Assessment of percutaneous closure for decannulation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective study.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-24 DOI:10.1177/11297298241300119
Diana Martins-Fernandes, João Rocha-Neves, Ana Rita Ferreira, Hélio Martins, Sérgio Gaião, José Artur Paiva
{"title":"Assessment of percutaneous closure for decannulation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective study.","authors":"Diana Martins-Fernandes, João Rocha-Neves, Ana Rita Ferreira, Hélio Martins, Sérgio Gaião, José Artur Paiva","doi":"10.1177/11297298241300119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the evidence supporting the use of Perclose Proglide<sup>®</sup> (PP) suture-mediated vascular closure devices in various clinical scenarios, limited evidence exists regarding its role in percutaneous arterial closure of the femoral artery after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Compared to conventional methods, this study evaluates the effectiveness and complications of bedside percutaneous femoral artery closure using Perclose ProGlide (PP) for VA-ECMO decannulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort of consecutive patients managed with mechanical circulatory support VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock, who survived decannulation between January 2017 and August 2023. A comparison between PP and other decannulation strategies was established to evaluate the effectiveness and procedure-related complications of bedside percutaneous femoral artery closure using a PP with a post-closure technique compared to conventional approaches of surgical and manual decannulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 122 patients decannulated from VA-ECMO with a mean age of 48.6 ± 13.1 and 78 (63.9) males, 49.2% comprised the PP group. Despite the older age (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (<i>p</i> = 0.045), the PP group had a larger number of patients free from decannulation-related adverse events. Additionally, a higher haemoglobin level 24 h post decannulation (<i>p</i> = 0.047), with no difference in terms of transfusion of red blood cells between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.263) was found. The pseudoaneurysm was the most frequently reported complication, while the arterial cannulation surgical wound site infection was only documented in the open repair subgroup. A trend towards reduced Intensive Care (ICU) and hospital length of stay after decannulation was noted, although it did not reach statistical significance. There was no difference in mortality between both groups and no procedure-related deaths occurred. A mean of 2.7 PP devices were required to achieve complete haemostasis in the PP cohort, where technical failure was documented in four cases (6.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bedside Percutaneous decannulation of VA-ECMO using a PP device with a post-closure technique is safe and reliable for achieving effective haemostasis, with fewer vascular complications than conventional approaches and a low device failure rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"1651-1660"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241300119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the evidence supporting the use of Perclose Proglide® (PP) suture-mediated vascular closure devices in various clinical scenarios, limited evidence exists regarding its role in percutaneous arterial closure of the femoral artery after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Compared to conventional methods, this study evaluates the effectiveness and complications of bedside percutaneous femoral artery closure using Perclose ProGlide (PP) for VA-ECMO decannulation.

Methods: Retrospective cohort of consecutive patients managed with mechanical circulatory support VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock, who survived decannulation between January 2017 and August 2023. A comparison between PP and other decannulation strategies was established to evaluate the effectiveness and procedure-related complications of bedside percutaneous femoral artery closure using a PP with a post-closure technique compared to conventional approaches of surgical and manual decannulation.

Results: Among 122 patients decannulated from VA-ECMO with a mean age of 48.6 ± 13.1 and 78 (63.9) males, 49.2% comprised the PP group. Despite the older age (p = 0.021) and higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (p = 0.045), the PP group had a larger number of patients free from decannulation-related adverse events. Additionally, a higher haemoglobin level 24 h post decannulation (p = 0.047), with no difference in terms of transfusion of red blood cells between groups (p = 0.263) was found. The pseudoaneurysm was the most frequently reported complication, while the arterial cannulation surgical wound site infection was only documented in the open repair subgroup. A trend towards reduced Intensive Care (ICU) and hospital length of stay after decannulation was noted, although it did not reach statistical significance. There was no difference in mortality between both groups and no procedure-related deaths occurred. A mean of 2.7 PP devices were required to achieve complete haemostasis in the PP cohort, where technical failure was documented in four cases (6.7%).

Conclusions: Bedside Percutaneous decannulation of VA-ECMO using a PP device with a post-closure technique is safe and reliable for achieving effective haemostasis, with fewer vascular complications than conventional approaches and a low device failure rate.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合经皮闭合术的评估:回顾性研究。
背景:尽管有证据支持在各种临床情况下使用Perclose Proglide® (PP)缝合血管闭合装置,但有关其在静脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)后经皮股动脉闭合中的作用的证据却很有限。与传统方法相比,本研究评估了使用Perclose ProGlide(PP)进行床旁经皮股动脉闭合以解除VA-ECMO的有效性和并发症:回顾性队列:在2017年1月至2023年8月期间,使用机械循环支持VA-ECMO治疗难治性心源性休克的连续患者,这些患者均在解禁后存活。研究人员对PP和其他注药策略进行了比较,以评估使用PP和后闭合技术进行床旁经皮股动脉闭合与传统手术和人工注药方法相比的有效性和手术相关并发症:在122名平均年龄为48.6±13.1岁、78名(63.9)男性的VA-ECMO拔管患者中,49.2%为PP组。尽管PP组患者年龄较大(p = 0.021),动脉高血压发病率较高(p = 0.045),但有更多患者未发生与拔管相关的不良事件。此外,解封后 24 小时血红蛋白水平较高(p = 0.047),但各组间输注红细胞的情况无差异(p = 0.263)。假性动脉瘤是最常报告的并发症,而动脉插管手术伤口部位感染只有在开放式修复亚组中才有记录。虽然没有达到统计学意义,但我们注意到在取消套管后,重症监护室(ICU)和住院时间有缩短的趋势。两组患者的死亡率没有差异,也没有发生与手术相关的死亡病例。PP组平均需要2.7个PP装置才能实现完全止血,其中4例(6.7%)出现技术故障:结论:与传统方法相比,使用 PP 装置和后闭合技术对 VA-ECMO 进行床旁经皮止血安全可靠,能有效止血,血管并发症少,装置故障率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信