Beta-Blocker Use in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Q1 Medicine
Doménica Herrera Hernández, Bárbara Abreu, Tania Siu Xiao, Andreina Rojas, Kevin López Romero, Valentina Contreras, Sol Villa Nogueyra, Zulma Sosa, Samantha M Alvarez, Camila Sánchez Cruz, Ernesto Calderón Martinez
{"title":"Beta-Blocker Use in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Doménica Herrera Hernández, Bárbara Abreu, Tania Siu Xiao, Andreina Rojas, Kevin López Romero, Valentina Contreras, Sol Villa Nogueyra, Zulma Sosa, Samantha M Alvarez, Camila Sánchez Cruz, Ernesto Calderón Martinez","doi":"10.3390/medsci12040064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of beta-blockers in the perioperative period has been widely investigated due to their potential to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and mortality; yet their overall impact on various postoperative outcomes remains debated. This study constitutes a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of beta-blockers on mortality, MI, stroke, and other adverse effects such as hypotension and bradycardia in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Searches were performed across PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases; we included randomized controlled trials and cohort and case-control studies published from 1999 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included data from 28 studies encompassing 1,342,430 patients. Perioperative beta-blockers were associated with a significant increase in stroke risk (RR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.97, <i>p</i> = 0.03, I<sup>2</sup> = 62%). However, no statistically significant association was found between beta-blocker use and mortality (RR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.01, <i>p</i> = 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 100%). Subgroup analyses revealed a protective effect on mortality for patients with high risks, such as patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, chronic heart failure, and other arrhythmias. For myocardial infarction (RR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.28, <i>p</i> = 0.36, I<sup>2</sup> = 86%), a reduction in events was observed in the subgroup of randomized controlled trials. Beta-blockers significantly increased the risk of hypotension (RR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.70, <i>p</i> < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 25%) and bradycardia (RR 2.26, 95% CI: 1.37 to 3.74, <i>p</i> < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 64%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Perioperative beta-blockers show increasing rates of stroke events following non-cardiac surgery but do not significantly impact the incidence of MI or mortality. The increased risks of hypotension and bradycardia necessitate careful patient selection and monitoring. Future research should aim to refine patient selection criteria and optimize perioperative management to balance the benefits and risks of beta-blocker use in surgical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci12040064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of beta-blockers in the perioperative period has been widely investigated due to their potential to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and mortality; yet their overall impact on various postoperative outcomes remains debated. This study constitutes a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of beta-blockers on mortality, MI, stroke, and other adverse effects such as hypotension and bradycardia in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Methods: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Searches were performed across PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases; we included randomized controlled trials and cohort and case-control studies published from 1999 to 2024.

Results: This meta-analysis included data from 28 studies encompassing 1,342,430 patients. Perioperative beta-blockers were associated with a significant increase in stroke risk (RR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.97, p = 0.03, I2 = 62%). However, no statistically significant association was found between beta-blocker use and mortality (RR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.01, p = 0.05, I2 = 100%). Subgroup analyses revealed a protective effect on mortality for patients with high risks, such as patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, chronic heart failure, and other arrhythmias. For myocardial infarction (RR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.28, p = 0.36, I2 = 86%), a reduction in events was observed in the subgroup of randomized controlled trials. Beta-blockers significantly increased the risk of hypotension (RR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.70, p < 0.01, I2 = 25%) and bradycardia (RR 2.26, 95% CI: 1.37 to 3.74, p < 0.01, I2 = 64%).

Conclusions: Perioperative beta-blockers show increasing rates of stroke events following non-cardiac surgery but do not significantly impact the incidence of MI or mortality. The increased risks of hypotension and bradycardia necessitate careful patient selection and monitoring. Future research should aim to refine patient selection criteria and optimize perioperative management to balance the benefits and risks of beta-blocker use in surgical settings.

非心脏手术患者使用β-受体阻滞剂:系统综述与元分析》。
背景:由于β-受体阻滞剂具有降低主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)和死亡率的潜力,因此在围手术期使用β-受体阻滞剂已被广泛研究;但其对各种术后结果的总体影响仍存在争议。本研究对β-受体阻滞剂对非心脏手术患者的死亡率、心肌梗死、中风和其他不良反应(如低血压和心动过缓)的影响进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析:根据 PRISMA 2020 指南进行了全面的系统综述和荟萃分析。在 PubMed、Cochrane、Web of Science、Scopus、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 数据库中进行了检索;我们纳入了 1999 年至 2024 年间发表的随机对照试验、队列研究和病例对照研究:这项荟萃分析纳入了 28 项研究的数据,涉及 1,342,430 名患者。围手术期β-受体阻滞剂与卒中风险的显著增加有关(RR 1.42,95% CI:1.03 至 1.97,P = 0.03,I2 = 62%)。然而,β-受体阻滞剂的使用与死亡率之间并无统计学意义(RR 0.62,95% CI:0.38 至 1.01,P = 0.05,I2 = 100%)。亚组分析显示,对高危患者,如心房颤动、慢性心力衰竭和其他心律失常患者,β-受体阻滞剂对其死亡率有保护作用。就心肌梗死而言(RR 0.82,95% CI:0.53 至 1.28,P = 0.36,I2 = 86%),随机对照试验亚组中观察到事件减少。β-受体阻滞剂会明显增加低血压(RR 1.46,95% CI:1.26 至 1.70,p < 0.01,I2 = 25%)和心动过缓(RR 2.26,95% CI:1.37 至 3.74,p < 0.01,I2 = 64%)的风险:围术期使用β-受体阻滞剂会增加非心脏手术后中风事件的发生率,但不会对心肌梗死或死亡率产生显著影响。由于低血压和心动过缓的风险增加,因此有必要谨慎选择和监测患者。未来的研究应旨在完善患者选择标准和优化围手术期管理,以平衡手术环境中使用β-受体阻滞剂的益处和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信