Application of machine learning-based phenotyping in individualized fluid management in critically ill patients with heart failure

Chengjian Guan, Bing Xiao
{"title":"Application of machine learning-based phenotyping in individualized fluid management in critically ill patients with heart failure","authors":"Chengjian Guan,&nbsp;Bing Xiao","doi":"10.1002/ctd2.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Heart failure (HF) is a major public health challenge, with fluid management being one of the most critical aspects of treatment. Fluid management is particularly a complex and challenging issue in critically ill patients, especially when cardiac pump function fails to meet the body's needs.<span><sup>1-3</sup></span> Clinicians often face multiple challenges when formulating fluid management strategies, including significant individual variations, complex dynamic changes, and diverse monitoring indicators. Most current intervention studies targeting fixed fluid management in HF patients have reported negative outcomes,<span><sup>4, 5</sup></span> reflecting the heterogeneity of severe HF patients and highlighting the urgent need for precision medicine. Therefore, our study aims to identify distinct characteristics of critically ill HF patients through retrospective analyses and develop targeted treatment strategies based on the optimal fluid balance ranges identified by longitudinal infusion data for each patient phenotype (Figure 1).<span><sup>6</sup></span></p><p>The advancement of artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) technology offers innovative solutions to these challenges. Unsupervised ML has emerged as a powerful tool in medical research, capable of identifying patterns in complex, high-dimensional data without explicit labelling. The patient data were extracted from two intensive care unit databases, integrating both numerical and categorical variables to maintain comprehensive clinical characteristics. The K-Prototypes algorithm was selected for its ability to effectively combine the principles of K-Means and K-Modes principles, thereby enhancing clustering quality by considering the differential contributions of various variable types to the total distance between samples.<span><sup>7</sup></span> Furthermore, fluid management is a dynamic process, where daily interventions and test results can affect subsequent outcomes. To address this, we analyzed 7-day fluid balance records using the G-formula parameter.<span><sup>8</sup></span> a sophisticated statistical approach to eliminate confounding effects between time-varying exposures and outcomes, thus providing more reliable clinical guidance.</p><p>Our analysis identified four distinct phenotypes of HF patients, each exhibiting significant differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis. The optimal fluid balance ranges for each phenotype aligned closely with their distinct clinical features. Phenotype A, characterized by severe inflammation and aggressive interventions including high rates of vasoactive drug use and mechanical ventilation, showed optimal outcomes with a moderate fluid balance of between –1000 and 500 mL per day. This finding indicates that a positive fluid balance is associated with adverse effects on mechanical ventilation duration and mortality. Phenotype C, despite having milder clinical parameters but combined with advanced age and multiple comorbidities, demonstrated high mortality and required careful fluid restriction (–1500 to 500 mL daily), highlighting the significant impact of age and frailty on HF prognosis. Phenotype D, presenting with severe metabolic disorders including acidosis and renal insufficiency, required stricter fluid management ranging from –2000 to –500 mL per day.</p><p>To facilitate clinical application, we developed a streamlined classification approach using nine clinical indicators identified through feature screening: age, blood urea nitrogen, hematocrit, vasoactive drug use, renal disease, creatinine, diastolic blood pressure, mechanical ventilation status and anion gap. The XGBoost model demonstrated good predictive efficacy in both internal and external validation, with the area under the curve values ranging from 0.918 to 0.943 and from 0.802 to 0.907, respectively. A web-based typing tool was developed to facilitate rapid phenotype identification at the bedside, supporting prompt decision-making in fluid management.</p><p>The advancement in ML-based phenotyping and personalized fluid management strategies for HF has opened new avenues for research and development. While our current findings demonstrate promising results, further investigation and technological advancement are necessary in several key areas. First, prospective validation studies are essential and should include diverse patient populations and healthcare settings to ensure the broad applicability of findings. Second, the integration of novel biomarkers offers an opportunity to improve phenotype classification accuracy. Beyond conventional clinical parameters, novel molecular markers, genetic signatures and sophisticated imaging metrics can provide deeper insights into disease mechanisms and treatment responses. From a technological perspective, continuous refinement of predictive models remains paramount. The application of advanced ML architectures, including deep learning and ensemble methods, has the potential to improve prediction accuracy and model robustness.</p><p>In conclusion, our work provides a potential framework for the implementation of precision medicine in intensive care cardiology. By establishing population-level evidence, we provide a practical approach to personalized fluid management in critically ill HF patients. The combination of robust phenotypic identification and user-friendly web-based tools provides clinicians with the basis for implementing more targeted treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes.</p><p>Chengjian Guan wrote the original draft. Bing Xiao reviewed and edited the manuscript.</p><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p><p>The project was supported by the S&amp;T Program of Hebei No. 22377728D.</p><p>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":72605,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and translational discovery","volume":"4 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ctd2.70020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and translational discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ctd2.70020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a major public health challenge, with fluid management being one of the most critical aspects of treatment. Fluid management is particularly a complex and challenging issue in critically ill patients, especially when cardiac pump function fails to meet the body's needs.1-3 Clinicians often face multiple challenges when formulating fluid management strategies, including significant individual variations, complex dynamic changes, and diverse monitoring indicators. Most current intervention studies targeting fixed fluid management in HF patients have reported negative outcomes,4, 5 reflecting the heterogeneity of severe HF patients and highlighting the urgent need for precision medicine. Therefore, our study aims to identify distinct characteristics of critically ill HF patients through retrospective analyses and develop targeted treatment strategies based on the optimal fluid balance ranges identified by longitudinal infusion data for each patient phenotype (Figure 1).6

The advancement of artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) technology offers innovative solutions to these challenges. Unsupervised ML has emerged as a powerful tool in medical research, capable of identifying patterns in complex, high-dimensional data without explicit labelling. The patient data were extracted from two intensive care unit databases, integrating both numerical and categorical variables to maintain comprehensive clinical characteristics. The K-Prototypes algorithm was selected for its ability to effectively combine the principles of K-Means and K-Modes principles, thereby enhancing clustering quality by considering the differential contributions of various variable types to the total distance between samples.7 Furthermore, fluid management is a dynamic process, where daily interventions and test results can affect subsequent outcomes. To address this, we analyzed 7-day fluid balance records using the G-formula parameter.8 a sophisticated statistical approach to eliminate confounding effects between time-varying exposures and outcomes, thus providing more reliable clinical guidance.

Our analysis identified four distinct phenotypes of HF patients, each exhibiting significant differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis. The optimal fluid balance ranges for each phenotype aligned closely with their distinct clinical features. Phenotype A, characterized by severe inflammation and aggressive interventions including high rates of vasoactive drug use and mechanical ventilation, showed optimal outcomes with a moderate fluid balance of between –1000 and 500 mL per day. This finding indicates that a positive fluid balance is associated with adverse effects on mechanical ventilation duration and mortality. Phenotype C, despite having milder clinical parameters but combined with advanced age and multiple comorbidities, demonstrated high mortality and required careful fluid restriction (–1500 to 500 mL daily), highlighting the significant impact of age and frailty on HF prognosis. Phenotype D, presenting with severe metabolic disorders including acidosis and renal insufficiency, required stricter fluid management ranging from –2000 to –500 mL per day.

To facilitate clinical application, we developed a streamlined classification approach using nine clinical indicators identified through feature screening: age, blood urea nitrogen, hematocrit, vasoactive drug use, renal disease, creatinine, diastolic blood pressure, mechanical ventilation status and anion gap. The XGBoost model demonstrated good predictive efficacy in both internal and external validation, with the area under the curve values ranging from 0.918 to 0.943 and from 0.802 to 0.907, respectively. A web-based typing tool was developed to facilitate rapid phenotype identification at the bedside, supporting prompt decision-making in fluid management.

The advancement in ML-based phenotyping and personalized fluid management strategies for HF has opened new avenues for research and development. While our current findings demonstrate promising results, further investigation and technological advancement are necessary in several key areas. First, prospective validation studies are essential and should include diverse patient populations and healthcare settings to ensure the broad applicability of findings. Second, the integration of novel biomarkers offers an opportunity to improve phenotype classification accuracy. Beyond conventional clinical parameters, novel molecular markers, genetic signatures and sophisticated imaging metrics can provide deeper insights into disease mechanisms and treatment responses. From a technological perspective, continuous refinement of predictive models remains paramount. The application of advanced ML architectures, including deep learning and ensemble methods, has the potential to improve prediction accuracy and model robustness.

In conclusion, our work provides a potential framework for the implementation of precision medicine in intensive care cardiology. By establishing population-level evidence, we provide a practical approach to personalized fluid management in critically ill HF patients. The combination of robust phenotypic identification and user-friendly web-based tools provides clinicians with the basis for implementing more targeted treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Chengjian Guan wrote the original draft. Bing Xiao reviewed and edited the manuscript.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The project was supported by the S&T Program of Hebei No. 22377728D.

Not applicable.

Abstract Image

基于机器学习的表型分析在心力衰竭重症患者个体化输液管理中的应用
心力衰竭(HF)是一项重大的公共卫生挑战,而体液管理是治疗中最关键的环节之一。1-3 临床医生在制定液体管理策略时往往面临多重挑战,包括显著的个体差异、复杂的动态变化和多样的监测指标。目前大多数针对高血压患者固定液体管理的干预研究都报告了负面结果,4、5 反映了严重高血压患者的异质性,并突出了对精准医疗的迫切需求。因此,我们的研究旨在通过回顾性分析确定重症 HF 患者的不同特征,并根据纵向输液数据为每种患者表型确定的最佳液体平衡范围(图 1)制定有针对性的治疗策略6。6 人工智能和机器学习(ML)技术的发展为这些挑战提供了创新性的解决方案。无监督 ML 已成为医学研究的强大工具,它能够在没有明确标签的情况下识别复杂的高维数据中的模式。患者数据是从两个重症监护室数据库中提取的,整合了数字变量和分类变量,以保持全面的临床特征。之所以选择 K-Prototypes 算法,是因为该算法能够有效结合 K-Means 和 K-Modes 原理,从而通过考虑各种变量类型对样本间总距离的不同贡献来提高聚类质量。我们的分析确定了四种不同的高血压患者表型,每种表型在临床特征和预后方面都有显著差异。每种表型的最佳体液平衡范围与其不同的临床特征密切相关。表型 A 以严重炎症和积极干预(包括大量使用血管活性药物和机械通气)为特征,其最佳预后为每天-1000 至 500 毫升的中度体液平衡。这一发现表明,正的体液平衡与机械通气持续时间和死亡率的不利影响相关。表型 C 虽然临床指标较轻,但合并高龄和多种并发症,死亡率较高,需要严格限制液体摄入(每天-1500 至 500 毫升),这突出表明了年龄和体弱对高频预后的重要影响。为了便于临床应用,我们开发了一种简化的分类方法,使用通过特征筛选确定的九个临床指标:年龄、血尿素氮、血细胞比容、血管活性药物使用、肾脏疾病、肌酐、舒张压、机械通气状态和阴离子间隙。XGBoost 模型在内部和外部验证中均表现出良好的预测效果,曲线下面积值分别为 0.918 至 0.943 和 0.802 至 0.907。我们开发了一种基于网络的分型工具,以方便床旁快速识别表型,从而为液体管理的及时决策提供支持。虽然我们目前的研究结果显示出了良好的前景,但仍有必要在几个关键领域开展进一步的研究和技术进步。首先,前瞻性验证研究至关重要,应包括不同的患者群体和医疗环境,以确保研究结果的广泛适用性。其次,新型生物标记物的整合为提高表型分类的准确性提供了机会。除了传统的临床参数外,新型分子标记物、遗传特征和复杂的成像指标可以让人们更深入地了解疾病机制和治疗反应。从技术角度来看,不断完善预测模型仍然至关重要。应用先进的 ML 架构,包括深度学习和集合方法,有可能提高预测的准确性和模型的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信