How lean and industry 4.0 affect worker outcomes and operational performance: A quantitative assessment of competing models

IF 9.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Alejandro G. Frank , Timothy J. Sturgeon , Guilherme B. Benitez , Giuliano A. Marodin , Samantha Ferreira e Cunha
{"title":"How lean and industry 4.0 affect worker outcomes and operational performance: A quantitative assessment of competing models","authors":"Alejandro G. Frank ,&nbsp;Timothy J. Sturgeon ,&nbsp;Guilherme B. Benitez ,&nbsp;Giuliano A. Marodin ,&nbsp;Samantha Ferreira e Cunha","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the relationship between Lean Manufacturing and Industry 4.0, two paradigms that have shaped modern manufacturing. While Lean Manufacturing seeks to optimize sociotechnical systems by integrating workers, processes, and technologies, the focus of Industry 4.0 is to integrate digital technologies into manufacturing processes. Related literature has considered a diversity of relationships between Lean and Industry 4.0 but used contradictory models to explain their associations to operational performance. Also, while much attention has been given to the contribution of Lean and Industry 4.0 to operational performance, little is known about their effect on worker outcomes. Therefore, we aim to investigate how these two paradigms interact and their effects on both operational performance and worker outcomes. We propose competing research models – mediation and moderation – to explain plausible relationships between Lean and Industry 4.0 on worker outcomes and operational performance. We test these models through empirical analysis of survey data from 415 manufacturing companies. Our results reveal that Industry 4.0 technologies act as antecedents when they are used to enhance Lean practices for operational performance (Lean as mediator) but serve as moderators in shaping worker outcomes within Lean systems. We also examine the detailed relationships between specific Lean bundles and Industry 4.0 technologies. Our findings highlight the need to strategically balance the adoption of technologies that support Lean for operational performance improvements with technologies that modify worker activities to enhance overall worker outcomes. We contribute to reconciling different perspectives on Lean and Industry 4.0 in the design of sociotechnical manufacturing systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"279 ","pages":"Article 109475"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324003323","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between Lean Manufacturing and Industry 4.0, two paradigms that have shaped modern manufacturing. While Lean Manufacturing seeks to optimize sociotechnical systems by integrating workers, processes, and technologies, the focus of Industry 4.0 is to integrate digital technologies into manufacturing processes. Related literature has considered a diversity of relationships between Lean and Industry 4.0 but used contradictory models to explain their associations to operational performance. Also, while much attention has been given to the contribution of Lean and Industry 4.0 to operational performance, little is known about their effect on worker outcomes. Therefore, we aim to investigate how these two paradigms interact and their effects on both operational performance and worker outcomes. We propose competing research models – mediation and moderation – to explain plausible relationships between Lean and Industry 4.0 on worker outcomes and operational performance. We test these models through empirical analysis of survey data from 415 manufacturing companies. Our results reveal that Industry 4.0 technologies act as antecedents when they are used to enhance Lean practices for operational performance (Lean as mediator) but serve as moderators in shaping worker outcomes within Lean systems. We also examine the detailed relationships between specific Lean bundles and Industry 4.0 technologies. Our findings highlight the need to strategically balance the adoption of technologies that support Lean for operational performance improvements with technologies that modify worker activities to enhance overall worker outcomes. We contribute to reconciling different perspectives on Lean and Industry 4.0 in the design of sociotechnical manufacturing systems.
精益和工业 4.0 如何影响工人成果和运营绩效:对竞争模式的量化评估
本研究探讨了精益生产和工业 4.0 这两种塑造现代制造业的范式之间的关系。精益生产旨在通过整合工人、流程和技术来优化社会技术系统,而工业 4.0 的重点则是将数字技术整合到制造流程中。相关文献考虑了精益生产和工业 4.0 之间的各种关系,但使用了相互矛盾的模型来解释它们与运营绩效的关系。此外,虽然精益和工业 4.0 对运营绩效的贡献备受关注,但它们对工人成果的影响却鲜为人知。因此,我们旨在研究这两种范式如何相互作用,以及它们对运营绩效和工人成果的影响。我们提出了相互竞争的研究模型--中介模型和调节模型--来解释精益生产和工业 4.0 对工人成果和运营绩效之间的合理关系。我们通过对 415 家制造企业的调查数据进行实证分析,检验了这些模型。我们的研究结果表明,工业 4.0 技术在用于提升精益实践以提高运营绩效时起着先行者的作用(精益作为中介),但在精益系统中却起着调节者的作用,影响着工人的成果。我们还研究了特定精益组合与工业 4.0 技术之间的详细关系。我们的研究结果突出表明,在采用支持精益的技术以提高运营绩效的同时,也要采用改变工人活动以提高工人整体成果的技术,这两者之间需要保持战略平衡。在社会技术制造系统的设计中,我们有助于协调精益和工业 4.0 的不同观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信