Near-fatal food anaphylaxis: From epidemiological data to care challenges

Guillaume Pouessel , Sylvie Leroy , Antoine Deschildre
{"title":"Near-fatal food anaphylaxis: From epidemiological data to care challenges","authors":"Guillaume Pouessel ,&nbsp;Sylvie Leroy ,&nbsp;Antoine Deschildre","doi":"10.1016/j.jahd.2024.100018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Near-fatal and fatal anaphylaxis induced by food is a critical event for the patient/caregivers but is also a challenge for the physician/allergist for both acute and long-term care. We aimed to describe the epidemiology of food-induced near-fatal anaphylaxis (NFA), the key factors that may impact their approach, and its management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this narrative review, we have focused on food-induced NFA moving from epidemiological data and risk factors to management using a search of PubMed online databank.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>NFA is not well-defined in the literature. Food-induced anaphylaxis mortality rate is estimated less than 0.3 deaths per million persons-years in the general population. Refractory anaphylaxis also appears to be rare (&lt; 2 % of anaphylaxis cases). Food-induced NFA are mostly observed in children but can also occur in adults, even the elderly. While most countries report peanut/tree nuts being frequently involved in NFA, seafood or milks are reported in other countries.</div><div>Prior anaphylaxis, asthma diagnosis, IgE sensitization or basophil activation tests are not good predictors of NFA whereas adolescence/young adulthood are associated with a higher risk of severe outcome. However there remain major knowledge gaps regarding risk factors of NFA, including the impact of asthma.</div><div>There is a clear room for improvement in the prevention and management of NFA to focus on: prompt adrenaline use in prehospital care, innovations regarding alternative forms of injectable adrenaline, prevention at school, therapeutic education, food allergen avoidance and adequate labelling. Some patients may benefit from immunotherapy and/or biologicals in the context of personalized care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A collaborative research is needed to address knowledge gaps in anaphylaxis, even more for food-induced NFA. We need to go further in identifying biomarkers, pathophysiologic pathways, genetic factors that may be associated with an increased risk of NFA. Novel therapeutic options should be envisaged in these patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Hypersensitivity Diseases","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Hypersensitivity Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950312424000186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Near-fatal and fatal anaphylaxis induced by food is a critical event for the patient/caregivers but is also a challenge for the physician/allergist for both acute and long-term care. We aimed to describe the epidemiology of food-induced near-fatal anaphylaxis (NFA), the key factors that may impact their approach, and its management.

Methods

In this narrative review, we have focused on food-induced NFA moving from epidemiological data and risk factors to management using a search of PubMed online databank.

Results

NFA is not well-defined in the literature. Food-induced anaphylaxis mortality rate is estimated less than 0.3 deaths per million persons-years in the general population. Refractory anaphylaxis also appears to be rare (< 2 % of anaphylaxis cases). Food-induced NFA are mostly observed in children but can also occur in adults, even the elderly. While most countries report peanut/tree nuts being frequently involved in NFA, seafood or milks are reported in other countries.
Prior anaphylaxis, asthma diagnosis, IgE sensitization or basophil activation tests are not good predictors of NFA whereas adolescence/young adulthood are associated with a higher risk of severe outcome. However there remain major knowledge gaps regarding risk factors of NFA, including the impact of asthma.
There is a clear room for improvement in the prevention and management of NFA to focus on: prompt adrenaline use in prehospital care, innovations regarding alternative forms of injectable adrenaline, prevention at school, therapeutic education, food allergen avoidance and adequate labelling. Some patients may benefit from immunotherapy and/or biologicals in the context of personalized care.

Conclusion

A collaborative research is needed to address knowledge gaps in anaphylaxis, even more for food-induced NFA. We need to go further in identifying biomarkers, pathophysiologic pathways, genetic factors that may be associated with an increased risk of NFA. Novel therapeutic options should be envisaged in these patients.
濒临死亡的食物过敏性休克:从流行病学数据到护理挑战
导言:食物诱发的濒死性和致命性过敏性休克对患者/护理人员来说是一个关键事件,但对急诊和长期护理的医生/过敏学家来说也是一个挑战。我们的目的是描述食物诱发的近乎致命的过敏性休克(NFA)的流行病学、可能影响其治疗方法的关键因素及其管理方法。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们通过搜索 PubMed 在线数据库,重点关注食物诱发的 NFA,从流行病学数据、风险因素到管理方法。据估计,在普通人群中,食物诱发过敏性休克的死亡率低于每百万人年 0.3 例死亡。难治性过敏性休克似乎也很罕见(占过敏性休克病例的 2%)。食物诱发的非过敏性过敏症大多发生在儿童身上,但也可能发生在成年人甚至老年人身上。大多数国家报告说,花生/树坚果是非过敏性食物中毒的常见原因,而其他国家则报告说,海鲜或牛奶也是非过敏性食物中毒的常见原因。之前的过敏性休克、哮喘诊断、IgE致敏或嗜碱性粒细胞活化测试并不能很好地预测非过敏性食物中毒,而青春期/青年期则与较高的严重后果风险有关。然而,关于非过敏性鼻炎的风险因素,包括哮喘的影响,仍然存在很大的知识差距。非过敏性鼻炎的预防和管理显然有改进的余地,重点是:在院前护理中及时使用肾上腺素、创新注射肾上腺素的替代形式、在学校进行预防、治疗教育、避免使用食物过敏原和适当的标签。在个性化护理方面,一些患者可能会从免疫疗法和/或生物制剂中获益。我们需要进一步确定可能与过敏性休克风险增加有关的生物标志物、病理生理途径和遗传因素。应为这些患者设想新的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信