Randomised placebo-controlled trial of triclofos versus melatonin for sedating children undergoing sleep EEG.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Priyamol T Mohanan, Ruchika Jha, Arjun Kurup, Sarvesh Kohli, Sachendra Badal, Krishna Moorthi Adhikari, Faiz Mh Ahmad, Amit Devgan, Vishal Sondhi
{"title":"Randomised placebo-controlled trial of triclofos versus melatonin for sedating children undergoing sleep EEG.","authors":"Priyamol T Mohanan, Ruchika Jha, Arjun Kurup, Sarvesh Kohli, Sachendra Badal, Krishna Moorthi Adhikari, Faiz Mh Ahmad, Amit Devgan, Vishal Sondhi","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the efficacy of addition of melatonin or triclofos to sleep deprivation as compared with sleep deprivation with placebo for conduct of successful sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) among children between 6 months and 12 years of age.</p><p><strong>Design, setting and patients: </strong>486 children aged between 6 months and 12 years who were uncooperative or referred for sleep EEG were enrolled for this double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial between 30 June 2022 and 31 March 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>On the day of sleep EEG, participants were sleep deprived by 25% of their regular sleep duration and then randomly assigned to receive either triclofos (50 mg/kg), melatonin (weight ≤15 kg=3 mg; weight >15 kg=6 mg) or placebo.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Primary outcome was the conduct of a successful sleep EEG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>486 children were randomly assigned to intervention with triclofos (n=165), melatonin (n=161) or placebo (n=160). Sleep EEG success (p<0.001) with different interventions was: triclofos=145/165(88%); melatonin=123/161 (76%) and placebo=65/160 (41%). Sleep EEG's success rate was better with triclofos than melatonin (OR=2.2; 95% CI 1.2 to 4.1) or placebo (OR=10.6; 95% CI 6.1 to 19.0). Melatonin was better than placebo in the rate of successful sleep EEG (OR=4.7; 95% CI 2.9 to 7.7). Beta artefacts were significantly more with triclofos (51/145) than melatonin (19/123) and placebo (12/65), but the readability of EEG was not impacted. Movement/unwanted arousal artefacts were significantly more with placebo (37/65) than with triclofos (37/145) and melatonin (34/123). Drug-related adverse events were comparable between triclofos and melatonin. Neither of the drugs was associated with any serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both triclofos and melatonin are individually better than sleep deprivation alone for conducting successful sleep EEGs. Triclofos is significantly better than melatonin for conducting sleep EEGs, with no significant increase in adverse events.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>CTRI/2022/05/042479; Clinical Trials Registry of India.</p>","PeriodicalId":8150,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327416","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the efficacy of addition of melatonin or triclofos to sleep deprivation as compared with sleep deprivation with placebo for conduct of successful sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) among children between 6 months and 12 years of age.

Design, setting and patients: 486 children aged between 6 months and 12 years who were uncooperative or referred for sleep EEG were enrolled for this double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial between 30 June 2022 and 31 March 2023.

Intervention: On the day of sleep EEG, participants were sleep deprived by 25% of their regular sleep duration and then randomly assigned to receive either triclofos (50 mg/kg), melatonin (weight ≤15 kg=3 mg; weight >15 kg=6 mg) or placebo.

Outcome: Primary outcome was the conduct of a successful sleep EEG.

Results: 486 children were randomly assigned to intervention with triclofos (n=165), melatonin (n=161) or placebo (n=160). Sleep EEG success (p<0.001) with different interventions was: triclofos=145/165(88%); melatonin=123/161 (76%) and placebo=65/160 (41%). Sleep EEG's success rate was better with triclofos than melatonin (OR=2.2; 95% CI 1.2 to 4.1) or placebo (OR=10.6; 95% CI 6.1 to 19.0). Melatonin was better than placebo in the rate of successful sleep EEG (OR=4.7; 95% CI 2.9 to 7.7). Beta artefacts were significantly more with triclofos (51/145) than melatonin (19/123) and placebo (12/65), but the readability of EEG was not impacted. Movement/unwanted arousal artefacts were significantly more with placebo (37/65) than with triclofos (37/145) and melatonin (34/123). Drug-related adverse events were comparable between triclofos and melatonin. Neither of the drugs was associated with any serious adverse events.

Conclusions: Both triclofos and melatonin are individually better than sleep deprivation alone for conducting successful sleep EEGs. Triclofos is significantly better than melatonin for conducting sleep EEGs, with no significant increase in adverse events.

Trial registration number: CTRI/2022/05/042479; Clinical Trials Registry of India.

三氯杀螨醇与褪黑素的随机安慰剂对照试验,用于对接受睡眠脑电图检查的儿童进行镇静。
目的确定在剥夺睡眠的基础上添加褪黑素或三氯杀螨醇与使用安慰剂剥夺睡眠相比,对6个月至12岁儿童成功进行睡眠脑电图(EEG)的疗效:在2022年6月30日至2023年3月31日期间,486名年龄在6个月至12岁之间、不合作或被转诊进行睡眠脑电图检查的儿童被纳入这项双盲、安慰剂对照随机试验:干预措施:在进行睡眠脑电图检查当天,参与者被剥夺25%的正常睡眠时间,然后随机分配接受三氯杀螨醇(50毫克/千克)、褪黑素(体重≤15千克=3毫克;体重>15千克=6毫克)或安慰剂:主要结果是成功进行睡眠脑电图检查:486名儿童被随机分配接受三氯杀螨醇(n=165)、褪黑素(n=161)或安慰剂(n=160)的干预。睡眠脑电图成功率(p结论:在成功进行睡眠脑电图检查方面,三氯杀螨醇和褪黑素的效果均优于单独剥夺睡眠。在进行睡眠脑电图检查方面,三氯杀螨醇的效果明显优于褪黑素,且不良反应不会明显增加:试验登记号:CTRI/2022/05/042479;印度临床试验登记处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
291
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信