Geometrical and dosimetrical evaluation of different interpretations of a european consensus delineation guideline for the internal mammary lymph node chain in breast cancer patients

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Emma Skarsø Buhl , Geert Wortel , Rita Simões , Astrid Scholten , Birgitte Vrou Offersen , Stine Korreman , Tomas Janssen
{"title":"Geometrical and dosimetrical evaluation of different interpretations of a european consensus delineation guideline for the internal mammary lymph node chain in breast cancer patients","authors":"Emma Skarsø Buhl ,&nbsp;Geert Wortel ,&nbsp;Rita Simões ,&nbsp;Astrid Scholten ,&nbsp;Birgitte Vrou Offersen ,&nbsp;Stine Korreman ,&nbsp;Tomas Janssen","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><div> <!-->This study aimed at investigating the dosimetric impact on organs at risk, when the left-sided internal mammary lymph nodes (IMN) were delineated with two interpretations of the same guideline.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div> <!-->The cohort consisted of 95 left-sided breast cancer patients with indication for irradiation of the CTVn_IMN treated at the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI). The NKI interpretation of the ESTRO guidelines was in the clinical structure sets (CTVn_IMN_NKI). A deep learning model was used as second interpretation of the guideline, based on a Danish consensus interpretation (CTVn_IMN_DK). The geometrical similarity was evaluated with the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), volume, width, distance to sternal bone (SB) and maximum distance between the interpretations in the medial direction. Treatment plans were generated for both CTVn_IMNs. Mean heart dose (MHD) was correlated with the geometrical metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div> <!-->62 patients were eligible for analysis. The geometric comparison showed a median volume of 9.59 ml/7.19 ml for the CTVN_IMN_NKI/CTVn_IMN_DK along with a median DSC of 0.63. The width and distance from SB were significantly different, with a median width of 18.2 mm/14.7 mm and distance to SB of 3.4 mm/5.1 mm for CTVn_IMN_NKI/CTVn_IMN_DK. The MHD was significantly higher with the CTVn_IMN_NKI. The strongest correlation was found between MHD and maximum medial difference between the CTVn_IMN in slices where the heart was present.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Differences in interpretations of the CTVn_IMN delineation guidelines were found, resulting in significant differences in MHD. For the individual patients, the dosimetric differences may impact treatment decisions, underscoring the need for strong consensus across borders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100676"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose

 This study aimed at investigating the dosimetric impact on organs at risk, when the left-sided internal mammary lymph nodes (IMN) were delineated with two interpretations of the same guideline.

Materials and Methods

 The cohort consisted of 95 left-sided breast cancer patients with indication for irradiation of the CTVn_IMN treated at the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI). The NKI interpretation of the ESTRO guidelines was in the clinical structure sets (CTVn_IMN_NKI). A deep learning model was used as second interpretation of the guideline, based on a Danish consensus interpretation (CTVn_IMN_DK). The geometrical similarity was evaluated with the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), volume, width, distance to sternal bone (SB) and maximum distance between the interpretations in the medial direction. Treatment plans were generated for both CTVn_IMNs. Mean heart dose (MHD) was correlated with the geometrical metrics.

Results

 62 patients were eligible for analysis. The geometric comparison showed a median volume of 9.59 ml/7.19 ml for the CTVN_IMN_NKI/CTVn_IMN_DK along with a median DSC of 0.63. The width and distance from SB were significantly different, with a median width of 18.2 mm/14.7 mm and distance to SB of 3.4 mm/5.1 mm for CTVn_IMN_NKI/CTVn_IMN_DK. The MHD was significantly higher with the CTVn_IMN_NKI. The strongest correlation was found between MHD and maximum medial difference between the CTVn_IMN in slices where the heart was present.

Conclusions

Differences in interpretations of the CTVn_IMN delineation guidelines were found, resulting in significant differences in MHD. For the individual patients, the dosimetric differences may impact treatment decisions, underscoring the need for strong consensus across borders.
对乳腺癌患者乳腺内淋巴结链欧洲共识划定指南的不同解释进行几何和剂量学评估
背景和目的 本研究旨在调查当左侧乳腺内淋巴结(IMN)用同一指南的两种解释进行划定时,对危险器官的剂量影响。材料和方法 组群包括 95 名在荷兰癌症研究所(NKI)接受治疗、有 CTVn_IMN 照射指征的左侧乳腺癌患者。临床结构集(CTVn_IMN_NKI)中包含 NKI 对 ESTRO 指南的解释。深度学习模型根据丹麦共识解释(CTVn_IMN_DK)作为指南的第二种解释。几何相似性通过骰子相似系数(DSC)、体积、宽度、到胸骨(SB)的距离以及内侧方向上两种解释之间的最大距离进行评估。为两个 CTVn_IMN 生成了治疗计划。结果 62 名患者符合分析条件。几何比较显示,CTVn_IMN_NKI/CTVn_IMN_DK 的中位体积为 9.59 毫升/7.19 毫升,中位 DSC 为 0.63。CTVn_IMN_NKI/CTVn_IMN_DK的中位宽度为18.2毫米/14.7毫米,到SB的距离为3.4毫米/5.1毫米。CTVn_IMN_NKI 的 MHD 明显更高。在有心脏存在的切片中,MHD 与 CTVn_IMN 之间的最大内侧差之间的相关性最强。对于个体患者而言,剂量学差异可能会影响治疗决策,这就强调了在不同国家之间达成共识的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信