Periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Nicolas Reina
{"title":"Periprosthetic acetabular fractures.","authors":"Nicolas Reina","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are a major challenge in orthopedics. Proper recognition of these complex cases helps to identify and treat patients with different presentations. These fractures can occur intraoperatively and be treated immediately, or they can occur postoperatively, following trauma or in the context of chronic low bone quality or associated implant loosening. The existing classification systems categorize these fractures as a function of the acetabular cup's stability and the context surrounding the fracture. When a fracture is detected intraoperatively, immediately analyzing its stability is crucial for choosing between a conservative strategy, the need for additional fixation, or the need to change the cup or use of an acetabular reinforcement ring. When the patient has symptoms such as persistent pain or instability, secondary diagnosis of a fracture requires diagnostic imaging. Its treatment depends on the cup's stability, with options ranging from conservative treatment with functional limitations, cup revision potentially combined with stabilization of the fracture site, and also management of potential periprosthetic bone defects. Traumatic fractures require a comprehensive assessment to determine whether the acetabular cup is still stable. The treatment may be conservative or surgical (internal fixation or cup revision). Chronic pelvic discontinuity is associated with bone loss and implant loosening. Acute pelvic discontinuity requires treatment tailored to each patient, often with acetabular rings or custom triflange cups to restore function. This article aims to provide an in-depth review of periprosthetic acetabular fractures, touching on their causes, classification, assessment and treatment, along with specific considerations for fractures diagnosed postoperatively and following acute trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; systematic review of level II-IV studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104068"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are a major challenge in orthopedics. Proper recognition of these complex cases helps to identify and treat patients with different presentations. These fractures can occur intraoperatively and be treated immediately, or they can occur postoperatively, following trauma or in the context of chronic low bone quality or associated implant loosening. The existing classification systems categorize these fractures as a function of the acetabular cup's stability and the context surrounding the fracture. When a fracture is detected intraoperatively, immediately analyzing its stability is crucial for choosing between a conservative strategy, the need for additional fixation, or the need to change the cup or use of an acetabular reinforcement ring. When the patient has symptoms such as persistent pain or instability, secondary diagnosis of a fracture requires diagnostic imaging. Its treatment depends on the cup's stability, with options ranging from conservative treatment with functional limitations, cup revision potentially combined with stabilization of the fracture site, and also management of potential periprosthetic bone defects. Traumatic fractures require a comprehensive assessment to determine whether the acetabular cup is still stable. The treatment may be conservative or surgical (internal fixation or cup revision). Chronic pelvic discontinuity is associated with bone loss and implant loosening. Acute pelvic discontinuity requires treatment tailored to each patient, often with acetabular rings or custom triflange cups to restore function. This article aims to provide an in-depth review of periprosthetic acetabular fractures, touching on their causes, classification, assessment and treatment, along with specific considerations for fractures diagnosed postoperatively and following acute trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; systematic review of level II-IV studies.

髋臼周围假体骨折
髋臼周围假体骨折是骨科的一大难题。正确认识这些复杂病例有助于识别和治疗不同表现的患者。这些骨折可能发生在术中并立即得到治疗,也可能发生在术后、创伤后、慢性骨质疏松或相关植入物松动的情况下。现有的分类系统根据髋臼杯的稳定性和骨折周围的环境对这些骨折进行分类。当术中发现骨折时,立即分析其稳定性对于选择保守策略、是否需要额外固定、是否需要更换髋臼杯或使用髋臼加固环至关重要。当患者出现持续疼痛或不稳定等症状时,骨折的二次诊断需要影像学诊断。其治疗方法取决于髋臼杯的稳定性,可选择功能受限的保守治疗、髋臼杯翻修可能与稳定骨折部位相结合,以及处理潜在的假体周围骨缺损。创伤性骨折需要进行全面评估,以确定髋臼杯是否仍然稳定。治疗方法可以是保守治疗或手术治疗(内固定或髋臼杯翻修)。慢性骨盆不连续与骨质流失和植入物松动有关。急性骨盆不连续需要根据每位患者的具体情况进行治疗,通常使用髋臼环或定制的三法兰髋臼杯来恢复功能。本文旨在深入综述假体周围髋臼骨折,涉及其原因、分类、评估和治疗,以及术后诊断和急性创伤后骨折的具体注意事项。证据级别:IV;对II-IV级研究的系统性回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信