Application of risk informed safety margin characterization to the analysis of a pressurized water reactor

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Y.M. Chen , D.W. Wu , T.C. Wang , M. Lee
{"title":"Application of risk informed safety margin characterization to the analysis of a pressurized water reactor","authors":"Y.M. Chen ,&nbsp;D.W. Wu ,&nbsp;T.C. Wang ,&nbsp;M. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2024.111066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The sequence Core Damage Frequency of a pressurized water reactor has been quantified in three initiating events that are Medium Break Loss of Coolant Accident, Small Break Loss of Coolant Accident and Steam Generator Tube Rupture, following a realistic methodology called risk informed safety margin characteristic. The surrogate plant analyzed in the study is a typical pressurized water reactor. The plant adopted two Westinghouse Three-Loop Pressurized Water Reactors with rated thermal power of 2,830 MWt. The phenomenon identification and ranking table is applied for uncertainty analysis. The mitigation actions as described in plant specific Probabilistic Risk Assessment include cooldown and depressurization, emergency cooldown and depressurization, high head safety injection, high head safety recirculation, low head safety recirculation and Refueling Water Storage Tank replenishment. These mitigation actions are analyzed by thermal hydraulic system analysis code RELAP5-3D to determine the successfulness of the actions. The uncertainties of input parameters of the plant conditions are included, and the time of mitigation action executed is treated as one of the input uncertainties. The results of realistic methodology show a decrease in Core Damage Frequency for all three analyzed events in comparison with conventional methodology. The differences between three initiating events are also discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 111066"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454924007291","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sequence Core Damage Frequency of a pressurized water reactor has been quantified in three initiating events that are Medium Break Loss of Coolant Accident, Small Break Loss of Coolant Accident and Steam Generator Tube Rupture, following a realistic methodology called risk informed safety margin characteristic. The surrogate plant analyzed in the study is a typical pressurized water reactor. The plant adopted two Westinghouse Three-Loop Pressurized Water Reactors with rated thermal power of 2,830 MWt. The phenomenon identification and ranking table is applied for uncertainty analysis. The mitigation actions as described in plant specific Probabilistic Risk Assessment include cooldown and depressurization, emergency cooldown and depressurization, high head safety injection, high head safety recirculation, low head safety recirculation and Refueling Water Storage Tank replenishment. These mitigation actions are analyzed by thermal hydraulic system analysis code RELAP5-3D to determine the successfulness of the actions. The uncertainties of input parameters of the plant conditions are included, and the time of mitigation action executed is treated as one of the input uncertainties. The results of realistic methodology show a decrease in Core Damage Frequency for all three analyzed events in comparison with conventional methodology. The differences between three initiating events are also discussed.
在压水反应堆分析中应用风险知情安全裕度表征法
压水堆的顺序堆芯损坏频率是按照一种称为风险知情安全裕度特征的现实方法,在中型破裂失去冷却剂事故、小型破裂失去冷却剂事故和蒸汽发生器管破裂这三种启动事件中进行量化的。研究中分析的替代电厂是一个典型的压水反应堆。该电厂采用了两台西屋三回路压水堆,额定热功率为 2,830 兆瓦。不确定性分析采用了现象识别和排序表。工厂特定概率风险评估中描述的缓解措施包括冷却和减压、紧急冷却和减压、高水头安全注入、高水头安全再循环、低水头安全再循环和补充燃料水储罐。这些缓解措施通过热液压系统分析代码 RELAP5-3D 进行分析,以确定这些措施是否成功。其中包括电厂条件输入参数的不确定性,以及执行缓解措施的时间作为输入不确定性之一。现实方法的结果显示,与传统方法相比,所有三个分析事件的核心损坏频率都有所下降。此外,还讨论了三个启动事件之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Annals of Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
21.10%
发文量
632
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信