Ichnotaxonomic and morphological differentiation in pterosaur tracks using Geometric Morphometric analysis: A case study on Pteraichnus manus tracks from Cretaceous East Asia

IF 1.9 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOLOGY
Jongyun Jung , Hyemin Jo , Minguk Kim , Min Huh
{"title":"Ichnotaxonomic and morphological differentiation in pterosaur tracks using Geometric Morphometric analysis: A case study on Pteraichnus manus tracks from Cretaceous East Asia","authors":"Jongyun Jung ,&nbsp;Hyemin Jo ,&nbsp;Minguk Kim ,&nbsp;Min Huh","doi":"10.1016/j.cretres.2024.106033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Pteraichnus</em> is the most reported pterosaur ichnotaxa and the taxon with the largest number of reported ichnospecies. However, most ichnospecies of <em>Pteraichnus</em> are restricted to the type locality and type specimens and have not been expanded. This study employs two-dimensional landmark-based Geometric Morphometric analyses (GMA) to investigate the manus tracks of four ichnotaxa of <em>Pteraichnus</em> (<em>P. koreanensis, P. nipponensis, P. wuerhoensis</em>, and <em>P. gracilis</em>) from the Early Cretaceous of East Asia. These analyses are the first attempt to perform GMA on pterosaur ichnofossil and reveal that the morphological characteristics of these ichnotaxa are significantly distinguishable. In addition to traditional descriptive criteria, features such as the width of the digits and the metacarpal-phalangeal joint area were identified as valid criteria for numerical comparison. The results suggest that GMA can enhance the ichnotaxonomic classification of invalid or questionable ichnotaxa and provide taxonomic estimation for manus-only tracks. This approach highlights the potential for spatiotemporal comparisons between disparate pterosaur footprints. The distinct morphological features observed in tracks from relatively close localities suggest the presence of diverse pterosaur faunas across East Asia. Further research with an expanded dataset of pterosaurian ichnotaxa is recommended to refine ichnotaxonomic classifications and enhance our knowledge of pterosaur paleogeography.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55207,"journal":{"name":"Cretaceous Research","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 106033"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cretaceous Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195667124002064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pteraichnus is the most reported pterosaur ichnotaxa and the taxon with the largest number of reported ichnospecies. However, most ichnospecies of Pteraichnus are restricted to the type locality and type specimens and have not been expanded. This study employs two-dimensional landmark-based Geometric Morphometric analyses (GMA) to investigate the manus tracks of four ichnotaxa of Pteraichnus (P. koreanensis, P. nipponensis, P. wuerhoensis, and P. gracilis) from the Early Cretaceous of East Asia. These analyses are the first attempt to perform GMA on pterosaur ichnofossil and reveal that the morphological characteristics of these ichnotaxa are significantly distinguishable. In addition to traditional descriptive criteria, features such as the width of the digits and the metacarpal-phalangeal joint area were identified as valid criteria for numerical comparison. The results suggest that GMA can enhance the ichnotaxonomic classification of invalid or questionable ichnotaxa and provide taxonomic estimation for manus-only tracks. This approach highlights the potential for spatiotemporal comparisons between disparate pterosaur footprints. The distinct morphological features observed in tracks from relatively close localities suggest the presence of diverse pterosaur faunas across East Asia. Further research with an expanded dataset of pterosaurian ichnotaxa is recommended to refine ichnotaxonomic classifications and enhance our knowledge of pterosaur paleogeography.
利用几何形态计量分析对翼龙足迹进行分类和形态分化:白垩纪东亚翼龙足迹案例研究
翼龙是报道最多的翼龙生物群,也是报道的翼龙生物群数量最多的类群。然而,大多数翼龙的图案种仅限于模式产地和模式标本,尚未扩展。本研究采用基于二维地标的几何形态计量分析(GMA),研究了东亚早白垩世四个翼手目(P. koreanensis、P. nipponensis、P. wuerhoensis 和 P. gracilis)的肛迹。这些分析是对翼龙化石进行 GMA 的首次尝试,并揭示了这些化石群的形态特征具有显著的可区分性。除了传统的描述性标准外,指骨宽度和掌指关节面积等特征也被确定为进行数字比较的有效标准。结果表明,GMA 可以加强对无效或有疑问的生物分类学分类,并为仅有鬃毛的足迹提供分类估计。这种方法凸显了对不同翼龙足迹进行时空比较的潜力。在相对较近地点的足迹中观察到的不同形态特征表明,东亚地区存在多样化的翼龙动物群。建议通过扩大翼龙图谱数据集开展进一步研究,以完善图谱分类学,增进我们对翼龙古地理的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cretaceous Research
Cretaceous Research 地学-地质学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.00%
发文量
235
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cretaceous Research provides a forum for the rapid publication of research on all aspects of the Cretaceous Period, including its boundaries with the Jurassic and Palaeogene. Authoritative papers reporting detailed investigations of Cretaceous stratigraphy and palaeontology, studies of regional geology, and reviews of recently published books are complemented by short communications of significant new findings. Papers submitted to Cretaceous Research should place the research in a broad context, with emphasis placed towards our better understanding of the Cretaceous, that are therefore of interest to the diverse, international readership of the journal. Full length papers that focus solely on a local theme or area will not be accepted for publication; authors of short communications are encouraged to discuss how their findings are of relevance to the Cretaceous on a broad scale. Research Areas include: • Regional geology • Stratigraphy and palaeontology • Palaeobiology • Palaeobiogeography • Palaeoceanography • Palaeoclimatology • Evolutionary Palaeoecology • Geochronology • Global events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信