Effectiveness of high versus mixed-level fidelity simulation on undergraduate nursing students: A randomised controlled trial

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Carolina Chabrera , Laura Curell , Encarnación Rodríguez-Higueras
{"title":"Effectiveness of high versus mixed-level fidelity simulation on undergraduate nursing students: A randomised controlled trial","authors":"Carolina Chabrera ,&nbsp;Laura Curell ,&nbsp;Encarnación Rodríguez-Higueras","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study evaluates the impact of high-fidelity simulation on the acquisition and retention of competencies in nursing students.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>High-fidelity simulation provides a realistic and risk-free environment allowing students to practice, which potentially enhances the acquisition and retention of required competencies.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A blinded, randomised clinical trial with three arms was conducted with a pretest and a follow-up at 6 months (post-test 1) and 12 months (post-test 2).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This study was conducted with 105 s-year nursing students, divided into three groups: control (6 low-fidelity simulations), intervention 1 (3 high-fidelity and 3 low-fidelity) and intervention 2 (6 high-fidelity simulations). Competencies were assessed using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Student satisfaction was measured with the Simulated Clinical Experiences Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Initial competency scores were similar across groups. At 6 months, both intervention groups showed significant improvements in critical thinking (6.2 and 6.0, p &lt; 0.05), clinical skills (6.8 and 6.6, p &lt; 0.05), communication (8.0 and 8.3, p &lt; 0.05) and ethics (7.6 and 7.5, p &lt; 0.05) compared with the control group. Intervention group 1 demonstrated better competency retention at 12 months. Overall satisfaction with highfidelity simulation was high (9.13/10), with particular praise for the practical dimension (8.95/10), realism (8.02/10) and the cognitive dimension (9.43/10).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>High-fidelity simulation has the potential to enhance nursing competencies effectively. This approach supports long-term skill retention, highlighting the importance of a well-structured curriculum that integrates different simulation levels for optimal student preparation for clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 104206"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324003354","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study evaluates the impact of high-fidelity simulation on the acquisition and retention of competencies in nursing students.

Background

High-fidelity simulation provides a realistic and risk-free environment allowing students to practice, which potentially enhances the acquisition and retention of required competencies.

Design

A blinded, randomised clinical trial with three arms was conducted with a pretest and a follow-up at 6 months (post-test 1) and 12 months (post-test 2).

Method

This study was conducted with 105 s-year nursing students, divided into three groups: control (6 low-fidelity simulations), intervention 1 (3 high-fidelity and 3 low-fidelity) and intervention 2 (6 high-fidelity simulations). Competencies were assessed using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Student satisfaction was measured with the Simulated Clinical Experiences Scale.

Results

Initial competency scores were similar across groups. At 6 months, both intervention groups showed significant improvements in critical thinking (6.2 and 6.0, p < 0.05), clinical skills (6.8 and 6.6, p < 0.05), communication (8.0 and 8.3, p < 0.05) and ethics (7.6 and 7.5, p < 0.05) compared with the control group. Intervention group 1 demonstrated better competency retention at 12 months. Overall satisfaction with highfidelity simulation was high (9.13/10), with particular praise for the practical dimension (8.95/10), realism (8.02/10) and the cognitive dimension (9.43/10).

Conclusions

High-fidelity simulation has the potential to enhance nursing competencies effectively. This approach supports long-term skill retention, highlighting the importance of a well-structured curriculum that integrates different simulation levels for optimal student preparation for clinical practice.
高仿真模拟与混合仿真模拟对护理本科生的效果:随机对照试验
背景高保真模拟为学生提供了一个逼真且无风险的练习环境,这有可能增强学生对所需能力的掌握和保持。方法这项研究有 105 名护理专业一年级学生参加,分为三组:对照组(6 个低保真模拟)、干预组 1(3 个高保真模拟和 3 个低保真模拟)和干预组 2(6 个高保真模拟)。在基线、6 个月和 12 个月时,使用客观结构化临床考试对能力进行评估。结果各组的初始能力得分相似。6 个月时,与对照组相比,干预组在批判性思维(6.2 分和 6.0 分,p< 0.05)、临床技能(6.8 分和 6.6 分,p< 0.05)、沟通(8.0 分和 8.3 分,p< 0.05)和道德(7.6 分和 7.5 分,p< 0.05)方面均有显著提高。干预组 1 在 12 个月后的能力保持率更高。对高保真模拟的总体满意度很高(9.13/10),尤其是对实践维度(8.95/10)、逼真度(8.02/10)和认知维度(9.43/10)的评价。高保真模拟有可能有效提高护理能力,这种方法有助于长期技能保留,突出了结构合理的课程的重要性,这种课程整合了不同的模拟水平,为学生临床实践做好了最佳准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信