All-Suture Anchor Onlay Fixation for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Comparison of Fixation Constructs.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241294011
Benjamin L Smith, Asheesh Bedi, Oliver L Hauck, Coen A Wijdicks, Jonathan C Riboh
{"title":"All-Suture Anchor Onlay Fixation for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Comparison of Fixation Constructs.","authors":"Benjamin L Smith, Asheesh Bedi, Oliver L Hauck, Coen A Wijdicks, Jonathan C Riboh","doi":"10.1177/23259671241294011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of all-suture anchors (ASAs) for onlay patellar and femoral fixation of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) grafts may provide clinical benefit, particularly in the small or pediatric knee; however, biomechanical data supporting the use of ASAs are lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose/hypothesis: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare ASAs to larger interference implants for MPFL reconstruction in a time-zero biomechanical model. It was hypothesized that ASAs would have comparable cyclic elongation to interference fixation and would exceed published biomechanical values for the native human MPFL.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Controlled laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen fresh-frozen porcine patellas and femurs were divided into equal groups (n = 9 per group) for MPFL reconstructions. Patellar fixation utilized two 3.9-mm interference suture anchors (ISAs) or two 2.6-mm ASAs, while femoral fixation utilized one 6×20-mm interference screw (IS) or one 2.6-mm ASA. Human gracilis tendon grafts were used. Specimens were dynamically loaded for 100 cycles each in sequential 5- to 30-N (phase 1) and 5- to 50-N (phase 2) blocks at 1 Hz followed by load-to-failure testing at 305 mm/min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences were found in cyclic elongation after phase 1 and phase 2 loading between ASA and interference implants on either the femoral or patellar side. On the femur, IS had significantly greater ultimate stiffness (54.2 vs 46.1 N/mm; <i>P</i> < .001) and ultimate load (366 vs 278 N; <i>P</i> = .019) compared to ASA. On the patella, ISAs had significantly greater ultimate stiffness (70.5 vs 53.1 N/mm; <i>P</i> < .001) but a significantly lower ultimate load (244 vs 307 N; <i>P</i> = .014) compared to ASAs. All groups significantly exceeded the published physiological values for native human MPFL stiffness and failure load.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASA onlay fixation had comparable cyclic elongation to that of interference fixation for femoral and patellar MPFL reconstruction. Although differences in ultimate stiffness and ultimate load were noted between implants, all of the values exceeded published values for the human MPFL.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This biomechanical study presents ASA cortical onlay fixation as a viable option for MPFL reconstruction. ASAs require less bone removal, potentially reducing the risk of patellar fracture and minimizing fixation complexity in the setting of open femoral growth plates. Future clinical studies will provide insight into successful tendon-to-bone healing, failure rates, and near- and long-term patient-reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"12 11","pages":"23259671241294011"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241294011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of all-suture anchors (ASAs) for onlay patellar and femoral fixation of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) grafts may provide clinical benefit, particularly in the small or pediatric knee; however, biomechanical data supporting the use of ASAs are lacking.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare ASAs to larger interference implants for MPFL reconstruction in a time-zero biomechanical model. It was hypothesized that ASAs would have comparable cyclic elongation to interference fixation and would exceed published biomechanical values for the native human MPFL.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Eighteen fresh-frozen porcine patellas and femurs were divided into equal groups (n = 9 per group) for MPFL reconstructions. Patellar fixation utilized two 3.9-mm interference suture anchors (ISAs) or two 2.6-mm ASAs, while femoral fixation utilized one 6×20-mm interference screw (IS) or one 2.6-mm ASA. Human gracilis tendon grafts were used. Specimens were dynamically loaded for 100 cycles each in sequential 5- to 30-N (phase 1) and 5- to 50-N (phase 2) blocks at 1 Hz followed by load-to-failure testing at 305 mm/min.

Results: No differences were found in cyclic elongation after phase 1 and phase 2 loading between ASA and interference implants on either the femoral or patellar side. On the femur, IS had significantly greater ultimate stiffness (54.2 vs 46.1 N/mm; P < .001) and ultimate load (366 vs 278 N; P = .019) compared to ASA. On the patella, ISAs had significantly greater ultimate stiffness (70.5 vs 53.1 N/mm; P < .001) but a significantly lower ultimate load (244 vs 307 N; P = .014) compared to ASAs. All groups significantly exceeded the published physiological values for native human MPFL stiffness and failure load.

Conclusion: ASA onlay fixation had comparable cyclic elongation to that of interference fixation for femoral and patellar MPFL reconstruction. Although differences in ultimate stiffness and ultimate load were noted between implants, all of the values exceeded published values for the human MPFL.

Clinical relevance: This biomechanical study presents ASA cortical onlay fixation as a viable option for MPFL reconstruction. ASAs require less bone removal, potentially reducing the risk of patellar fracture and minimizing fixation complexity in the setting of open femoral growth plates. Future clinical studies will provide insight into successful tendon-to-bone healing, failure rates, and near- and long-term patient-reported outcomes.

用于髌股内侧韧带重建的全缝合锚嵌体固定:固定结构的生物力学比较。
背景:使用全缝合锚(ASA)对髌股内侧韧带(MPFL)移植物进行髌骨和股骨嵌合固定可能会带来临床益处,尤其是在小膝关节或儿童膝关节中;然而,目前还缺乏支持使用ASA的生物力学数据:本研究的目的是在零时生物力学模型中比较 ASA 与较大的干扰植入物在 MPFL 重建中的应用。假设 ASA 的循环伸长率与干扰固定相当,并将超过已公布的原生人类 MPFL 生物力学值:研究设计:实验室对照研究:方法:将 18 个新鲜冷冻的猪髌骨和股骨分成相同的组(每组 9 个),用于 MPFL 重建。髌骨固定采用两个 3.9 毫米干扰缝合锚(ISA)或两个 2.6 毫米 ASA,股骨固定采用一个 6×20 毫米干扰螺钉(IS)或一个 2.6 毫米 ASA。使用的是人类腓肠肌肌腱移植物。以 1 Hz 的频率在 5 至 30 N(第 1 阶段)和 5 至 50 N(第 2 阶段)的序列块中对每个试样进行 100 个循环的动态加载,然后以 305 mm/min 的速度进行加载至破坏测试:在股骨侧或髌骨侧,ASA植入体和干扰植入体在第一阶段和第二阶段加载后的循环伸长率没有差异。在股骨上,与 ASA 相比,ISA 的极限硬度(54.2 vs 46.1 N/mm;P < .001)和极限载荷(366 vs 278 N;P = .019)明显更高。在髌骨上,与 ASA 相比,ISA 的极限硬度明显更高(70.5 vs 53.1 N/mm;P < .001),但极限负荷明显更低(244 vs 307 N;P = .014)。所有组别都明显超过了已公布的人体原生 MPFL 硬度和破坏载荷的生理值:结论:在股骨和髌骨 MPFL 重建中,ASA 嵌体固定与干扰固定的循环伸长率相当。尽管不同植入物的极限刚度和极限载荷存在差异,但所有数值都超过了已公布的人类 MPFL 数值:这项生物力学研究表明 ASA 皮质嵌体固定是 MPFL 重建的可行选择。ASA 所需的骨量较少,可能会降低髌骨骨折的风险,并最大限度地降低开放式股骨生长板固定的复杂性。未来的临床研究将深入探讨肌腱与骨的成功愈合、失败率以及近期和远期患者报告结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信