A Survey of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Use in the United States.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Natasha Ahn, Matthew Derrick, Walid Hussain
{"title":"A Survey of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Use in the United States.","authors":"Natasha Ahn, Matthew Derrick, Walid Hussain","doi":"10.1055/a-2453-6883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) has become the standard of care in delivering surfactant noninvasively in many parts of the world, particularly throughout Europe; however, centers in the United States have been slower to adopt it. The most recent assessment of the use of MIST in the United States was in 2018 by Kurepa et al. Considering the increasing evidence favoring MIST, this paper reassessed the current rate of utilization and aims to examine barriers to MIST implementation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> A web-based survey was distributed to approximately 4,500 individuals in the American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (AAP SoNPM) mailing list. The questions were aimed at addressing MIST usage in the United States, examining barriers for neonatology providers to implement MIST into their practice, and determining the use of sedation during the MIST procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of the 381 respondents, 39% used MIST as part of their practice, which was an increase from 15% in 2018. The most prevalent barrier to implementation was the lack of procedural training. There was a large increase in the use of sedation for the procedure compared with 2018.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> MIST use among AAP SoNPM respondents has more than doubled since 2018; InSurE (INtubation-SURfactant delivery Extubation) remains the most prevalent method of surfactant delivery in non-intubated patients. The list of different types of barriers and comments provided by respondents can be a resource for units planning to implement MIST.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· The usage of MIST in the United States.. · What are the barriers to MIST implementation?. · The usage of sedation during MIST procedure..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2453-6883","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) has become the standard of care in delivering surfactant noninvasively in many parts of the world, particularly throughout Europe; however, centers in the United States have been slower to adopt it. The most recent assessment of the use of MIST in the United States was in 2018 by Kurepa et al. Considering the increasing evidence favoring MIST, this paper reassessed the current rate of utilization and aims to examine barriers to MIST implementation.

Study design:  A web-based survey was distributed to approximately 4,500 individuals in the American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (AAP SoNPM) mailing list. The questions were aimed at addressing MIST usage in the United States, examining barriers for neonatology providers to implement MIST into their practice, and determining the use of sedation during the MIST procedure.

Results:  Of the 381 respondents, 39% used MIST as part of their practice, which was an increase from 15% in 2018. The most prevalent barrier to implementation was the lack of procedural training. There was a large increase in the use of sedation for the procedure compared with 2018.

Conclusion:  MIST use among AAP SoNPM respondents has more than doubled since 2018; InSurE (INtubation-SURfactant delivery Extubation) remains the most prevalent method of surfactant delivery in non-intubated patients. The list of different types of barriers and comments provided by respondents can be a resource for units planning to implement MIST.

Key points: · The usage of MIST in the United States.. · What are the barriers to MIST implementation?. · The usage of sedation during MIST procedure..

美国微创表面活性剂使用情况调查。
目的:微创表面活化剂疗法(MIST)已成为世界上许多地区,尤其是整个欧洲,以无创方式提供表面活化剂的护理标准;然而,美国的中心采用这种疗法的速度较慢。最近一次对美国 MIST 使用情况的评估是 2018 年由 Kurepa 等人进行的。考虑到越来越多的证据支持 MIST,本文重新评估了当前的使用率,并旨在研究 MIST 实施的障碍:向美国儿科学会新生儿-围产期医学分会(AAP SoNPM)邮件列表中的约 4500 名个人分发了一份网络调查。问题的目的是了解 MIST 在美国的使用情况,研究新生儿科医疗机构在实践中实施 MIST 的障碍,并确定在 MIST 过程中使用镇静剂的情况:在381名受访者中,39%的人将MIST作为其实践的一部分,比2018年的15%有所增加。最普遍的实施障碍是缺乏程序培训。与 2018 年相比,在手术中使用镇静剂的比例大幅增加:自 2018 年以来,AAP SoNPM 受访者中 MIST 的使用率增加了一倍多;InSurE(插管-表面活性物质输送拔管)仍然是非插管患者中最普遍的表面活性物质输送方法。受访者提供的不同类型的障碍和意见清单可作为计划实施 MIST 的单位的资源:- 美国 MIST 的使用情况。- 实施 MIST 有哪些障碍?- 在 MIST 过程中使用镇静剂的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信