Predicting Drug-Polymer Compatibility in Amorphous Solid Dispersions by MD Simulation: On the Trap of Solvation Free Energies.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
T Higginbotham, K Meier, J Ramírez, A Garaizar
{"title":"Predicting Drug-Polymer Compatibility in Amorphous Solid Dispersions by MD Simulation: On the Trap of Solvation Free Energies.","authors":"T Higginbotham, K Meier, J Ramírez, A Garaizar","doi":"10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) are a prevalent method for increasing the bioavailability and apparent solubility of poorly soluble drugs. Consequently, extensive research, encompassing both experimental and computational approaches, has been dedicated to developing methods for assessing the key factors influencing their stability, notably drug-polymer interactions. A common computational approach to rank the compatibility of a drug with a set of solvents or polymers is to compare thermodynamic observables, such as solvation free energies at infinite dilution. However, the impact of the molecular weight of the polymer excipient on these interactions remains underexplored. This study delves into this impact through atomistic simulations of Indomethacin in PVP(-VA) and HPMC, and through simulations using a coarse-grained model, emphasizing its critical importance. First, we demonstrate that the molecular weight of the polymer plays a pivotal role in determining the solvation free energy of the drug, at times exerting a more significant influence than the specific chemical identity of the polymer. Additionally, our simulations suggest that higher molecular weight polymers lead to lower solvation free energies and, thus, suggest better compatibility with the drug. Yet, the lower free energy of solvation of the drug in longer polymers does not translate into a higher solubility. This work highlights the subtle role polymer molecular weight plays when measuring thermodynamic observables in amorphous solid dispersions, a role which must be considered when optimizing pharmaceutical formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":52,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Pharmaceutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00810","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) are a prevalent method for increasing the bioavailability and apparent solubility of poorly soluble drugs. Consequently, extensive research, encompassing both experimental and computational approaches, has been dedicated to developing methods for assessing the key factors influencing their stability, notably drug-polymer interactions. A common computational approach to rank the compatibility of a drug with a set of solvents or polymers is to compare thermodynamic observables, such as solvation free energies at infinite dilution. However, the impact of the molecular weight of the polymer excipient on these interactions remains underexplored. This study delves into this impact through atomistic simulations of Indomethacin in PVP(-VA) and HPMC, and through simulations using a coarse-grained model, emphasizing its critical importance. First, we demonstrate that the molecular weight of the polymer plays a pivotal role in determining the solvation free energy of the drug, at times exerting a more significant influence than the specific chemical identity of the polymer. Additionally, our simulations suggest that higher molecular weight polymers lead to lower solvation free energies and, thus, suggest better compatibility with the drug. Yet, the lower free energy of solvation of the drug in longer polymers does not translate into a higher solubility. This work highlights the subtle role polymer molecular weight plays when measuring thermodynamic observables in amorphous solid dispersions, a role which must be considered when optimizing pharmaceutical formulations.

无定形固体分散体(ASDs)是提高难溶性药物生物利用度和表观溶解度的常用方法。因此,包括实验和计算方法在内的大量研究都致力于开发评估影响其稳定性的关键因素的方法,特别是药物与聚合物之间的相互作用。对药物与一组溶剂或聚合物的相容性进行排序的常用计算方法是比较热力学观测值,如无限稀释时的溶解自由能。然而,聚合物辅料的分子量对这些相互作用的影响仍未得到充分探讨。本研究通过对吲哚美辛在 PVP(-VA)和 HPMC 中的原子模拟,并使用粗粒度模型进行模拟,深入探讨了这种影响,并强调了其至关重要性。首先,我们证明了聚合物的分子量在决定药物溶解自由能方面起着关键作用,有时其影响比聚合物的具体化学特性更为显著。此外,我们的模拟结果表明,分子量越高的聚合物溶解自由能越低,因此与药物的相容性越好。然而,较长聚合物中较低的药物溶解自由能并不能转化为较高的溶解度。这项研究强调了聚合物分子量在测量无定形固体分散体的热力学观测值时所发挥的微妙作用,在优化药物制剂时必须考虑到这一作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Molecular Pharmaceutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
391
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Pharmaceutics publishes the results of original research that contributes significantly to the molecular mechanistic understanding of drug delivery and drug delivery systems. The journal encourages contributions describing research at the interface of drug discovery and drug development. Scientific areas within the scope of the journal include physical and pharmaceutical chemistry, biochemistry and biophysics, molecular and cellular biology, and polymer and materials science as they relate to drug and drug delivery system efficacy. Mechanistic Drug Delivery and Drug Targeting research on modulating activity and efficacy of a drug or drug product is within the scope of Molecular Pharmaceutics. Theoretical and experimental peer-reviewed research articles, communications, reviews, and perspectives are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信