James Hose, Qi Zhang, Nathaniel P Sharp, Audrey P Gasch
{"title":"On the rate of aneuploidy reversion in a wild yeast model.","authors":"James Hose, Qi Zhang, Nathaniel P Sharp, Audrey P Gasch","doi":"10.1093/genetics/iyae196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aneuploidy, arising from gain or loss of chromosomes due to nondisjunction, is a special class of mutation. It can create significant phenotypic changes by altering abundance of hundreds of genes in a single event, providing material for adaptive evolution. But it can also incur large fitness costs relative to other types of mutations. Understanding mutational dynamics of aneuploidy is important for modeling its impact in nature, but aneuploidy rates are difficult to measure accurately. One challenge is that aneuploid karyotypes may revert back to euploidy, biasing forward mutation rate estimates - yet the rate of aneuploidy reversion is largely uncharacterized. Furthermore, current rate estimates are confounded because fitness differences between euploids and aneuploids are typically not accounted for in rate calculations. We developed a unique fluctuation assay in a wild-yeast model to measure the rate of extra-chromosome loss across three aneuploid chromosomes, while accounting for fitness differences between aneuploid and euploid cells. We show that incorporating fitness effects is essential to obtain accurate estimates of aneuploidy rates. Furthermore, the rate of extra-chromosome loss, separate from karyotype fitness differences, varies across chromosomes. We also measured rates in a strain lacking RNA-binding protein Ssd1, important for aneuploidy tolerance and implicated in chromosome segregation. We found no role for Ssd1 in the loss of native aneuploid chromosomes, although it did impact an engineered chromosome XV with a perturbed centromeric sequence. We discuss the impacts and challenges of modeling aneuploidy dynamics in real world situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48925,"journal":{"name":"Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyae196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aneuploidy, arising from gain or loss of chromosomes due to nondisjunction, is a special class of mutation. It can create significant phenotypic changes by altering abundance of hundreds of genes in a single event, providing material for adaptive evolution. But it can also incur large fitness costs relative to other types of mutations. Understanding mutational dynamics of aneuploidy is important for modeling its impact in nature, but aneuploidy rates are difficult to measure accurately. One challenge is that aneuploid karyotypes may revert back to euploidy, biasing forward mutation rate estimates - yet the rate of aneuploidy reversion is largely uncharacterized. Furthermore, current rate estimates are confounded because fitness differences between euploids and aneuploids are typically not accounted for in rate calculations. We developed a unique fluctuation assay in a wild-yeast model to measure the rate of extra-chromosome loss across three aneuploid chromosomes, while accounting for fitness differences between aneuploid and euploid cells. We show that incorporating fitness effects is essential to obtain accurate estimates of aneuploidy rates. Furthermore, the rate of extra-chromosome loss, separate from karyotype fitness differences, varies across chromosomes. We also measured rates in a strain lacking RNA-binding protein Ssd1, important for aneuploidy tolerance and implicated in chromosome segregation. We found no role for Ssd1 in the loss of native aneuploid chromosomes, although it did impact an engineered chromosome XV with a perturbed centromeric sequence. We discuss the impacts and challenges of modeling aneuploidy dynamics in real world situations.
期刊介绍:
GENETICS is published by the Genetics Society of America, a scholarly society that seeks to deepen our understanding of the living world by advancing our understanding of genetics. Since 1916, GENETICS has published high-quality, original research presenting novel findings bearing on genetics and genomics. The journal publishes empirical studies of organisms ranging from microbes to humans, as well as theoretical work.
While it has an illustrious history, GENETICS has changed along with the communities it serves: it is not your mentor''s journal.
The editors make decisions quickly – in around 30 days – without sacrificing the excellence and scholarship for which the journal has long been known. GENETICS is a peer reviewed, peer-edited journal, with an international reach and increasing visibility and impact. All editorial decisions are made through collaboration of at least two editors who are practicing scientists.
GENETICS is constantly innovating: expanded types of content include Reviews, Commentary (current issues of interest to geneticists), Perspectives (historical), Primers (to introduce primary literature into the classroom), Toolbox Reviews, plus YeastBook, FlyBook, and WormBook (coming spring 2016). For particularly time-sensitive results, we publish Communications. As part of our mission to serve our communities, we''ve published thematic collections, including Genomic Selection, Multiparental Populations, Mouse Collaborative Cross, and the Genetics of Sex.