Long-term outcomes for women after dilator therapy with or without surgery in the creation of a neovagina.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yi Ying Koh, Brigitte Gerstl, Andrea Sit, Jacoline Heller-Boersma, Jana Koch, Yi-Ping Juan, Rebecca Deans
{"title":"Long-term outcomes for women after dilator therapy with or without surgery in the creation of a neovagina.","authors":"Yi Ying Koh, Brigitte Gerstl, Andrea Sit, Jacoline Heller-Boersma, Jana Koch, Yi-Ping Juan, Rebecca Deans","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaginal aplasia or hypoplasia often requires the creation of a neovagina using vaginal dilation therapy, vaginoplasty surgery, or a combination of both. However, the absence of validated guidelines and the controversy surrounding vaginoplasty surgery have limited our understanding of the long-term outcomes and impact on quality of life and psychosexual functioning for women with a short or absent vagina. This study provides valuable insights into the Australian context, reflecting the treatment approaches and long-term psychosocial outcomes for this patient group.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the long-term effects of vaginal dilation, with or without vaginoplasty surgery, on quality of life and psychosexual functioning in women diagnosed with a short or absent vagina.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed-methods design was employed, utilising validated psychometric tools and a semi-structured interview. The study included patients with disorders of sex development aged above 16 who underwent vaginal dilator therapy between 2012 and 2020, as well as healthy age-matched controls. The research was conducted at a single tertiary hospital in Sydney, NSW, Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was completed by 30 participants, including 11 non-surgical cases, four surgical cases, and 15 controls. The mean age at inclusion was 30.8 ± 14.1 years. The non-surgical group exhibited significantly higher scores indicating a greater 'need for help' compared to the surgical group (30.0 ± 19.3 and 4.5 ± 9.0; P = 0.0121). No other statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Choice of treatment should consider various factors, including patient preference and responsiveness to treatment. These findings emphasise the importance of personalised care in the Australian context and highlight the need for further research, particularly with larger and more homogenous sample sizes, to enhance clinical decision-making in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13899","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vaginal aplasia or hypoplasia often requires the creation of a neovagina using vaginal dilation therapy, vaginoplasty surgery, or a combination of both. However, the absence of validated guidelines and the controversy surrounding vaginoplasty surgery have limited our understanding of the long-term outcomes and impact on quality of life and psychosexual functioning for women with a short or absent vagina. This study provides valuable insights into the Australian context, reflecting the treatment approaches and long-term psychosocial outcomes for this patient group.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the long-term effects of vaginal dilation, with or without vaginoplasty surgery, on quality of life and psychosexual functioning in women diagnosed with a short or absent vagina.

Materials and methods: A mixed-methods design was employed, utilising validated psychometric tools and a semi-structured interview. The study included patients with disorders of sex development aged above 16 who underwent vaginal dilator therapy between 2012 and 2020, as well as healthy age-matched controls. The research was conducted at a single tertiary hospital in Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Results: The questionnaire was completed by 30 participants, including 11 non-surgical cases, four surgical cases, and 15 controls. The mean age at inclusion was 30.8 ± 14.1 years. The non-surgical group exhibited significantly higher scores indicating a greater 'need for help' compared to the surgical group (30.0 ± 19.3 and 4.5 ± 9.0; P = 0.0121). No other statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups.

Conclusion: Choice of treatment should consider various factors, including patient preference and responsiveness to treatment. These findings emphasise the importance of personalised care in the Australian context and highlight the need for further research, particularly with larger and more homogenous sample sizes, to enhance clinical decision-making in this population.

妇女在接受扩张器治疗后,无论是否进行了新阴道创建手术,均可获得长期疗效。
背景:阴道缺失或发育不良通常需要通过阴道扩张疗法、阴道成形术或两者相结合的方法来重建阴道。然而,由于缺乏有效的指导原则以及围绕阴道成形手术的争议,限制了我们对阴道短小或缺失女性的长期治疗效果及其对生活质量和性心理功能影响的了解。这项研究为我们了解澳大利亚的情况提供了宝贵的资料,反映了这一患者群体的治疗方法和长期社会心理结果。目的:这项研究旨在评估阴道扩张术(无论是否进行阴道成形术)对被诊断为阴道短小或无阴道的妇女的生活质量和性心理功能的长期影响:采用混合方法设计,利用经过验证的心理测量工具和半结构式访谈。研究对象包括 2012 年至 2020 年期间接受阴道扩张器治疗的 16 岁以上性发育障碍患者,以及年龄匹配的健康对照组。研究在澳大利亚新南威尔士州悉尼市的一家三甲医院进行:30名参与者填写了问卷,其中包括11名非手术病例、4名手术病例和15名对照组。参与者的平均年龄为 30.8 ± 14.1 岁。非手术组的得分明显高于手术组(30.0 ± 19.3 和 4.5 ± 9.0;P = 0.0121),表明 "需要帮助 "的程度更高。结论:选择治疗方法时应考虑各种因素:结论:选择治疗方法应考虑各种因素,包括患者的偏好和对治疗的反应。这些研究结果强调了在澳大利亚进行个性化护理的重要性,并突出了进一步研究的必要性,尤其是在样本量更大、更均匀的情况下,以加强该人群的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信