Usefulness of the right lateral decubitus push method in endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastric lesions

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Takuya Matsunaga, Naoyuki Tominaga, Shinichi Ogata
{"title":"Usefulness of the right lateral decubitus push method in endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastric lesions","authors":"Takuya Matsunaga,&nbsp;Naoyuki Tominaga,&nbsp;Shinichi Ogata","doi":"10.1111/den.14945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for lesions in the gastric fundus and greater curvature remains challenging owing to difficulties in achieving tangential access with conventional endoscopy, despite the widespread adoption of ESD. Recent reports highlight the need for improved techniques in managing lesions, such as “fundic gland-type gastric cancer” in these regions. Our institution previously introduced the “right lateral decubitus push method” (RPM), wherein the patient is positioned in the right lateral decubitus position, allowing tangential access to the lesion by advancing the endoscope (Fig. 1). This method facilitates a horizontal approach, stabilizes endoscopic operations by increasing the contact area between the endoscope and the gastric wall, and is simple to perform and cost-effective. RPM also permits the use of traction methods<span><sup>1</sup></span> and multibending endoscopes.<span><sup>2</sup></span> However, the method increases the risk of the gastric contents flooding the esophagogastric junction,<span><sup>3</sup></span> necessitating frequent oral suction or the use of an overtube to prevent aspiration pneumonia.<span><sup>4, 5</sup></span> The feasibility and maneuverability of RPM should be assessed preoperatively in each patient, as the method may not be suitable for all patients. We retrospectively compared the treatment outcomes of 16 cases in which ESD was performed using RPM for lesions from the gastric fundus to the upper greater curvature from January 2010 to December 2020, with 10 cases receiving conventional methods (cESD) (Table 1). Although there were no statistically significant differences in treatment outcomes between the groups, the RPM group showed lower rates of postoperative bleeding and intraoperative perforation, as well as shorter operative times versus the cESD group. Aspiration pneumonia was not observed, likely owing to preventive measures. RPM enabled safe and complete ESD for challenging lesions in the gastric fundus and greater curvature that were difficult to access with conventional left lateral decubitus ESD (Video S1). RPM offers a viable alternative for difficult gastric ESDs, improving accessibility and stability during the procedure.</p><p>Authors declare no conflict of interest for this article.</p><p>Approval of the research protocol by an Institutional Reviewer Board: This study was performed with the approval of the Saga Medical Centre Koseikan Ethics Committee (Approval number: 21-03-01-02).</p><p>Informed Consent: In this study, informed consent was obtained from patients using the opt-out method..</p><p>Registry and the Registration No. of the study/trial: N/A.</p><p>Animal Studies: N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":159,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"37 3","pages":"300-301"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/den.14945","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.14945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for lesions in the gastric fundus and greater curvature remains challenging owing to difficulties in achieving tangential access with conventional endoscopy, despite the widespread adoption of ESD. Recent reports highlight the need for improved techniques in managing lesions, such as “fundic gland-type gastric cancer” in these regions. Our institution previously introduced the “right lateral decubitus push method” (RPM), wherein the patient is positioned in the right lateral decubitus position, allowing tangential access to the lesion by advancing the endoscope (Fig. 1). This method facilitates a horizontal approach, stabilizes endoscopic operations by increasing the contact area between the endoscope and the gastric wall, and is simple to perform and cost-effective. RPM also permits the use of traction methods1 and multibending endoscopes.2 However, the method increases the risk of the gastric contents flooding the esophagogastric junction,3 necessitating frequent oral suction or the use of an overtube to prevent aspiration pneumonia.4, 5 The feasibility and maneuverability of RPM should be assessed preoperatively in each patient, as the method may not be suitable for all patients. We retrospectively compared the treatment outcomes of 16 cases in which ESD was performed using RPM for lesions from the gastric fundus to the upper greater curvature from January 2010 to December 2020, with 10 cases receiving conventional methods (cESD) (Table 1). Although there were no statistically significant differences in treatment outcomes between the groups, the RPM group showed lower rates of postoperative bleeding and intraoperative perforation, as well as shorter operative times versus the cESD group. Aspiration pneumonia was not observed, likely owing to preventive measures. RPM enabled safe and complete ESD for challenging lesions in the gastric fundus and greater curvature that were difficult to access with conventional left lateral decubitus ESD (Video S1). RPM offers a viable alternative for difficult gastric ESDs, improving accessibility and stability during the procedure.

Authors declare no conflict of interest for this article.

Approval of the research protocol by an Institutional Reviewer Board: This study was performed with the approval of the Saga Medical Centre Koseikan Ethics Committee (Approval number: 21-03-01-02).

Informed Consent: In this study, informed consent was obtained from patients using the opt-out method..

Registry and the Registration No. of the study/trial: N/A.

Animal Studies: N/A.

Abstract Image

右侧卧位推动法在内镜下黏膜下剥离上胃病变中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Endoscopy
Digestive Endoscopy 医学-外科
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
15.10%
发文量
291
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Digestive Endoscopy (DEN) is the official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy and the World Endoscopy Organization. Digestive Endoscopy serves as a medium for presenting original articles that offer significant contributions to knowledge in the broad field of endoscopy. The Journal also includes Reviews, Original Articles, How I Do It, Case Reports (only of exceptional interest and novelty are accepted), Letters, Techniques and Images, abstracts and news items that may be of interest to endoscopists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信