L2 Arabic pragmatics in the classroom: Insights from language instructors’ beliefs and practices

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Khaled Al Masaeed, Seth McCombie
{"title":"L2 Arabic pragmatics in the classroom: Insights from language instructors’ beliefs and practices","authors":"Khaled Al Masaeed,&nbsp;Seth McCombie","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Instructional pragmatics praxis has received increased attention in recent years, but a good deal of this literature has focused on the L2 English context. More research is needed to determine the state of instructional pragmatics in other languages, such as Arabic, which has witnessed a foregrounding of interactional and pragmatic competence (Al Masaeed et al., 2020) that has not always been present. Therefore, the current study focused on L2 Arabic instructors in various countries to explore the state of pragmatics teaching in the field of L2 Arabic. To this end, the study utilized an online survey and follow-up interviews to contribute to our understanding of how teachers conceptualize pragmatics, how they approach instruction, and what needs and challenges they report when teaching pragmatics. The study also examined their perceptions of the quality and quantity of material available to them, their perceived levels of self-efficacy in teaching pragmatics, pre-service training, and how pragmatics teaching may differ across proficiency levels and institutional contexts. Data were collected from 52 teachers of Arabic as a second language (referred to here as L2 Arabic teachers) from various countries including USA, Jordan, Egypt, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, and France. Findings showed that while L2 Arabic teachers feel positively and passionately about teaching pragmatics and feel committed to integrating it into their classroom, there is a clear need for additional training and curriculum development to support their teaching of L2 Arabic pragmatics. Many teachers are well poised to benefit from such resources, but many are less prepared and may need a thorough grounding in the principles of instructional pragmatics. Consequently, the study concludes by underscoring the need for additional pre-service training, instructional scaffolding, and institutional support so teachers can be empowered to enhance their L2 Arabic learners’ pragmatic competence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 103546"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24003282","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Instructional pragmatics praxis has received increased attention in recent years, but a good deal of this literature has focused on the L2 English context. More research is needed to determine the state of instructional pragmatics in other languages, such as Arabic, which has witnessed a foregrounding of interactional and pragmatic competence (Al Masaeed et al., 2020) that has not always been present. Therefore, the current study focused on L2 Arabic instructors in various countries to explore the state of pragmatics teaching in the field of L2 Arabic. To this end, the study utilized an online survey and follow-up interviews to contribute to our understanding of how teachers conceptualize pragmatics, how they approach instruction, and what needs and challenges they report when teaching pragmatics. The study also examined their perceptions of the quality and quantity of material available to them, their perceived levels of self-efficacy in teaching pragmatics, pre-service training, and how pragmatics teaching may differ across proficiency levels and institutional contexts. Data were collected from 52 teachers of Arabic as a second language (referred to here as L2 Arabic teachers) from various countries including USA, Jordan, Egypt, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, and France. Findings showed that while L2 Arabic teachers feel positively and passionately about teaching pragmatics and feel committed to integrating it into their classroom, there is a clear need for additional training and curriculum development to support their teaching of L2 Arabic pragmatics. Many teachers are well poised to benefit from such resources, but many are less prepared and may need a thorough grounding in the principles of instructional pragmatics. Consequently, the study concludes by underscoring the need for additional pre-service training, instructional scaffolding, and institutional support so teachers can be empowered to enhance their L2 Arabic learners’ pragmatic competence.
课堂上的阿拉伯语第二语言语用学:从语言教师的信念和实践中获得的启示
近年来,语用学教学实践受到越来越多的关注,但大量文献都集中在第二语言英语环境中。还需要更多的研究来确定其他语言(如阿拉伯语)的教学语用学状况,阿拉伯语的互动和语用能力(Al Masaeed et al.因此,本研究以不同国家的 L2 阿拉伯语教师为重点,探讨 L2 阿拉伯语领域的语用学教学现状。为此,本研究通过在线调查和后续访谈,帮助我们了解教师如何构思语用学,如何进行教学,以及他们在教授语用学时有哪些需求和挑战。研究还考察了他们对可用材料的质量和数量的看法、他们在语用学教学中的自我效能感水平、职前培训以及不同水平和机构背景下的语用学教学有何不同。我们收集了来自美国、约旦、埃及、摩洛哥、沙特阿拉伯和法国等不同国家的 52 名阿拉伯语作为第二语言的教师(在此称为第二语言阿拉伯语教师)的数据。研究结果表明,尽管第二语言阿拉伯语教师对语用学教学抱有积极和热情的态度,并致力于将其融入课堂,但他们显然需要更多的培训和课程开发,以支持他们的第二语言阿拉伯语语用学教学。许多教师完全有能力从这些资源中获益,但许多教师准备不足,可能需要在语用学教学原则方面打下坚实的基础。因此,本研究在结论中强调,有必要提供更多的岗前培训、教学支架和机构支持,使教师有能力提高他们的第二语言阿拉伯语学习者的语用能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信