Maternal mortality following caesarean section in a low-resource setting: a National Malawian Surveillance Study.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jennifer Riches, Yamikani Chimwaza, Bertha Immaculate Magreta Chakhame, Jack Milln, Hussein H Twabi, Rosemary Bilesi, Luis Gadama, Fannie Kachale, Annie Kuyere, Lumbani Makhaza, Regina Makuluni, Laura Munthali, Owen Musopole, Chifundo Ndamala, Deborah A Phiri, Louise Afran, Amie Wilson, Shakila Thangaratinam, Abi Merriel, Catriona Waitt, Maria Lisa Odland, James Jafali, David Lissauer
{"title":"Maternal mortality following caesarean section in a low-resource setting: a National Malawian Surveillance Study.","authors":"Jennifer Riches, Yamikani Chimwaza, Bertha Immaculate Magreta Chakhame, Jack Milln, Hussein H Twabi, Rosemary Bilesi, Luis Gadama, Fannie Kachale, Annie Kuyere, Lumbani Makhaza, Regina Makuluni, Laura Munthali, Owen Musopole, Chifundo Ndamala, Deborah A Phiri, Louise Afran, Amie Wilson, Shakila Thangaratinam, Abi Merriel, Catriona Waitt, Maria Lisa Odland, James Jafali, David Lissauer","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Caesarean section (CS) is the most common major surgery conducted globally, with rates rising. CS also contributes to maternal morbidity and mortality, with increased risks in low-resource settings. We conducted a detailed review of maternal deaths from 2020 to 2022 in Malawi to determine the burden of deaths related to CS, avoidable health system factors, and causes of death associated with this procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected regarding every maternal death occurring across all district and central hospitals in Malawi, alongside facility-level aggregated birth data. Maternal deaths were reviewed by facility-based multidisciplinary teams with subsequent confirmation of cause of death by obstetricians according to international criteria. Logistic regression was applied to estimate the odds of associations of leading causes of death with CS while adjusting for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite a low national CS rate, most deaths occurred following CS (51.8%, 276/533). Women who delivered by CS were five times (OR 5.60, 95% CI 4.74 to 6.67) more likely to die than women who delivered vaginally. The leading causes of death following CS were postpartum haemorrhage (26.0%, 68/277), eclampsia (15.6%, 41/277) and infection (14.1%, 37/277). Deaths from pregnancy-related infection were more often associated with CS (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.72). Health system factors more frequently associated with deaths following CS than vaginal birth included 'prolonged abnormal observations without action' (p=0.006), 'delay in starting treatment' (p=0.006) and 'lack of blood transfusion' (p=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a high burden of maternal death following CS in this low-resource setting. Until now, international attention and many clinical trials have been focused on improving the safety of vaginal birth. Our findings highlight the need to ensure the safe and appropriate use of this potentially life-saving intervention to reduce maternal deaths. To avoid the high burden of death following CS we highlight, there is urgent need to develop and trial CS-specific interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016999","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Caesarean section (CS) is the most common major surgery conducted globally, with rates rising. CS also contributes to maternal morbidity and mortality, with increased risks in low-resource settings. We conducted a detailed review of maternal deaths from 2020 to 2022 in Malawi to determine the burden of deaths related to CS, avoidable health system factors, and causes of death associated with this procedure.

Methods: Data were collected regarding every maternal death occurring across all district and central hospitals in Malawi, alongside facility-level aggregated birth data. Maternal deaths were reviewed by facility-based multidisciplinary teams with subsequent confirmation of cause of death by obstetricians according to international criteria. Logistic regression was applied to estimate the odds of associations of leading causes of death with CS while adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: Despite a low national CS rate, most deaths occurred following CS (51.8%, 276/533). Women who delivered by CS were five times (OR 5.60, 95% CI 4.74 to 6.67) more likely to die than women who delivered vaginally. The leading causes of death following CS were postpartum haemorrhage (26.0%, 68/277), eclampsia (15.6%, 41/277) and infection (14.1%, 37/277). Deaths from pregnancy-related infection were more often associated with CS (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.72). Health system factors more frequently associated with deaths following CS than vaginal birth included 'prolonged abnormal observations without action' (p=0.006), 'delay in starting treatment' (p=0.006) and 'lack of blood transfusion' (p=0.03).

Conclusions: We found a high burden of maternal death following CS in this low-resource setting. Until now, international attention and many clinical trials have been focused on improving the safety of vaginal birth. Our findings highlight the need to ensure the safe and appropriate use of this potentially life-saving intervention to reduce maternal deaths. To avoid the high burden of death following CS we highlight, there is urgent need to develop and trial CS-specific interventions.

低资源环境下剖腹产后的产妇死亡率:马拉维全国监测研究。
背景:剖腹产(CS)是全球最常见的大手术,且比例不断上升。剖腹产也是导致孕产妇发病率和死亡率的原因之一,在资源匮乏的环境中风险更高。我们详细回顾了马拉维 2020 年至 2022 年的孕产妇死亡情况,以确定与剖腹产相关的死亡负担、可避免的卫生系统因素以及与该手术相关的死亡原因:收集了马拉维所有地区医院和中心医院每例孕产妇死亡的数据,以及医疗机构层面的出生汇总数据。产妇死亡病例由医疗机构的多学科团队进行审查,随后由产科医生根据国际标准确认死因。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整的同时,采用逻辑回归法估算主要死因与 CS 的相关几率:尽管全国的剖腹产率较低,但大多数死亡发生在剖腹产后(51.8%,276/533)。与经阴道分娩的妇女相比,经阴道分娩的妇女死亡的可能性要高出五倍(OR 5.60,95% CI 4.74 至 6.67)。剖腹产后的主要死因是产后出血(26.0%,68/277)、子痫(15.6%,41/277)和感染(14.1%,37/277)。与妊娠相关的感染导致的死亡更多与分娩有关(OR 2.03,95% CI 1.12 至 3.72)。与阴道分娩相比,卫生系统因素更常与剖腹产后死亡相关,包括 "长时间异常观察而不采取措施"(P=0.006)、"延迟开始治疗"(P=0.006)和 "缺乏输血"(P=0.03):我们发现,在这种资源匮乏的环境中,产妇在分娩后死亡的几率很高。到目前为止,国际社会的注意力和许多临床试验都集中在提高阴道分娩的安全性上。我们的研究结果突出表明,有必要确保安全、适当地使用这一可能挽救生命的干预措施,以减少孕产妇死亡。为了避免我们强调的阴道分娩后的高死亡负担,迫切需要开发和试验针对阴道分娩的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信