Jason E Bloom, Vishal Goel, David Anderson, Susie Cartledge, Ziad Nehme, Jocasta Ball, Amminadab Eliakundu, William Chan, Derek P Chew, David M Kaye, Dion Stub
{"title":"Current Emergency Medical Service Vasoactive Use for the Management of Shock.","authors":"Jason E Bloom, Vishal Goel, David Anderson, Susie Cartledge, Ziad Nehme, Jocasta Ball, Amminadab Eliakundu, William Chan, Derek P Chew, David M Kaye, Dion Stub","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to describe the indications for vasoactive medication administration, hemodynamic treatment targets, and specific agents used by various international emergency medical service (EMS) providers.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>In March 2022, we sent an online survey comprising of 20 questions to Medical Directors of EMSs across Australia, the Asia Pacific region, and North America.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 108 EMS directors were emailed an invitation to participate.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Twenty-five EMS medical directors responded. Local site guidelines for vasoactive agent administration were available to 77.3% of providers. Epinephrine was commonly used as first-line vasoactive agent in 52% of questionnaire respondents, followed by norepinephrine (22%), dopamine (18%), and metaraminol (4%). Epinephrine was the most commonly used vasoactive agent across all forms of shock, with a higher proportion of utilization in cases of cardiogenic shock (58%) and patients suffering shock following cardiac arrest (56%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>International EMS vasoactive use in the management of shock is heterogeneous. Future randomized controlled trials should aim to elucidate optimal prehospital treatment strategies for shock, including the initiation, choice of agent, and monitoring of vasoactive medication.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"6 12","pages":"e1177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to describe the indications for vasoactive medication administration, hemodynamic treatment targets, and specific agents used by various international emergency medical service (EMS) providers.
Design and setting: In March 2022, we sent an online survey comprising of 20 questions to Medical Directors of EMSs across Australia, the Asia Pacific region, and North America.
Patients: A total of 108 EMS directors were emailed an invitation to participate.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Twenty-five EMS medical directors responded. Local site guidelines for vasoactive agent administration were available to 77.3% of providers. Epinephrine was commonly used as first-line vasoactive agent in 52% of questionnaire respondents, followed by norepinephrine (22%), dopamine (18%), and metaraminol (4%). Epinephrine was the most commonly used vasoactive agent across all forms of shock, with a higher proportion of utilization in cases of cardiogenic shock (58%) and patients suffering shock following cardiac arrest (56%).
Conclusions: International EMS vasoactive use in the management of shock is heterogeneous. Future randomized controlled trials should aim to elucidate optimal prehospital treatment strategies for shock, including the initiation, choice of agent, and monitoring of vasoactive medication.