{"title":"Evaluation Method for Bearing Capacity of Fine-Grained Soil Subgrade Based on Multiple Moduli","authors":"Danfeng Li, Weichao Liu, Guangming Zhang","doi":"10.1155/stc/7735960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>The bearing capacity of the existing fine-grained soil subgrade is mainly achieved by measuring the modulus, and its testing methods can be divided into two categories including static method and dynamic method. The data connection between the two is still lacking in systematic research. The traditional BB (Benkelman Beam) static test has disadvantages such as slow detection speed, low accuracy, and poor reliability due to the use of deflection index, which is not fully applicable to the expressway. To this end, dynamic and static comparison tests were carried out and a rapid test method for subgrade bearing capacity based on Soil Stiffness Gauge (SSG) and Portable Falling Weight Deflectometer (PFWD) with dynamic modulus was proposed. To establish the connectivity of the static and dynamic modulus, modulus-dependent prediction model was developed. The results show that the multiplier power model with modulus (<span></span><math></math><span></span><math></math>) is superior to the usual linear model (<i>E</i><sub>BB</sub> = 0.9415<i>E</i><sub>PFWD</sub> − 6.1507, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.9639; <i>E</i><sub>BB</sub> = 0.7878<i>E</i><sub>SSG</sub> − 0.4566, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.8894), and it can replace the traditional BB method. PFWD and SSG were found to be reliable devices with faster and more accurate monitoring of the modulus change of the fine-grained soil subgrade. But they have the property of overestimating material modulus, the modulus ranking of the three instruments is obtained. In this way, it provides a reference for the dynamic and accurate determination and scientific evaluation of the bearing capacity of the highway subgrade.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49471,"journal":{"name":"Structural Control & Health Monitoring","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/stc/7735960","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Control & Health Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/stc/7735960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The bearing capacity of the existing fine-grained soil subgrade is mainly achieved by measuring the modulus, and its testing methods can be divided into two categories including static method and dynamic method. The data connection between the two is still lacking in systematic research. The traditional BB (Benkelman Beam) static test has disadvantages such as slow detection speed, low accuracy, and poor reliability due to the use of deflection index, which is not fully applicable to the expressway. To this end, dynamic and static comparison tests were carried out and a rapid test method for subgrade bearing capacity based on Soil Stiffness Gauge (SSG) and Portable Falling Weight Deflectometer (PFWD) with dynamic modulus was proposed. To establish the connectivity of the static and dynamic modulus, modulus-dependent prediction model was developed. The results show that the multiplier power model with modulus () is superior to the usual linear model (EBB = 0.9415EPFWD − 6.1507, R2 = 0.9639; EBB = 0.7878ESSG − 0.4566, R2 = 0.8894), and it can replace the traditional BB method. PFWD and SSG were found to be reliable devices with faster and more accurate monitoring of the modulus change of the fine-grained soil subgrade. But they have the property of overestimating material modulus, the modulus ranking of the three instruments is obtained. In this way, it provides a reference for the dynamic and accurate determination and scientific evaluation of the bearing capacity of the highway subgrade.
期刊介绍:
The Journal Structural Control and Health Monitoring encompasses all theoretical and technological aspects of structural control, structural health monitoring theory and smart materials and structures. The journal focuses on aerospace, civil, infrastructure and mechanical engineering applications.
Original contributions based on analytical, computational and experimental methods are solicited in three main areas: monitoring, control, and smart materials and structures, covering subjects such as system identification, health monitoring, health diagnostics, multi-functional materials, signal processing, sensor technology, passive, active and semi active control schemes and implementations, shape memory alloys, piezoelectrics and mechatronics.
Also of interest are actuator design, dynamic systems, dynamic stability, artificial intelligence tools, data acquisition, wireless communications, measurements, MEMS/NEMS sensors for local damage detection, optical fibre sensors for health monitoring, remote control of monitoring systems, sensor-logger combinations for mobile applications, corrosion sensors, scour indicators and experimental techniques.