Michael Gallagher , Pete Evans , Joshua Sarpong-Duah
{"title":"Radiating out rather than scaling up: Horizontalism and digital educational governance in Ghana","authors":"Michael Gallagher , Pete Evans , Joshua Sarpong-Duah","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital education is often understood as a force for the standardization of education. In this paper, we argue for the development of policy and strategy instruments founded on situated local educational contexts and needs. Using the theoretical lens of Escobar’s horizontalism, we interrogate how educational governance in Ghana is being increasingly structured around digital technologies and the effects of these policy structures on local educational diversity. The governance around the digitalisation of education in Ghana sits in productive tension with that horizontalism. In this paper, we explore this through an analysis of two interrelated national instruments that speak to this digitalisation: (i) the Education Strategic Plan 2018 – 2030 and (ii) the ICT in education reform. We note how these instruments provide oversight and centralisation around the use of ICT in education in Ghana, and how this centralisation is seen as increasingly critical to meeting the scaled educational targets of SDG4. We explore how these policies cascade into two digital initiatives in education in Ghana, namely (i) Edmodo and (ii) the Open University Framework.</div><div>This analysis provides insight into how the structure of educational governance impacts what might potentially be diverse responses to local educational needs and contextual realities, how that governance is increasingly codified in policy and strategy instruments, and how those instruments are entangled in discrete digital initiatives. Our analysis, while rooted in the situated horizontalism of local educational needs, also engages with the globalised and universalist policy discourses of technology use in education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 103168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059324001950","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Digital education is often understood as a force for the standardization of education. In this paper, we argue for the development of policy and strategy instruments founded on situated local educational contexts and needs. Using the theoretical lens of Escobar’s horizontalism, we interrogate how educational governance in Ghana is being increasingly structured around digital technologies and the effects of these policy structures on local educational diversity. The governance around the digitalisation of education in Ghana sits in productive tension with that horizontalism. In this paper, we explore this through an analysis of two interrelated national instruments that speak to this digitalisation: (i) the Education Strategic Plan 2018 – 2030 and (ii) the ICT in education reform. We note how these instruments provide oversight and centralisation around the use of ICT in education in Ghana, and how this centralisation is seen as increasingly critical to meeting the scaled educational targets of SDG4. We explore how these policies cascade into two digital initiatives in education in Ghana, namely (i) Edmodo and (ii) the Open University Framework.
This analysis provides insight into how the structure of educational governance impacts what might potentially be diverse responses to local educational needs and contextual realities, how that governance is increasingly codified in policy and strategy instruments, and how those instruments are entangled in discrete digital initiatives. Our analysis, while rooted in the situated horizontalism of local educational needs, also engages with the globalised and universalist policy discourses of technology use in education.
数字教育通常被理解为教育标准化的一种力量。在本文中,我们主张根据当地的教育背景和需求制定政策和战略工具。利用埃斯科瓦尔的水平主义理论视角,我们探讨了加纳的教育治理如何越来越多地围绕数字技术展开,以及这些政策结构对当地教育多样性的影响。围绕加纳教育数字化的治理与水平主义之间存在着富有成效的紧张关系。在本文中,我们通过分析与数字化有关的两个相互关联的国家文书:(i) 《2018-2030 年教育战略计划》和 (ii) 教育改革中的信息和通信技术,来探讨这一问题。我们注意到这些文书是如何对加纳教育中信息和通信技术的使用进行监督和集中管理的,以及这种集中管理是如何被视为对实现可持续发展目标(SDG)4 的教育目标日益重要的。我们探讨了这些政策是如何在加纳的两项数字教育计划中得到体现的,这两项计划分别是:(i) Edmodo 和 (ii) 开放大学框架。这项分析深入探讨了教育治理结构是如何影响对当地教育需求和现实环境可能做出的各种反应的,这种治理是如何日益被编入政策和战略文书中的,以及这些文书是如何与离散的数字计划纠缠在一起的。我们的分析植根于当地教育需求的横向情况,同时也涉及教育技术应用的全球化和普遍主义政策论述。
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.