{"title":"Anatomic feasibility of a novel modular triple-branched endograft for patients with aortic arch pathologies.","authors":"Zelin Niu, Long Cao, Wei Guo, Hongpeng Zhang","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2433718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the anatomical feasibility of a novel modular triple-branched endograft for aortic arch diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 314 patients with aortic arch pathologies treated at a single center from January 2018 to December 2023. Preoperative computed tomography angiography images were analyzed with three-dimensional reconstruction to quantify anatomical features. Feasibility was based on endograft anatomical criteria, and logistic regression identified risk factors for unsuitability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 132 patients included in the study, 67.4% were deemed anatomically suitable for the triple-branched device. A total of 36 (27.3%) patients were deemed inapplicable due to a large diameter of the proximal landing zone, 12 (9%) patients due to a small diameter of the left common carotid artery, and 1 (0.8%) patient due to a small diameter of the left subclavian artery. Logistic regression identified large proximal landing zone diameter and small left common carotid artery diameter were significant factors for unsuitability (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.002, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel triple-branched endograft demonstrated promising anatomical feasibility in two-thirds of patients. However, anatomical constraints limited its applicability. Future device iterations should focus on accommodating a broader range of anatomical variations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1219-1225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2433718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the anatomical feasibility of a novel modular triple-branched endograft for aortic arch diseases.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 314 patients with aortic arch pathologies treated at a single center from January 2018 to December 2023. Preoperative computed tomography angiography images were analyzed with three-dimensional reconstruction to quantify anatomical features. Feasibility was based on endograft anatomical criteria, and logistic regression identified risk factors for unsuitability.
Results: Out of 132 patients included in the study, 67.4% were deemed anatomically suitable for the triple-branched device. A total of 36 (27.3%) patients were deemed inapplicable due to a large diameter of the proximal landing zone, 12 (9%) patients due to a small diameter of the left common carotid artery, and 1 (0.8%) patient due to a small diameter of the left subclavian artery. Logistic regression identified large proximal landing zone diameter and small left common carotid artery diameter were significant factors for unsuitability (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively).
Conclusions: The novel triple-branched endograft demonstrated promising anatomical feasibility in two-thirds of patients. However, anatomical constraints limited its applicability. Future device iterations should focus on accommodating a broader range of anatomical variations.