi Adindu, John K Stokes","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine what factors are associated with high-risk daily morphine milligram equivalent (MME) totals in patients undergoing spinal decompression.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Daily dosages of ≥100 MME/d are associated with an almost 9-fold increased risk of overdose. Current general recommendations endorse the lowest effective dose and ≤50 MME/d.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis was conducted on 260 patients who underwent spinal decompressive surgery. Average MME/d was calculated as the sum of qualifying inpatient MMEs administered divided by the sum of inpatient length of stay. Independent variables across demographic, clinical, and surgical domains were subject to comparative and logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall MME per day was 54.19 ± 39.37, with a range of 1.67-218.34 MME/d. Sixty-six patients were determined to have \"high-risk MME.\" These patients were significantly younger (58.8 ± 13.1 vs 70.53 ± 11.5; P < 0.001) and reported higher preoperative pain visual analog scale (VAS; 4.8 ± 3 vs 2.8 ± 3.3; P = 0.0021) than the patients at low risk. In addition, high-risk patients had significantly higher body mass indexes (BMIs; P < 0.05) and received ketamine as part of anesthesia (P < 0.05). Patients who consumed high-risk dosages of MMEs in the perioperative period were more likely to have been on opioids before surgery and to report higher pain scores at 4-6 week follow-ups (P < 0.05). The final logistics regression model identified independent risk factors to be younger age, higher BMIs and preoperative VAS, and prior use of opioids and intraoperative ketamine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with high MME per day who underwent spinal decompression were significantly younger with higher BMIs and preoperative VAS with an increased incidence of preoperative opioid use and intraoperative ketamine. A closer look at interaction models revealed that a combination of high preoperative pain and intraoperative ketamine usage were at a significantly increased risk of higher MME consumption. Preoperative opioid risk education and mitigation strategies should be considered in patients with high MME risk, especially in younger patients already utilizing opioids before surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design/setting: Retrospective cohort analysis.

Objective: To determine what factors are associated with high-risk daily morphine milligram equivalent (MME) totals in patients undergoing spinal decompression.

Background: Daily dosages of ≥100 MME/d are associated with an almost 9-fold increased risk of overdose. Current general recommendations endorse the lowest effective dose and ≤50 MME/d.

Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on 260 patients who underwent spinal decompressive surgery. Average MME/d was calculated as the sum of qualifying inpatient MMEs administered divided by the sum of inpatient length of stay. Independent variables across demographic, clinical, and surgical domains were subject to comparative and logistic regression analysis.

Results: Overall MME per day was 54.19 ± 39.37, with a range of 1.67-218.34 MME/d. Sixty-six patients were determined to have "high-risk MME." These patients were significantly younger (58.8 ± 13.1 vs 70.53 ± 11.5; P < 0.001) and reported higher preoperative pain visual analog scale (VAS; 4.8 ± 3 vs 2.8 ± 3.3; P = 0.0021) than the patients at low risk. In addition, high-risk patients had significantly higher body mass indexes (BMIs; P < 0.05) and received ketamine as part of anesthesia (P < 0.05). Patients who consumed high-risk dosages of MMEs in the perioperative period were more likely to have been on opioids before surgery and to report higher pain scores at 4-6 week follow-ups (P < 0.05). The final logistics regression model identified independent risk factors to be younger age, higher BMIs and preoperative VAS, and prior use of opioids and intraoperative ketamine.

Conclusions: Patients with high MME per day who underwent spinal decompression were significantly younger with higher BMIs and preoperative VAS with an increased incidence of preoperative opioid use and intraoperative ketamine. A closer look at interaction models revealed that a combination of high preoperative pain and intraoperative ketamine usage were at a significantly increased risk of higher MME consumption. Preoperative opioid risk education and mitigation strategies should be considered in patients with high MME risk, especially in younger patients already utilizing opioids before surgery.

哪些围手术期因素与脊柱减压术中的高风险每日吗啡毫克当量总量有关?
研究设计/设置:回顾性队列分析:确定哪些因素与脊柱减压术患者每日吗啡毫克当量(MME)总量的高风险相关:背景:每日吗啡剂量≥100 毫克/天时,用药过量的风险几乎会增加 9 倍。目前的一般建议认可最低有效剂量,即≤50 MME/d:对 260 名接受脊柱减压手术的患者进行了回顾性分析。平均 MME/d 的计算方法是将符合条件的住院 MMEs 总和除以住院时间总和。对人口统计学、临床和手术领域的独立变量进行了比较和逻辑回归分析:总的每日 MME 为 54.19 ± 39.37,范围为 1.67-218.34 MME/d。有 66 名患者被确定为 "高风险 MME"。与低风险患者相比,这些患者明显更年轻(58.8 ± 13.1 vs 70.53 ± 11.5;P < 0.001),术前疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS;4.8 ± 3 vs 2.8 ± 3.3;P = 0.0021)也更高。此外,高风险患者的体重指数(BMI;P < 0.05)明显更高,并且在麻醉过程中使用氯胺酮(P < 0.05)。在围手术期服用高风险剂量MMEs的患者更有可能在术前服用阿片类药物,并且在4-6周的随访中报告疼痛评分更高(P < 0.05)。最终的物流回归模型确定了年龄较小、体重指数和术前VAS较高、术前使用过阿片类药物和术中氯胺酮等独立风险因素:结论:接受脊柱减压术的每日MME高的患者明显更年轻,BMI和术前VAS更高,术前使用阿片类药物和术中使用氯胺酮的发生率更高。对交互作用模型的进一步研究表明,术前疼痛程度高和术中使用氯胺酮的组合会显著增加MME消耗量升高的风险。术前阿片类药物风险教育和缓解策略应考虑用于MME高风险患者,尤其是术前已使用阿片类药物的年轻患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信