Drivers of hunting and photographic tourism income to communal conservancies in Namibia

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
J.D. Goergen , M. Lindeque , M.P. Louis , K.F. Kellner , G.J. Roloff , J.L. Belant
{"title":"Drivers of hunting and photographic tourism income to communal conservancies in Namibia","authors":"J.D. Goergen ,&nbsp;M. Lindeque ,&nbsp;M.P. Louis ,&nbsp;K.F. Kellner ,&nbsp;G.J. Roloff ,&nbsp;J.L. Belant","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hunting and photographic tourism provide ecosystem services that can facilitate conservation. Understanding factors influencing how tourism industries generate income is necessary to ensure sustainable community-based natural resource management. We evaluated effects of large mammal occurrence and landscape attributes on incomes from hunting and photographic tourism earned by communal conservancies in Namibia during 1998–2022. We compiled annual incomes and occurrence of ‘Big 5’ species (elephant [<em>Loxodonta africana</em>], buffalo [<em>Syncerus caffer</em>], black rhino [<em>Diceros bicornis</em>], lion [<em>Panthera leo</em>], and leopard [<em>P. pardus</em>]) using conservancy accounting and wildlife monitoring data. Hunting occurred in 70 of 86 conservancies and generated income almost twice as rapidly as photographic tourism (2.9 and 5.4 years after conservancy establishment, respectively). Hunting income increased with conservancy area and number of Big 5 species present but decreased with conservancy age and increasing mean elevation, topographic diversity, and distances to national parks. Photographic tourism occurred in 39 conservancies and generated 447 % greater median annual income than hunting for conservancies earning &gt;$0. Big 5 species occurrence increased the probability conservancies earned &gt;$0 photographic income but not the amount of photographic income. Photographic income increased with conservancy age and higher annual precipitation but decreased with higher mean elevation. Large mammals are an important driver of income to Namibia’s conservancies and hunting and photographic tourism can provide complementary benefits. We recommend Namibia’s conservancies, particularly those established more recently with smaller area, consider inter-conservancy wildlife co-management and collaboration with tourism industries to improve income potential and develop more sustainable community-based natural resource economies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article e03294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989424004980","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hunting and photographic tourism provide ecosystem services that can facilitate conservation. Understanding factors influencing how tourism industries generate income is necessary to ensure sustainable community-based natural resource management. We evaluated effects of large mammal occurrence and landscape attributes on incomes from hunting and photographic tourism earned by communal conservancies in Namibia during 1998–2022. We compiled annual incomes and occurrence of ‘Big 5’ species (elephant [Loxodonta africana], buffalo [Syncerus caffer], black rhino [Diceros bicornis], lion [Panthera leo], and leopard [P. pardus]) using conservancy accounting and wildlife monitoring data. Hunting occurred in 70 of 86 conservancies and generated income almost twice as rapidly as photographic tourism (2.9 and 5.4 years after conservancy establishment, respectively). Hunting income increased with conservancy area and number of Big 5 species present but decreased with conservancy age and increasing mean elevation, topographic diversity, and distances to national parks. Photographic tourism occurred in 39 conservancies and generated 447 % greater median annual income than hunting for conservancies earning >$0. Big 5 species occurrence increased the probability conservancies earned >$0 photographic income but not the amount of photographic income. Photographic income increased with conservancy age and higher annual precipitation but decreased with higher mean elevation. Large mammals are an important driver of income to Namibia’s conservancies and hunting and photographic tourism can provide complementary benefits. We recommend Namibia’s conservancies, particularly those established more recently with smaller area, consider inter-conservancy wildlife co-management and collaboration with tourism industries to improve income potential and develop more sustainable community-based natural resource economies.
纳米比亚社区保护区狩猎和摄影旅游收入的驱动因素
狩猎和摄影旅游业提供的生态系统服务可促进自然保护。要确保可持续的社区自然资源管理,就必须了解影响旅游业创收方式的因素。我们评估了 1998-2022 年间大型哺乳动物的出现和景观属性对纳米比亚社区保护区狩猎和摄影旅游业收入的影响。我们利用保护区会计和野生动物监测数据,编制了 "五大 "物种(大象[Loxodonta africana]、水牛[Syncerus caffer]、黑犀牛[Diceros bicornis]、狮子[Panthera leo]和花豹[P. pardus])的年收入和出现率。在 86 个保护区中,有 70 个保护区开展了狩猎活动,其创收速度几乎是摄影旅游的两倍(分别为保护区建立后 2.9 年和 5.4 年)。狩猎收入随着保护区面积和五大野生动物物种数量的增加而增加,但随着保护区年龄的增加、平均海拔的增加、地形多样性的增加以及与国家公园距离的增加而减少。摄影旅游出现在 39 个保护区中,对于年收入为 0 美元的保护区而言,摄影旅游带来的年收入中位数比狩猎收入高出 447%。大五河物种的出现增加了保护区获得 0 美元摄影收入的可能性,但并未增加摄影收入的数额。摄影收入随着保护区的年龄和年降水量的增加而增加,但随着平均海拔的升高而减少。大型哺乳动物是纳米比亚保护区收入的重要驱动力,狩猎和摄影旅游可以提供互补效益。我们建议纳米比亚的保护区,尤其是那些建立时间较短、面积较小的保护区,考虑保护区之间的野生动物共同管理以及与旅游业的合作,以提高收入潜力,发展更可持续的社区自然资源经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信