Physician-led YouTube videos related to anterior cruciate ligament injuries provide higher quality educational content compared to other sources.

IF 2.7 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Elliott W Cole, Katherine E Bach, Jeffrey J Theismann, Luke L Sang, Zaim Chaudhary, Nirav K Pandya, Brian T Feeley
{"title":"Physician-led YouTube videos related to anterior cruciate ligament injuries provide higher quality educational content compared to other sources.","authors":"Elliott W Cole, Katherine E Bach, Jeffrey J Theismann, Luke L Sang, Zaim Chaudhary, Nirav K Pandya, Brian T Feeley","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery are very common. Patients increasingly use social media platforms like YouTube to find healthcare information to help them make medical decisions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of YouTube videos providing information about ACL injuries and ACL surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The most-viewed YouTube videos for ACL-associated search terms were reviewed for inclusion and assessed by two authors using four video quality assessment tools: Journal of American Medical Association benchmark (JAMA) (0-4), Global Quality Score (GQS) (1-5), modified DISCERN (mod-DISCERN) (0-5), and YouTube ACL Specific Score (ASS) (0-25). Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to determine interrater reliability. Unpaired t-tests were used for comparisons between groups and linear regressions to identify associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 45 videos that met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 31.1% of videos reported an academic affiliation, and 53.3% listed an MD as the lead author. Mean JAMA score was 2.8, GQS 3.2, mod-DISCERN 2.6, and overall ASS 5.9. There was good interobserver agreement across all quality tools (ICC>0.75). Videos with an MD lead author had significantly higher JAMA (p<0.001) and GQS (p<0.01) scores than non-physicians. Videos with academic affiliations had significantly higher JAMA (p<0.001), GQS (p<0.01), mod-DISCERN (p<0.01), and ASS Management Domain (p=0.04) scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among the most-viewed YouTube videos related to ACL injuries and ACL surgery, physician-led and academically affiliated videos provided higher quality educational information compared to other sources, however, the overall quality of content provided is low.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"100367"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery are very common. Patients increasingly use social media platforms like YouTube to find healthcare information to help them make medical decisions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of YouTube videos providing information about ACL injuries and ACL surgery.

Methods: The most-viewed YouTube videos for ACL-associated search terms were reviewed for inclusion and assessed by two authors using four video quality assessment tools: Journal of American Medical Association benchmark (JAMA) (0-4), Global Quality Score (GQS) (1-5), modified DISCERN (mod-DISCERN) (0-5), and YouTube ACL Specific Score (ASS) (0-25). Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to determine interrater reliability. Unpaired t-tests were used for comparisons between groups and linear regressions to identify associations.

Results: There were 45 videos that met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 31.1% of videos reported an academic affiliation, and 53.3% listed an MD as the lead author. Mean JAMA score was 2.8, GQS 3.2, mod-DISCERN 2.6, and overall ASS 5.9. There was good interobserver agreement across all quality tools (ICC>0.75). Videos with an MD lead author had significantly higher JAMA (p<0.001) and GQS (p<0.01) scores than non-physicians. Videos with academic affiliations had significantly higher JAMA (p<0.001), GQS (p<0.01), mod-DISCERN (p<0.01), and ASS Management Domain (p=0.04) scores.

Conclusion: Among the most-viewed YouTube videos related to ACL injuries and ACL surgery, physician-led and academically affiliated videos provided higher quality educational information compared to other sources, however, the overall quality of content provided is low.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

与其他资源相比,由医生主导的与前交叉韧带损伤相关的 YouTube 视频提供了更高质量的教育内容。
导言:前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤和 ACL 重建(ACLR)手术非常常见。患者越来越多地使用 YouTube 等社交媒体平台来查找医疗保健信息,以帮助他们做出医疗决定。本研究旨在评估 YouTube 视频的质量,这些视频提供了有关前交叉韧带损伤和前交叉韧带手术的信息:两位作者使用四种视频质量评估工具对YouTube上浏览量最高的前交叉韧带相关搜索词视频进行了审查和评估:美国医学会杂志基准 (JAMA) (0-4)、全球质量评分 (GQS) (1-5)、修正 DISCERN (mod-DISCERN) (0-5) 和 YouTube ACL 特定评分 (ASS) (0-25)。计算类内相关系数 (ICC) 以确定研究者之间的可靠性。使用非配对 t 检验进行组间比较,使用线性回归确定相关性:共有 45 部视频符合纳入标准。总体而言,31.1%的视频报告了学术隶属关系,53.3%的视频将医学博士列为第一作者。平均 JAMA 得分 2.8,GQS 得分 3.2,mod-DISCERN 得分 2.6,总体 ASS 得分 5.9。所有质量工具的观察者间一致性良好(ICC>0.75)。由医学博士作为第一作者的视频在《美国医学会杂志》上的点击率明显更高(p 结论:在YouTube上浏览量最高的前交叉韧带损伤和前交叉韧带手术相关视频中,与其他来源相比,医生主导的视频和学术附属视频提供的教育信息质量较高,但所提供内容的总体质量较低:证据等级:IV 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信