Opportunities to enhance retention on medication for opioid use disorder for adolescents and young adults: results from a qualitative study with medical providers in Philadelphia, PA.

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Maria Christina Herrera, Kaja Darien, Sarah Wood, Scott E Hadland, J Deanna Wilson, Nadia Dowshen
{"title":"Opportunities to enhance retention on medication for opioid use disorder for adolescents and young adults: results from a qualitative study with medical providers in Philadelphia, PA.","authors":"Maria Christina Herrera, Kaja Darien, Sarah Wood, Scott E Hadland, J Deanna Wilson, Nadia Dowshen","doi":"10.1186/s12954-024-01113-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are under-prescribed to adolescents and young adults (AYA). Few published studies have explored challenges to and opportunities to enhance continuous provision of MOUD for AYA. Our report focuses on this emergent theme that was identified as part of a larger qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We purposively sampled and enrolled medical providers who prescribed MOUD to AYA. Semi-structured individual interviews using chart-stimulated recall explored barriers and facilitators to MOUD retention. We used modified grounded theory in our qualitative analysis, with double coding of interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers to retention on MOUD included patient-level (i.e., return to substance use) and system-level factors (i.e., cost, delayed receipt, pharmacy challenges, and in-person visit requirements). Facilitators included patient-level (i.e., motivation, support networks) and system-level factors (i.e., telehealth access, availability of certified recovery specialists).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study is the first to look at retention for this key age group, setting it apart from the existing body of literature that looks at medication initiation. Our findings confirm that significant systemic barriers exist to AYA patients' retention on MOUD. Further research is needed to develop interventions that facilitate continuous delivery of high-quality care among this key population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"210"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01113-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are under-prescribed to adolescents and young adults (AYA). Few published studies have explored challenges to and opportunities to enhance continuous provision of MOUD for AYA. Our report focuses on this emergent theme that was identified as part of a larger qualitative study.

Methods: We purposively sampled and enrolled medical providers who prescribed MOUD to AYA. Semi-structured individual interviews using chart-stimulated recall explored barriers and facilitators to MOUD retention. We used modified grounded theory in our qualitative analysis, with double coding of interviews.

Results: Barriers to retention on MOUD included patient-level (i.e., return to substance use) and system-level factors (i.e., cost, delayed receipt, pharmacy challenges, and in-person visit requirements). Facilitators included patient-level (i.e., motivation, support networks) and system-level factors (i.e., telehealth access, availability of certified recovery specialists).

Conclusions: Our study is the first to look at retention for this key age group, setting it apart from the existing body of literature that looks at medication initiation. Our findings confirm that significant systemic barriers exist to AYA patients' retention on MOUD. Further research is needed to develop interventions that facilitate continuous delivery of high-quality care among this key population.

加强青少年阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的机会:宾夕法尼亚州费城医疗服务提供者定性研究的结果。
背景:青少年和年轻成年人(AYA)阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)药物处方不足。很少有公开发表的研究探讨了为青少年持续提供阿片类药物所面临的挑战和机遇。我们的报告重点讨论了这一新出现的主题,该主题是一项大型定性研究的一部分:方法:我们有目的性地抽取并招募了为青少年开具 MOUD 的医疗服务提供者。采用图表刺激回忆法进行的半结构化个人访谈探讨了保留 MOUD 的障碍和促进因素。我们在定性分析中使用了修正的基础理论,并对访谈进行了双重编码:结果:保留 MOUD 的障碍包括患者层面的因素(即重新使用药物)和系统层面的因素(即成本、延迟接收、药房挑战和亲自访问要求)。促进因素包括患者层面的因素(即动机、支持网络)和系统层面的因素(即远程医疗接入、认证康复专家的可用性):我们的研究首次关注了这一关键年龄组的保留率,使其有别于关注药物初始治疗的现有文献。我们的研究结果证实,青壮年患者在继续服用 MOUD 方面存在严重的系统性障碍。需要进一步开展研究,以制定干预措施,促进在这一关键人群中持续提供高质量的护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信