{"title":"A Survey of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Use in the United States.","authors":"Natasha Ahn, Matthew Derrick, Walid Hussain","doi":"10.1055/a-2453-6883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) has become the standard of care in delivering surfactant noninvasively in many parts of the world, particularly throughout Europe; however, centers in the United States have been slower to adopt it. The most recent assessment of the use of MIST in the United States was in 2018 by Kurepa et al. Considering the increasing evidence favoring MIST, this paper reassessed the current rate of utilization and aims to examine barriers to MIST implementation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> A web-based survey was distributed to approximately 4,500 individuals in the American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (AAP SoNPM) mailing list. The questions were aimed at addressing MIST usage in the United States, examining barriers for neonatology providers to implement MIST into their practice, and determining the use of sedation during the MIST procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of the 381 respondents, 39% used MIST as part of their practice, which was an increase from 15% in 2018. The most prevalent barrier to implementation was the lack of procedural training. There was a large increase in the use of sedation for the procedure compared with 2018.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> MIST use among AAP SoNPM respondents has more than doubled since 2018; InSurE (INtubation-SURfactant delivery Extubation) remains the most prevalent method of surfactant delivery in non-intubated patients. The list of different types of barriers and comments provided by respondents can be a resource for units planning to implement MIST.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· The usage of MIST in the United States.. · What are the barriers to MIST implementation?. · The usage of sedation during MIST procedure..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2453-6883","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) has become the standard of care in delivering surfactant noninvasively in many parts of the world, particularly throughout Europe; however, centers in the United States have been slower to adopt it. The most recent assessment of the use of MIST in the United States was in 2018 by Kurepa et al. Considering the increasing evidence favoring MIST, this paper reassessed the current rate of utilization and aims to examine barriers to MIST implementation.
Study design: A web-based survey was distributed to approximately 4,500 individuals in the American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (AAP SoNPM) mailing list. The questions were aimed at addressing MIST usage in the United States, examining barriers for neonatology providers to implement MIST into their practice, and determining the use of sedation during the MIST procedure.
Results: Of the 381 respondents, 39% used MIST as part of their practice, which was an increase from 15% in 2018. The most prevalent barrier to implementation was the lack of procedural training. There was a large increase in the use of sedation for the procedure compared with 2018.
Conclusion: MIST use among AAP SoNPM respondents has more than doubled since 2018; InSurE (INtubation-SURfactant delivery Extubation) remains the most prevalent method of surfactant delivery in non-intubated patients. The list of different types of barriers and comments provided by respondents can be a resource for units planning to implement MIST.
Key points: · The usage of MIST in the United States.. · What are the barriers to MIST implementation?. · The usage of sedation during MIST procedure..
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.