Hybrid registration of the fibula for electromagnetically navigated osteotomies in mandibular reconstructive surgery: a phantom study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
L M N Aukema, A F de Geer, M J A van Alphen, W H Schreuder, R L P van Veen, T J M Ruers, F J Siepel, M B Karakullukcu
{"title":"Hybrid registration of the fibula for electromagnetically navigated osteotomies in mandibular reconstructive surgery: a phantom study.","authors":"L M N Aukema, A F de Geer, M J A van Alphen, W H Schreuder, R L P van Veen, T J M Ruers, F J Siepel, M B Karakullukcu","doi":"10.1007/s11548-024-03282-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In mandibular reconstructive surgery with free fibula flap, 3D-printed patient-specific cutting guides are the current state of the art. Although these guides enable accurate transfer of the virtual surgical plan to the operating room, disadvantages include long waiting times until surgery and the inability to change the virtual plan intraoperatively in case of tumor growth. Alternatively, (electromagnetic) surgical navigation combined with a non-patient-specific cutting guide could be used, requiring accurate image-to-patient registration. In this phantom study, we evaluated the accuracy of a hybrid registration method for the fibula and the additional error that is caused by navigating with a prototype of a novel non-patient-specific cutting guide to virtually planned osteotomy planes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The accuracy of hybrid registration and navigation was assessed in terms of target registration error (TRE), angular difference, and length difference of the intended fibula segments using three 3D-printed fibular phantoms with assessment points on osteotomy planes. Using electromagnetic tracking, hybrid registration was performed with point registration followed by surface registration on the lateral fibular surface. The fibula was fixated in the non-patient-specific cutting guide to navigate to planned osteotomy planes after which the accuracy was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Registration was achieved with a mean TRE, angular difference, and segment length difference of 2.3 ± 0.9 mm, 2.1 ± 1.4°, and 0.3 ± 0.3 mm respectively after hybrid registration. Navigation with the novel cutting guide increased the length difference (0.7 ± 0.6 mm), but decreased the angular difference (1.8 ± 1.3°).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hybrid registration showed to be a feasible and noninvasive method to register the fibula in phantom setup and could be used for electromagnetically navigated osteotomies with a novel non-patient-specific cutting guide. Future studies should focus on testing this registration method in clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":51251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-024-03282-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In mandibular reconstructive surgery with free fibula flap, 3D-printed patient-specific cutting guides are the current state of the art. Although these guides enable accurate transfer of the virtual surgical plan to the operating room, disadvantages include long waiting times until surgery and the inability to change the virtual plan intraoperatively in case of tumor growth. Alternatively, (electromagnetic) surgical navigation combined with a non-patient-specific cutting guide could be used, requiring accurate image-to-patient registration. In this phantom study, we evaluated the accuracy of a hybrid registration method for the fibula and the additional error that is caused by navigating with a prototype of a novel non-patient-specific cutting guide to virtually planned osteotomy planes.

Methods: The accuracy of hybrid registration and navigation was assessed in terms of target registration error (TRE), angular difference, and length difference of the intended fibula segments using three 3D-printed fibular phantoms with assessment points on osteotomy planes. Using electromagnetic tracking, hybrid registration was performed with point registration followed by surface registration on the lateral fibular surface. The fibula was fixated in the non-patient-specific cutting guide to navigate to planned osteotomy planes after which the accuracy was assessed.

Results: Registration was achieved with a mean TRE, angular difference, and segment length difference of 2.3 ± 0.9 mm, 2.1 ± 1.4°, and 0.3 ± 0.3 mm respectively after hybrid registration. Navigation with the novel cutting guide increased the length difference (0.7 ± 0.6 mm), but decreased the angular difference (1.8 ± 1.3°).

Conclusion: Hybrid registration showed to be a feasible and noninvasive method to register the fibula in phantom setup and could be used for electromagnetically navigated osteotomies with a novel non-patient-specific cutting guide. Future studies should focus on testing this registration method in clinical setting.

下颌骨重建手术中电磁导航截骨术的腓骨混合注册:一项模型研究。
目的:在使用游离腓骨瓣进行下颌骨重建手术时,三维打印的患者特异性切割导板是目前最先进的技术。虽然这些导板能将虚拟手术计划准确传送到手术室,但缺点是手术前等待时间较长,而且在肿瘤生长的情况下无法在术中更改虚拟计划。另外,还可以使用(电磁)手术导航与非患者专用的切割导板相结合的方法,但需要精确的图像与患者注册。在这项模型研究中,我们评估了腓骨混合配准方法的准确性,以及使用新型非患者特异性切割导板原型导航到虚拟计划截骨平面所造成的额外误差:方法:使用三个在截骨平面上设有评估点的三维打印腓骨模型,根据目标注册误差(TRE)、角度差和预定腓骨节段的长度差评估了混合注册和导航的准确性。利用电磁追踪技术,在腓骨外侧表面进行点配准和面配准的混合配准。将腓骨固定在非患者专用的切割导板上,导航到计划的截骨平面,然后评估精确度:结果:混合登记后,平均TRE、角度差和节段长度差分别为2.3 ± 0.9 mm、2.1 ± 1.4°和0.3 ± 0.3 mm。使用新型切割导板导航会增加长度差(0.7 ± 0.6 mm),但会减少角度差(1.8 ± 1.3°):混合配准是在模型设置中配准腓骨的一种可行且无创的方法,可用于使用新型非患者特异性切割导板的电磁导航截骨术。未来的研究应侧重于在临床环境中测试这种套准方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (IJCARS) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a platform for closing the gap between medical and technical disciplines, and encourages interdisciplinary research and development activities in an international environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信