Concordance of Traumatic Brain Injury Symptoms, Evaluation, and Diagnosis Between Teens and Parents: Data From the National Health Interview Survey-Teen.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Lindsey I Black, Amanda E Ng, Benjamin Zablotsky, Alexis Peterson, Jill Daugherty, Dana Waltzman, Jonaki Bose
{"title":"Concordance of Traumatic Brain Injury Symptoms, Evaluation, and Diagnosis Between Teens and Parents: Data From the National Health Interview Survey-Teen.","authors":"Lindsey I Black, Amanda E Ng, Benjamin Zablotsky, Alexis Peterson, Jill Daugherty, Dana Waltzman, Jonaki Bose","doi":"10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.10.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate differences in teen-reported and parent-reported lifetime prevalence estimates of traumatic brain injury (TBI) symptoms, TBI evaluation, and TBI diagnosis among a nationally representative sample of teenagers aged 12-17 years old and their parents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Parent-reported data from the 2021 to 2022 National Health Interview Survey linked with teen-reported data from the National Health Interview Survey-Teen July 2021-December 2022 (n = 1,153) were analyzed. Lifetime prevalence estimates for TBI symptoms (e.g., selected symptoms as a result of a blow or jolt to the head), history of evaluation by health professional for TBI (i.e., TBI evaluation), and TBI diagnosis stratified by sociodemographic characteristics and reporter type were produced, and z-tests were conducted to test for differences. Concordance measures were calculated to assess agreement between teen and parent survey responses to TBI measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lifetime prevalence of TBI symptoms varied by reporter type across all sociodemographic characteristics with teen-report consistently producing higher estimates. Estimates of TBI evaluation varied by reporter type only among older teens, non-Hispanic teens, and teens who participated in sports; there was no difference for TBI diagnosis. Percent agreement between the 2 reporters ranged from 73% to 95%, prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa ranged from 0.45 to 0.90, and Cohen's kappa ranged from 0.22 to 0.63.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There was general agreement for observable outcomes TBI evaluation and TBI diagnosis, but discordance existed in reports of TBI symptoms. These findings suggest that youth self-report of TBI symptoms may enhance surveillance efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":56278,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescent Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.10.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate differences in teen-reported and parent-reported lifetime prevalence estimates of traumatic brain injury (TBI) symptoms, TBI evaluation, and TBI diagnosis among a nationally representative sample of teenagers aged 12-17 years old and their parents.

Methods: Parent-reported data from the 2021 to 2022 National Health Interview Survey linked with teen-reported data from the National Health Interview Survey-Teen July 2021-December 2022 (n = 1,153) were analyzed. Lifetime prevalence estimates for TBI symptoms (e.g., selected symptoms as a result of a blow or jolt to the head), history of evaluation by health professional for TBI (i.e., TBI evaluation), and TBI diagnosis stratified by sociodemographic characteristics and reporter type were produced, and z-tests were conducted to test for differences. Concordance measures were calculated to assess agreement between teen and parent survey responses to TBI measures.

Results: Lifetime prevalence of TBI symptoms varied by reporter type across all sociodemographic characteristics with teen-report consistently producing higher estimates. Estimates of TBI evaluation varied by reporter type only among older teens, non-Hispanic teens, and teens who participated in sports; there was no difference for TBI diagnosis. Percent agreement between the 2 reporters ranged from 73% to 95%, prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa ranged from 0.45 to 0.90, and Cohen's kappa ranged from 0.22 to 0.63.

Discussion: There was general agreement for observable outcomes TBI evaluation and TBI diagnosis, but discordance existed in reports of TBI symptoms. These findings suggest that youth self-report of TBI symptoms may enhance surveillance efforts.

青少年与父母在创伤性脑损伤症状、评估和诊断方面的一致性:全国青少年健康访谈调查数据
目的:在具有全国代表性的 12-17 岁青少年及其父母样本中,调查青少年报告和父母报告的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)症状、TBI 评估和 TBI 诊断的终生流行率估计值之间的差异:方法:分析了 2021 年至 2022 年全国健康访谈调查中家长报告的数据和 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 12 月全国健康访谈调查青少年报告的数据(n = 1,153 人)。根据社会人口特征和报告人类型对创伤性脑损伤症状(如头部受到撞击或颠簸导致的某些症状)、创伤性脑损伤专业医疗人员评估史(即创伤性脑损伤评估)和创伤性脑损伤诊断进行分层,得出终生患病率估计值,并进行z检验以检验差异。通过计算一致性测量来评估青少年和家长对创伤性脑损伤测量的调查回答之间的一致性:在所有社会人口特征中,TBI 症状的终生流行率因报告者类型而异,青少年报告的估计值一直较高。只有在年龄较大的青少年、非西班牙裔青少年和参加体育运动的青少年中,对创伤性脑损伤评估的估计值因报告人类型而异;对创伤性脑损伤诊断的估计值则没有差异。两名报告者之间的一致性百分比从 73% 到 95% 不等,流行率调整偏差调整卡帕从 0.45 到 0.90 不等,科恩卡帕从 0.22 到 0.63 不等:在可观察到的结果方面,创伤性脑损伤评估和创伤性脑损伤诊断结果基本一致,但在创伤性脑损伤症状报告方面存在不一致。这些研究结果表明,青少年自我报告创伤后应激症状可加强监测工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescent Health
Journal of Adolescent Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.90%
发文量
526
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Adolescent Health is a scientific publication dedicated to enhancing the health and well-being of adolescents and young adults. Our Journal covers a broad range of research topics, spanning from the basic biological and behavioral sciences to public health and policy. We welcome a variety of contributions, including original research papers, concise reports, literature reviews, clinical case reports, opinion pieces, and letters to the editor. We encourage professionals from diverse disciplines such as Anthropology, Education, Ethics, Global Health, Health Services Research, Law, Medicine, Mental and Behavioral Health, Nursing, Nutrition, Psychology, Public Health and Policy, Social Work, Sociology, and Youth Development to share their expertise and contribute to our mission of promoting adolescent health. Moreover, we value the voices of young individuals, family and community members, and healthcare professionals, and encourage them to submit poetry, personal narratives, images, and other creative works that provide unique insights into the experiences of adolescents and young adults. By combining scientific peer-reviewed research with creative expressions, our Journal aims to create a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities in adolescent and young adult health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信