A cross-regional ecological assessment of contaminants in soils intended for agri-food initiatives on Indigenous Peoples’ lands in Australia and Canada

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Robert J. Moriarity, Meaghan J. Wilton, Leonard J. S. Tsuji, Atanu Sarkar, Eric N. Liberda
{"title":"A cross-regional ecological assessment of contaminants in soils intended for agri-food initiatives on Indigenous Peoples’ lands in Australia and Canada","authors":"Robert J. Moriarity,&nbsp;Meaghan J. Wilton,&nbsp;Leonard J. S. Tsuji,&nbsp;Atanu Sarkar,&nbsp;Eric N. Liberda","doi":"10.1007/s10661-024-13424-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Globally, soil contamination threatens ecosystems and food security. This study examines the contamination of soils intended for agri-food initiatives by Indigenous communities across New South Wales and Queensland, Australia, and Newfoundland and subarctic Ontario, Canada. Soils from 47 sites were tested for metals, metalloids, organochlorine (OC) pesticides, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to assess ecological risks and compare against national guidelines. Australian soils were primarily contaminated with lead (Pb) and to a lesser extent with other metals and metalloids, whereas subarctic Ontario soils were heavily contaminated with OC pesticides, and to a lesser extent metals and metalloids. Newfoundland soils contained arsenic (As) concentrations exceeding agricultural soil guidelines with limited OC levels. The contaminants from these sites stem from both anthropogenic activities and natural geological sources; however, their precise origins—whether from the historical use of banned substances or mineral extraction—are not fully elucidated for all sites. This article specifically highlights the need to assess soil to be used in agri-food initiatives for contaminants in rural and remote landscapes in Indigenous homelands worldwide and, in general, for all soil to be used in any agri-food initiative.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"196 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-024-13424-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13424-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, soil contamination threatens ecosystems and food security. This study examines the contamination of soils intended for agri-food initiatives by Indigenous communities across New South Wales and Queensland, Australia, and Newfoundland and subarctic Ontario, Canada. Soils from 47 sites were tested for metals, metalloids, organochlorine (OC) pesticides, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to assess ecological risks and compare against national guidelines. Australian soils were primarily contaminated with lead (Pb) and to a lesser extent with other metals and metalloids, whereas subarctic Ontario soils were heavily contaminated with OC pesticides, and to a lesser extent metals and metalloids. Newfoundland soils contained arsenic (As) concentrations exceeding agricultural soil guidelines with limited OC levels. The contaminants from these sites stem from both anthropogenic activities and natural geological sources; however, their precise origins—whether from the historical use of banned substances or mineral extraction—are not fully elucidated for all sites. This article specifically highlights the need to assess soil to be used in agri-food initiatives for contaminants in rural and remote landscapes in Indigenous homelands worldwide and, in general, for all soil to be used in any agri-food initiative.

对澳大利亚和加拿大土著人民土地上用于农业食品计划的土壤中的污染物进行跨区域生态评估
在全球范围内,土壤污染威胁着生态系统和粮食安全。本研究调查了澳大利亚新南威尔士州和昆士兰州以及加拿大纽芬兰省和安大略省亚北极地区土著社区用于农业食品计划的土壤污染情况。对 47 个地点的土壤进行了金属、类金属、有机氯 (OC) 杀虫剂和多氯联苯 (PCB) 检测,以评估生态风险并与国家指导方针进行比较。澳大利亚土壤主要受铅(Pb)污染,其他金属和类金属污染较轻,而安大略省亚北极地区土壤受有机氯农药污染严重,金属和类金属污染较轻。纽芬兰土壤中的砷(As)浓度超过了农业土壤标准,但 OC 含量有限。这些地点的污染物既来自人为活动,也来自天然地质来源;然而,它们的确切来源--无论是历史上使用禁用物质还是矿物开采--并没有完全阐明所有地点的情况。这篇文章特别强调,有必要对将用于农业食品计划的土壤进行评估,以确定其是否含有世界各地土著家园的农村和偏远地区的污染物,而且一般而言,有必要对将用于任何农业食品计划的所有土壤进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信