Machine learning in knee injury sequelae detection: Unravelling the role of psychological factors and preventing long-term sequelae

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clément LIPPS LENE, Julien Frere, Thierry Weissland
{"title":"Machine learning in knee injury sequelae detection: Unravelling the role of psychological factors and preventing long-term sequelae","authors":"Clément LIPPS LENE,&nbsp;Julien Frere,&nbsp;Thierry Weissland","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the performance of three machine learning (ML) algorithms—decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB)—in identifying regular athletes who suffered a knee injury several months to years prior. In addition, the contribution of psychological variables in addition to biomechanical ones in the classification performance of the ML algorithms was assessed, to better identify factors to get back to competitive sport with the lowest possible risk of new knee injury.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cohort of 96 athletes, 36 with prior knee injuries, practicing an average of 5.7 ± 2.4 h per week, participated in a horizontal force-velocity test on a ballistic ergometer providing data of force, velocity and power from each lower limb. They also completed a psychological questionnaire, which included components from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Sport Anxiety Scale (SAS). The three ML algorithms were trained on a thousand different train-test sets. Also, Shapley values were calculated for each input variable of a data set to highlight its contribution to the prediction from an ML model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Over a thousand cross-validations, higher area under the curve (AUC) values were obtained when accounted for the psychological attributes (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Also, higher AUC values were obtained from MLP compared to XGB or DT (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). XGB exhibited higher AUC values than DT (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results suggested that psychological factors play a more important role in recognition than biomechanical factors, with KOOS and SAS scores ranking high in the list of influential factors. Additionally, the computing stability of MLP could be recommended for classification tasks in the context of knee injuries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level III.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70081","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluated the performance of three machine learning (ML) algorithms—decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB)—in identifying regular athletes who suffered a knee injury several months to years prior. In addition, the contribution of psychological variables in addition to biomechanical ones in the classification performance of the ML algorithms was assessed, to better identify factors to get back to competitive sport with the lowest possible risk of new knee injury.

Methods

A cohort of 96 athletes, 36 with prior knee injuries, practicing an average of 5.7 ± 2.4 h per week, participated in a horizontal force-velocity test on a ballistic ergometer providing data of force, velocity and power from each lower limb. They also completed a psychological questionnaire, which included components from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Sport Anxiety Scale (SAS). The three ML algorithms were trained on a thousand different train-test sets. Also, Shapley values were calculated for each input variable of a data set to highlight its contribution to the prediction from an ML model.

Results

Over a thousand cross-validations, higher area under the curve (AUC) values were obtained when accounted for the psychological attributes (p < 0.001). Also, higher AUC values were obtained from MLP compared to XGB or DT (p < 0.001). XGB exhibited higher AUC values than DT (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our results suggested that psychological factors play a more important role in recognition than biomechanical factors, with KOOS and SAS scores ranking high in the list of influential factors. Additionally, the computing stability of MLP could be recommended for classification tasks in the context of knee injuries.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Abstract Image

膝伤后遗症检测中的机器学习:揭示心理因素的作用并预防长期后遗症
目的 本研究评估了三种机器学习(ML)算法--决策树(DT)、多层感知器(MLP)和极梯度提升(XGB)--在识别数月至数年前受过膝伤的普通运动员方面的性能。此外,还评估了心理变量和生物力学变量对 ML 算法分类性能的贡献,以便更好地确定恢复竞技运动的因素,尽可能降低新的膝关节损伤风险。 方法 96 名运动员(36 人曾受过膝伤,平均每周练习 5.7±2.4 小时)参加了弹道测力计上的水平力-速度测试,该测试提供了每个下肢的力、速度和功率数据。他们还填写了一份心理问卷,其中包括膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)和运动焦虑量表(SAS)的部分内容。三种 ML 算法在一千个不同的训练-测试集上进行了训练。此外,还计算了数据集中每个输入变量的 Shapley 值,以突出其对 ML 模型预测的贡献。 结果 在一千次交叉验证中,当考虑到心理属性时,曲线下面积(AUC)值较高(p < 0.001)。此外,与 XGB 或 DT 相比,MLP 的 AUC 值更高(p < 0.001)。XGB 的 AUC 值高于 DT(p < 0.001)。 结论 我们的结果表明,与生物力学因素相比,心理因素在识别中起着更重要的作用,KOOS 和 SAS 分数在影响因素列表中名列前茅。此外,在膝关节损伤的分类任务中,MLP 的计算稳定性值得推荐。 证据等级 III 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信