Low-Dose Prophylactic Oral Iron Supplementation (Ferrous Fumarate, Ferrous Bisglycinate, and Ferrous Sulphate) in Pregnancy Is Not Associated With Clinically Significant Gastrointestinal Complaints: Results From Two Randomized Studies.

IF 3.2 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Pregnancy Pub Date : 2024-11-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/1716798
Nils Thorm Milman, Thomas Bergholt
{"title":"Low-Dose Prophylactic Oral Iron Supplementation (Ferrous Fumarate, Ferrous Bisglycinate, and Ferrous Sulphate) in Pregnancy Is Not Associated With Clinically Significant Gastrointestinal Complaints: Results From Two Randomized Studies.","authors":"Nils Thorm Milman, Thomas Bergholt","doi":"10.1155/2024/1716798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Many pregnant women are reluctant to follow the recommendation concerning oral iron prophylaxis due to concerns about gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. <b>Objective:</b> To assess the frequency of GI complaints during low-dose oral iron prophylaxis and compare three iron formulas in equipotent doses: ferrous fumarate versus ferrous bisglycinate versus ferrous sulphate, in healthy women with an uncomplicated single pregnancy. <b>Methods:</b> Results from two randomized, double-blind studies are reported: the Gentofte study comprising 404 women allocated into four groups taking 20, 40, 60, and 80 mg of elemental iron as ferrous fumarate/day and the Naestved study comprising 78 women allocated into two groups: 25 mg of elemental iron as ferrous bisglycinate/day and 50 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate/day between meals from 15 to 19 weeks of gestation to delivery. GI complaints (nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain/pyrosis, belching, meteorism, borborygmi, intestinal colic, flatulence, loose stools, constipation, and use of laxatives), as well as black stools, were recorded by interview at the time of inclusion and at regular intervals during gestation. <b>Results:</b> At inclusion, the frequency of total combined GI complaints in all women (<i>n</i> = 482) was 21%. The Gentofte study showed that in the groups taking 20-60 mg iron/day as fumarate, there was no association between the iron dose and the frequency of GI side effects. An iron dose of 80 mg as fumarate was associated with significantly higher frequencies of constipation and the use of laxatives. Comparing the three equipotent doses of iron formulas, which can prevent iron deficiency, ferrous bisglycinate 25 mg iron had the most favourable GI side effect profile, while ferrous fumarate 40 mg iron and ferrous sulphate 50 mg iron had higher but similar GI side effect profiles. The frequency of black stools increased with the iron dose. Ferrous bisglycinate 25 mg iron had a lower frequency of black stools (8%) than ferrous fumarate 40 mg iron (22%) and ferrous sulphate 50 mg iron (31%). <b>Conclusion:</b> Low-dose iron supplementation appears to have no clinically significant GI side effects, as none of the included women presented with GI complaints of such severity that it necessitated either reduction of iron dose, change to an alternative iron formula, or discontinuation of iron supplement. However, ferrous bisglycinate 25 mg iron/day is associated with significantly fewer GI complaints than ferrous fumarate 40 mg iron/day and ferrous sulphate 50 mg iron/day. Ferrous bisglycinate may be preferred for iron prophylaxis, especially in women experiencing GI side effects when taking other conventional iron formulas.</p>","PeriodicalId":47062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pregnancy","volume":"2024 ","pages":"1716798"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1716798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many pregnant women are reluctant to follow the recommendation concerning oral iron prophylaxis due to concerns about gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. Objective: To assess the frequency of GI complaints during low-dose oral iron prophylaxis and compare three iron formulas in equipotent doses: ferrous fumarate versus ferrous bisglycinate versus ferrous sulphate, in healthy women with an uncomplicated single pregnancy. Methods: Results from two randomized, double-blind studies are reported: the Gentofte study comprising 404 women allocated into four groups taking 20, 40, 60, and 80 mg of elemental iron as ferrous fumarate/day and the Naestved study comprising 78 women allocated into two groups: 25 mg of elemental iron as ferrous bisglycinate/day and 50 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate/day between meals from 15 to 19 weeks of gestation to delivery. GI complaints (nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain/pyrosis, belching, meteorism, borborygmi, intestinal colic, flatulence, loose stools, constipation, and use of laxatives), as well as black stools, were recorded by interview at the time of inclusion and at regular intervals during gestation. Results: At inclusion, the frequency of total combined GI complaints in all women (n = 482) was 21%. The Gentofte study showed that in the groups taking 20-60 mg iron/day as fumarate, there was no association between the iron dose and the frequency of GI side effects. An iron dose of 80 mg as fumarate was associated with significantly higher frequencies of constipation and the use of laxatives. Comparing the three equipotent doses of iron formulas, which can prevent iron deficiency, ferrous bisglycinate 25 mg iron had the most favourable GI side effect profile, while ferrous fumarate 40 mg iron and ferrous sulphate 50 mg iron had higher but similar GI side effect profiles. The frequency of black stools increased with the iron dose. Ferrous bisglycinate 25 mg iron had a lower frequency of black stools (8%) than ferrous fumarate 40 mg iron (22%) and ferrous sulphate 50 mg iron (31%). Conclusion: Low-dose iron supplementation appears to have no clinically significant GI side effects, as none of the included women presented with GI complaints of such severity that it necessitated either reduction of iron dose, change to an alternative iron formula, or discontinuation of iron supplement. However, ferrous bisglycinate 25 mg iron/day is associated with significantly fewer GI complaints than ferrous fumarate 40 mg iron/day and ferrous sulphate 50 mg iron/day. Ferrous bisglycinate may be preferred for iron prophylaxis, especially in women experiencing GI side effects when taking other conventional iron formulas.

妊娠期小剂量预防性口服铁补充剂(富马酸亚铁、甘氨酸亚铁和硫酸亚铁)与临床上明显的胃肠道不适无关:两项随机研究的结果。
背景:由于担心胃肠道(GI)副作用,许多孕妇不愿意听从有关口服铁剂预防的建议。目的在无并发症的单胎妊娠健康妇女中,评估低剂量口服铁剂预防期间出现胃肠道不适的频率,并比较三种同等剂量的铁剂配方:富马酸亚铁、甘氨酸亚铁和硫酸亚铁。方法:报告了两项随机双盲研究的结果:Gentofte 研究由 404 名妇女组成,分为四组,每天服用 20、40、60 和 80 毫克元素铁(富马酸亚铁);Naestved 研究由 78 名妇女组成,分为两组:每天服用 25 毫克元素铁(双甘氨酸亚铁)和每天服用 50 毫克元素铁(硫酸亚铁),从妊娠 15 到 19 周直至分娩。在入组时和妊娠期间定期进行访谈,记录消化道主诉(恶心、呕吐、上腹痛/胃痉挛、嗳气、陨石症、肠绞痛、胀气、大便稀、便秘和使用泻药)以及黑便情况。结果所有妇女(n = 482)在纳入研究时,合并消化道症状的总频率为 21%。Gentofte 研究显示,在每天服用 20-60 毫克富马酸铁的组别中,铁剂量与胃肠道副作用的发生频率之间没有关联。铁剂量为 80 毫克富马酸盐时,便秘和使用泻药的频率明显较高。比较可预防缺铁的三种等剂量铁剂,25 毫克富马酸亚铁的胃肠道副作用最大,而 40 毫克富马酸亚铁和 50 毫克硫酸亚铁的胃肠道副作用较高但相似。黑便的频率随铁剂量的增加而增加。与富马酸亚铁 40 毫克铁剂(22%)和硫酸亚铁 50 毫克铁剂(31%)相比,25 毫克富马酸亚铁的黑便频率(8%)较低。结论:小剂量铁质补充剂似乎没有明显的胃肠道副作用,因为所纳入的妇女中没有人出现严重的胃肠道不适,以致需要减少铁质剂量、改用其他铁质配方或停止铁质补充剂。不过,与富马酸亚铁 40 毫克铁/天和硫酸亚铁 50 毫克铁/天相比,25 毫克铁/天的甘氨酸亚铁引起的胃肠道不适明显较少。在预防性服用铁剂时,特别是在服用其他常规铁剂时出现胃肠道副作用的妇女中,可首选双甘氨酸亚铁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pregnancy
Journal of Pregnancy OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pregnancy is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on breastfeeding, labor, maternal health and the biomedical aspects of pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信